Sticky costs and regulation in private healthcare providers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2021.169260Keywords:
Sticky cost, National Supplementary Health Agency regulation, Private healthcare providersAbstract
This study aims to analyze the effects of the Brazilian National Supplementary Health Agency’s (NSHA) regulation on sticky costs of private healthcare providers (PHP). The research used financial and operational data from the NSHA analyzed through panel data regression and focused on PHP classified as medical cooperatives and group medicine between 2010 and 2018. The models developed employed different cost proxies (dependent variable) and explanatory variables. We verified that two cost proxies presented significant relations in all models: selling, general, and administrative expenses, and total cost. Concerning regulation variables, one was significant in the two studied modalities: PHP dependency ratio. This paper presents many contributions to different PHP’ stakeholders, such as NSHA, their managers, and Brazilian society. Among the main findings are (a) the importance of analyzing the organizations’ legal nature when examining sticky costs; (b) the proposal of different regulation variables to understand this phenomenon while displaying its importance in regulated industries; and (c) the relevance of employing different proxies when measuring sticky cost.
Downloads
References
Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade – 1931. (2003). Retrieved from http://portal.stf.jus.br/processos/detalhe.asp?incidente=1741189.
Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar – ANS. (2016) Dados e Indicadores do Setor. Retrieved from http://www.ans.gov.br/perfil-do-setor/dados-e-indicadores-do-setor.
Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar – ANS. Sala de Situação. 2020. Retrieved from http://www.ans.gov.br/perfil-do-setor/dados-e-indicadores-do-setor/sala-de-situacao.
Anderson, M. C.; Banker, R. D.; & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are Selling, General, and Administrative Costs “Sticky”? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 47-63. DOI: https://doi.org/1475-679X.00095
Avelar, E. A., Boina, T. M., Jordão, R. V. D., Santos, W. C., & Ferreira, C. O. (2019a). Análise dos Efeitos da Regulação da Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar (ANS) Sobre o Fenômeno dos Custos Assimétricos (Sticky Costs) em Cooperativas Médicas (Unimeds) brasileiras. Anais do Congresso Nacional de Administração e Contabilidade (Proceedings of the National Conference of Administration and Accounting), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 10 – Retrieved from: http://adcont.net/index.php/adcont/adcont2019/paper/viewFile/3537/1029
Avelar, E. A., Souza, A. A. Amaral, H. F., & Reyes, S. T.(2019b). Endividamento de operadoras de planos de saúde da modalidade autogestão e regulação da saúde suplementar. REAd. Revista Eletrônica de Administração, 25(3), 124-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-2311.271.96907
Cook, D. O., Kieschnick, R., & Moussawi, R. (2019). Operating leases, Operating leverage, Operational Inflexibility and Sticky Costs. Finance Research Letters, 31, 369-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.12.012
Fávero, L. P. (2015). Análise de Dados: Modelos de Regressão com Excel®, Stata® e SPSS®. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
Fourati, Y. M., Chakroun Ghorbel, R., & Jarboui, A. (2020). Sticky cost behavior and its implication on accounting conservatism: a cross-country study. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. 18(1), 169-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-08-2018-0071
Gelbcke, E. R.; Santos, A.; Iudícibus, S. & Martins, E.(2018). Manual de contabilidade societária: aplicável a todas as sociedades de acordo com as normas internacionais e do CPC. (3a ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.
Grejo, L. M.; Abbas, K.; Camacho, R. R. & Junqueira, E.(2019). A influência do ativo imobilizado no comportamento assimétrico dos custos. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 16(38), 35-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2019v16n38p35
Guimarães, A. L. de S., & Nossa, V. (2010). Working capital, profitability, liquidity and solvency of healthcare insurance companies. Brazilian Business Review, 7(2), 37-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2010.7.2.3
Gujarati, D. & Porter, D. C.(2011). Econometria básica (5a. ed.) Porto Alegre: AMGH.
Hartlieb, S., Loy, T. R., & Eierle, B. (2019). Does community social capital affect asymmetric cost behaviour? Management Accounting Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2019.02.002
He, J., Tian, X., Yang, H., & Zuo, L. (2020). Asymmetric Cost Behavior and Dividend Policy. Journal of Accounting Research, 58(4) 989-1021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12328
Holzhacker, M., Krishnan, R., & Mahlendorf, M. D.(2015). The Impact of Changes in Regulation on Cost Behavior. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(2), 534–566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12082
Kudlawicz, C.; Steiner, P. J., Neto, & Frega, J. R. (2015). Homogeneidade e rentabilidade: o caso das operadoras de planos de saúde. Revista de Informação Contábil, 9(1), 50-67.
Lei n. 9656, de 3 de junho de 1998 (Brazilian Law 9656, June 3, 1998). Provides on private health insurance plans. Retrieved from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/L9656.htm.
Lei n. 9.961, de 28 de janeiro de 2000 (Brazilian Law 9961, January 28, 2000). Establishes the National Agency of Supplementary Health (ANS). Retrieved from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9961.htm.
