The combined use of environmental management controls in water performance: the influenceof the environmental capability of strategic proactivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2025.230636Keywords:
Environmental management control system, Combined use of controls, Environmental capacity of strategic proactivity, Water performanceAbstract
Beef slaughterhouses generate environmental impacts due to the significant consumption of water and energy in their production processes, generation of waste and polluting effluents, in addition to an increase in greenhouse gases that harm the ozone layer. In this context, environmental strategies must be developed in order to reduce these impacts. Thus, the research seeks to analyze the influence that the combined use of diagnostic and interactive environmental management controls has on water performance, through the environmental capacity of strategic proactivity. To achieve this objective, a questionnaire was applied, and 149 responses were obtained, which were analyzed using structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The results show that the combination of diagnostic and interactive uses of environmental management controls positively influences the environmental capacity of strategic proactivity. And that such environmental capacity benefits water performance. The results also show the importance of the environmental capacity of strategic proactivity to achieve water performance in slaughterhouses. With these findings, the research contributes mainly to the Theory of the Natural Resource-Based View by considering the effects of the combined use of environmental management controls, diagnostic and interactive, towards sustainable results. And it contributes by showing that the combined use of environmental management controls is beneficial for improving water performance.
Downloads
References
Albertini, E. (2019). The contribution of management control systems to environmental capabilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 159, 1163-1180. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10551-018-3810-9.
Anzilago, M. & Lunkes, R. J. (2024). Effect of collaboration on the relationship between social exchange and management control system design. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 18, Article e219391. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2024.219391.
Appannan, J. S., Said, R. M., Ong, T. S. & Senik, R. (2020). Environmental proactivity on environmental performance: an extension of natural resource-based view theory (NRBV). International Journal of Industrial Management, 5(1), 56-65. https://doi. org/10.15282/ijim.5.0.2020.5622.
Baranova, P. & Meadows, M. (2017). Engaging with environmental stakeholders: Routes to building environmental capabilities in the context of the low carbon economy. Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility, 26(2), 112-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12141.
Bedford, D. S. (2020). Conceptual and empirical issues in understanding management control combinations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2020.101187.
Bortoluzzi, D. A., Lunkes, R. J. & Zambra, E. M. (2023). Influence of green customer demand and eco-control on eco-innovation and on the sustainable growth of beef sector companies. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 17, Article e210290. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2023.210290
CNN Brasil (2023). Entenda a lei europeia que proíbe a importação de produtos ligados ao desmatamento. Recuperado em: https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/economia/ entenda-a-lei-europeia-que-proibe-a-importacao-de-produtos-ligados-ao-desmatamento/. Acesso 06 dez. 2023.
Farias, C. J., Heinrich, R. C. & Roesler, M. R. v. B. (2020). A invisibilidade da água na produção dos alimentos: interfaces entre economia e desenvolvimento sustentável. Revista de Gestão & Sustentabilidade Ambiental, 9(1), 513-523. https://doi.org/10.19177/rgsa.v9e12020513-523.
Frare, A. B., Colombo, V. L. B. & Beuren, I. (2022). Sistema de mensuração de desempenho, satisfação ambiental e engajamento no trabalho verde. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 33(90). 10.1590/1808-057x20211503.pt.
Fu, W. & Jacobs, B. W. (2022). Does increased water efficiency improve financial performance? The important role of operational efficiency. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 42(3), 304-330. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2021-0628
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M. & Ringle, C. M (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
Hart, S. L. (1995). Natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20(4), 986–1014.
Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). Invited editorial: A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464–1479.
Heggen, C. & Sridharan, V. G. (2021). The effects of an enabling approach to eco-control on firms’ environmental performance: A research note. Management Accounting Research, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2020.100724.
Henri, J.-F. & Journeault, M. (2010). Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.02. 001.
Henri, J-F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: a resource-based perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, p. 529-558.
Ji, Y., Ji, M., Yang, G. & Dong, S. (2023). Water resource management and financial performance in high water-sensitive corporates. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2493
Journeault, M. (2016). The influence of the eco-control package on environmental and economic performance: a natural resource-based approach. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(2), 149-178. 10.2308/jmar-51476.
Journeault, M., De Rongé, Y. & Henri, J-F. (2016). Levers of eco-control and competitive environmental strategy. The British Accounting Review, 48(3), 316-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2016.06.001.
Knels, V., Janka, M. & Guenther, T. (2024). Exploring the Duality of Formal and Informal Controls in Driving Eco-Innovations. European Accounting Review, 34(4), 1469–1497. https://doi-org.ez46.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1080/09638180.2024.2400118
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: a full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10, October-December. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101.
Laguir, I., Stekelorum, R., Beysül, A., Mouadili, O. & Segbotangni, E. A. (2024). Eco-control systems and firm performance: Understanding the mediating role of circular economy practices and the moderating role of environmental uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141894.
MIDR - Ministério da Integração e do Desenvolvimento Regional. (2024). Usos da água. Recuperado em: https://www.gov.br/ana/pt-br/assuntos/gestao-das-aguas/usos-da-agua/industria. Acesso 12 jun de 2024.
Mishra, P., Yadav, M. (2021). Environmental capabilities, proactive environmental strategy and competitive advantage: A natural-resource-based view of firms operating in India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro. 2020.125249.
Monteiro, J., Malagueño, R., & Lunkes, R. J. (2025). Eco-control and sustainability strategy: How organisations juxtapose tensions to enhance sustainability performance? Accounting Forum, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2025.2489239
Müller-Stewens, B., Widener, S. K., Möller, K. & Steinmann, J-C. (2020). The role of diagnostic and interactive control uses in innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2019.101078.
Nuhu, N. A., Baird, K. & Su, S. (2023). The impact of interactive and diagnostic levers of eco-control on eco-innovation: The mediating role of employee environmental citizenship behavior. Accounting and Finance, 63(2), 2245-2271. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12967.
Ornellas, R. da S. (2017). Almejando o mundo do futuro: a proposição de um modelo prospectivo global para produção e consumo sustentável de carne bovina. [Tese de doutorado, Universidade de São Paulo, SP, Brasil]. Repositório.
Orozco, M. M. D., Oliveira, J. G., Andrade, N. L. R., Ribeiro, J. G. S. & Hanai, F. Y. (2021). Estimativa do consumo de água no processo produtivo de indústria frigorífica de bovinos em Ji-Paraná/Rondônia. Revista Ibero Americana de Ciências Ambientais, 12(5), 243- 258, 2021. http://doi.org/10.6008/CBPC2179- 6858.2021.005.0022
Ortas, E., Burritt, R. L. & Christ, K. L. (2019). The influence of macro factors on corporate water management: A multi-country quantile regression approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 1013-1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro. 2019.04.165.
Pacheco, J. W. (2006). Guia técnico ambiental de frigoríficos - industrialização de carnes (bovina e suína). São Paulo: Cetesb.
Passetti, E., Battaglia, M., Testa, F. & Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. (2020). Multiple control mechanisms for employee health and safety integration: effects and complementarity. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(7), 1595-1626. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2019-4277
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0021- 9010.88.5.879.
Ramanathan, R., Ramanathan, U. & Zhang, Y. (2016). Linking operations, marketing and environmental capabilities and diversification to hotel performance: A data envelopment analysis approach. Int. J. Production Economics, 176, 111–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.010.
Rosa, F. S., Compagnucci, L., Lunkes, R. J. & Monteiro, J. J. (2023). Green innovation ecosystem and water performance in the food service industry: The effects of environmental management controls and digitalization. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(8), 5459-5476. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3430.
Rosa, F. S., Lunkes, R. J., Codesso, M., Mendes, A. C. A. & Costa, G. D. (2025a). Effects of green innovation ecosystem coopetition, environmental management practices and digital innovation on carbon footprint reduction. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 37(3), 722–739. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-01-2024-0021
Rosa, F. S., Lunkes, R. J., Schäfer, J. D. & Codesso, M. M. (2025b). Digital innovation for food waste reduction in hotels: the complementary effect of digital capabilities and innovation ecosystem coopetition. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 33(10), 2225–2239. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2024.2438233
Rosa, R. S., Lunkes, R. J., Spigarelli, F. & Compagnucci, L. (2021). Environmental innovation and the food, energy and water nexus in the food service industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 166, 105350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. resconrec.2020.105350.
Rötzel, P. G., Stehle, A., Pedell, B. & Hummel, K. (2019). Integrating environmental management control systems to translate environmental strategy into managerial performance. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 15(4), pp. 626-653. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-08-2018-0082.
Sharma, S., Aragón-Correa, J. A. & Rueda-Manzanares, A. (2004). A contingent resource-based analysis of environmental strategy in the sky industry. ASAC Quebéc.
Sharma, S., Aragón-Correa, J. A. & Rueda-Manzanares, A. (2007). The contingent influence of organizational capabilities on proactive environmental strategy in the service sector: na analysis of North American and European ski resorts. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 24(1), 268-283.
Simons, R. (1995). Control in an age of empowerment. Harvard Business Review, 73(2).
Strasburg, V. J. & Jahno, V. D. (2017). Application of eco-efficiency in the assessment of raw materials consumed by university restaurants in Brazil: A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 178-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro. 2017.05.089.
Strokal, M., Janssen, A. B. G., Chen, X., Kroeze, C., Li, F. Ma, L., Yu, H., Zhang, F. & Wang, M. (2021). Green agriculture and blue water in China: reintegrating crop and livestock production for clean water. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 8(1), 72‒80 https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2020366.
Weber, O. & Saunders-Hogberg, G. (2020). Corporate social responsibility, water management, and financial performance in the food and beverage industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1937-1946. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1937.
Widener, S. K. (2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 757-788. 10.1016/j.aos.2007.01.001.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dra. Leticia Matiolli Grejo, Dr. Rogério João Lunkes, Dra. Fabricia Silva da Rosa, Dr. Alcindo Cipriano Argolo Mendes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The RCO adopts the Free Open Access policy, under the standard Creative Commons agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The agreement provides that:
- Submission of text authorizes its publication and implies commitment that the same material is not being submitted to another journal. The original is considered definitive.
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with necessary recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their personal page) before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
- The journal does not pay copyright to the authors of the published texts.
- The journal's copyright holder, except those already agreed in the Free Open Access Agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), is the Accounting Department of the Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting of Ribeirão Preto of the University of São Paulo.
No submission or publication fees are charged.
Up to 4 authors per article are accepted. Exceptionally duly justified cases may be reviewed by the Executive Committee of the RCO. Exceptional cases are considered as: multi-institutional projects; manuscripts resulting from the collaboration of research groups; or involving large teams for evidence collection, construction of primary data, and comparative experiments.
It is recommended that the authorship be ordered by contribution of each of the individuals listed as authors, especially in the design and planning of the research project, in obtaining or analyzing and interpreting data, and writing. Authors must declare the actual contributions of each author, filling the letter to the editor, at the beginning of the submission, taking responsibility for the information given.
Authors are allowed to change throughout the evaluation process and prior to the publication of the manuscript. The Authors should indicate the composition and final order of authorship in the document signed by all those involved when accepted for publication. If the composition and authoring order is different than previously reported in the system, all previously listed authors should be in agreement.
In the case of identification of authorship without merit or contribution (ghost, guest or gift authorship), the RCO follows the procedure recommended by COPE.