Lei n. 12.527, de 18 de novembro de 2011 (Brazilian Law 12527, November 18, 2011). Regulates the access to information provided on item XXXIII of art 5; item II of paragraph 3 of art 37; and paragraph 2 of art 216 of the Federal Constitution. Modifies Law 8112, December 11, 1990. Repeals Law 11111, May 5, 2005; and provisions of Law 8159, January 8, 1991. Retrieved from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2011/lei/l12527.htm.
Li, Z., Ying, Q., Chen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). Managerial risk appetite and asymmetry cost behavior: evidence from China. Accounting & Finance. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12692
Malik, M. (2012). A Review and Synthesis of ‘Cost Stickiness’ Literature. SSRN. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2276760.
Porporato, M., & Werbin, E.(2012). Evidence of sticky costs in banks of Argentina, Brazil and Canada. International Journal of Financial Services Management, 5(4), 303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijfsm.2012.048834
Reis, L. S. & Borgert, A. (2019). Análise conjunta de fatores explicativos para o comportamento assimétrico dos custos. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 16(40), 91-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2019v16n40p91
Resolução de Diretoria Colegiada n. 29, de 26 de junho 2000 - ANS (Resolution 29 of ANS Board of Directors, June 26, 2000). Establishes norms to adjust pecuniary benefits of private supplementary health insurance plans and products. Retrieved from http://www.ans.gov.br/component/legislacao/?view=legislacao&task=TextoLei&format=raw&id=Mzg1.
Resolução de Diretoria Colegiada n. 39, de 27 de outubro de 2000 - ANS (Resolution 39 of ANS Board of Directors, October 27, 2000). Provides on the definition, segmentation, and classification of health insurance plan operators. Retrieved from http://www.ans.gov.br/component/legislacao/?view=legislacao&task=TextoLei&format=raw&id=Mzgw.
Resolução Normativa n. 63 de, 22 de dezembro de 2003 – ANS (Resolution 63 of ANS Board of Directors, December 22, 2003). Establishes limits to adopt variation of prices according to age in private health insurance plans contracted after January 1, 2004. Retrieved from http://www.ans.gov.br/component/legislacao/?view=legislacao&task=TextoLei&format=raw&id=NzQ4.
Richartz, F. & Borgert, A. (2016). Fatores explicativos para o comportamento assimétrico dos custos das empresas listadas na BM&FBOVESPA. Anais do Congresso Brasileiro de Contabilidade (Proceedings of the Brazilian Conference of Accounting), Porto de Galinhas, PE, Brazil, 23.
Shust, E., & Weiss, D. (2014). Discussion of asymmetric cost behavior—Sticky costs: Expenses versus cash flows. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 81-90. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.2308/jmar-10406
Stimolo, M. I., & Porporato, M. (2019). How different cost behaviour is in emerging economies? Evidence from Argentina. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies. 10(1), 21-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-05-2018-0050
Subramaniam, C. & M. L. Weidenmier (2003). Additional evidence on the sticky behavior of costs. Social Science Research Network, Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=369941
Varella, D. & Ceschin, M. (2014). A saúde dos planos de saúde: os desafios da assistência privada no Brasil. São Paulo: Paralela.
Venieris, G.; Naoum, V. C. & Vlismas, O. (2015), Organisation capital and sticky behaviour of selling, general and administrative expenses. Management Accounting Research, 26, 54–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2014.10.003
Zhang, J., Yin, M., Han, J., & Aroskar, R. (2019). Why is asset-light strategy necessary? An empirical analysis through the lens of cost stickiness. Tourism Management Perspectives, 32, 100571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.100571
Zonatto, V. C. S., Magro, C. B. D., Sant’ana, C. F. & Padilha, D. F. (2018). Effects of economic growth in the behavior of sticky costs of companies belonging to BRICS countries. Contaduría y Administración, 63(4), p. 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2018.1110.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The RCO adopts the Free Open Access policy, under the standard Creative Commons agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The agreement provides that:
- Submission of text authorizes its publication and implies commitment that the same material is not being submitted to another journal. The original is considered definitive.
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with necessary recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their personal page) before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
- The journal does not pay copyright to the authors of the published texts.
- The journal's copyright holder, except those already agreed in the Free Open Access Agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), is the Accounting Department of the Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting of Ribeirão Preto of the University of São Paulo.
No submission or publication fees are charged.
Up to 4 authors per article are accepted. Exceptionally duly justified cases may be reviewed by the Executive Committee of the RCO. Exceptional cases are considered as: multi-institutional projects; manuscripts resulting from the collaboration of research groups; or involving large teams for evidence collection, construction of primary data, and comparative experiments.
It is recommended that the authorship be ordered by contribution of each of the individuals listed as authors, especially in the design and planning of the research project, in obtaining or analyzing and interpreting data, and writing. Authors must declare the actual contributions of each author, filling the letter to the editor, at the beginning of the submission, taking responsibility for the information given.
Authors are allowed to change throughout the evaluation process and prior to the publication of the manuscript. The Authors should indicate the composition and final order of authorship in the document signed by all those involved when accepted for publication. If the composition and authoring order is different than previously reported in the system, all previously listed authors should be in agreement.
In the case of identification of authorship without merit or contribution (ghost, guest or gift authorship), the RCO follows the procedure recommended by COPE.
