Implementing the 'Technique and Price' Criterion in Public Procurement in Brazil: Challenges and Opportunities for Specialized Technical Services of Predominantly Intellectual Nature (STENPI)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2319-0558.v13i1p%25pParole chiave:
Technique and Price, STENPI, Public Procurement, Brazil, Law 14.133/2021, Public Administration, Contract ManagementAbstract
This study investigates the implementation of Brazil's New Bidding Law No. 14,133/2021 (Lei nº 14.133/2021), focusing on the "Technique and Price" evaluation criterion for Specialized Technical Services of Predominantly Intellectual Nature (STENPI—Serviços Técnicos Especializados de Natureza Predominantemente Intelectual). Utilizing a qualitative interpretive approach, researchers conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with various stakeholders, alongside documentary analysis of 64 objection requests submitted by sector unions. Five key themes emerged from reflexive thematic analysis: institutional and technical capacity gaps, systemic implementation barriers, cultural and behavioral resistance, the complexity of technical evaluation, and the valorization of professional services. These themes underscore the challenges hindering effective adoption while indicating the potential for improving public procurement quality. The research provides the first empirical analysis of Law 14,133/2021's implementation in the STENPI sector, demonstrating that the "Technique and Price" criterion offers a better balance between technical quality and economic viability. The analysis reveals that excessive discount percentages (averaging 42.57% in federal infrastructure projects) negatively impact contract execution capacity. The study suggests pathways for institutional strengthening, such as criteria standardization, team training, and alignment of control bodies, with implications for public procurement reform in developing countries moving from lowest-price to value-based strategies.
Downloads
Riferimenti bibliografici
ABOELAZM, K. S., OBEIDAT, M. A., TAWAKOL, F., ALFIL, N. Z., & UL HAQ, F. H. I. (2025). Ameliorating public procurement performance: Green public procurement policies within a legislative framework. Corporate Law & Governance Review, 7(2), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv7i2p2
BALLESTEROS-PÉREZ, P., SKITMORE, M., PELLICER, E., & ZHANG, X. (2015). Scoring rules and abnormally low bids criteria in construction tenders: A taxonomic review. Construction Management and Economics, 33(4), 259-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2015.1059951
BERGMAN, M. A., & LUNDBERG, S. (2013). Tender evaluation and supplier selection methods in public procurement. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(2), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2013.02.003
BOVIS, C. (1999). Replacing CCT with "best value". Amicus Curiae, 15, 4-7. https://doi.org/10.14296/ac.v1999i15.1495
BRAZIL, Ministry of Management and Innovation in Public Services. (2023). SEGES/MGI Normative Instruction No. 2, of February 7, 2023. Provides for bidding by technique and price criterion within the Federal Public Administration. Federal Official Gazette, Brasília, DF, Section 1, p. 22.
BRAZIL. (2021). Law No. 14,133, of April 1, 2021. Establishes the new Bidding and Administrative Contracts Law. Federal Official Gazette, Brasília, DF. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l14133.htm
BRUNO, T., ESPOSITO, G., GENOVESE, A., & PASSARO, R. (2018). The promise of Best Value Procurement: Governance and (in)stability of specifications within an innovative biogas project. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1465-1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.251
CHEAITOU, A., LARBI, R., & HOUSANI, B. A. (2019). Decision-making framework for tender evaluation and contractor selection in public organizations with risk considerations. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 68, 100620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2018.02.007
COTRIM, R. R., & RYNGELBLUM, A. L. (2023). The regulation of the new bidding law: Definition of the institutional logic prevalent in a field. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 27(2), e220078. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2023220078.en
ELLIS, J., WOOD, G., & KEEL, D. (2021). A case study of a negotiated tender within a small-to-medium construction contractor: Modelling project cost variance. Buildings, 11(6), 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11060260
FARAH, A., ALAWNEH, R., ELAYYAN, J., HYARAT, E., & ALSHDIEFAT, A. (2025). Impact of contractor selection criteria on project delays in Jordanian public construction projects. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(2), 101920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101920
GUO, F. (2025). Impact mechanism in circular public procurement: Empirical insights from traditional public procurement and public-private partnership in China. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 17(3), 122-142. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v17n3p122
KATAMUNA, H., MWANSA, B., & ZULU, M. (2025). The effect of public procurement processes on the performance of public projects in Zambia. Bussecon Review of Social Sciences, 7(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.36096/brss.v7i1.709
KOLOUR, H. R., MOMAYEZI, V., & MOMAYEZI, F. (2025). Enhancing supplier selection in public manufacturing: A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach. Spectrum of Decision Making and Applications, 3(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.31181/sdmap31202629
LESMANA, D. I., WITJAKSANA, B., & PURNAMA, J. (2025). Analysis of the construction tender process at the Bina Marga Public Works Office using the electronic procurement platform and the SWOT method. Injurity: Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(3), 96-106.
OECD. (2021). Fighting bid rigging in Brazil: A review of federal public procurement. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/competition/fighting-bid-rigging-in-brazil-a-review-of-federal-public-procurement.htm
OZ, B. (2024). A non-price-based tender evaluation methodology considering tenderers' self-confidence with partial value functions and time decay analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 252(A), 124186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124186
POUDEL, K. (2025). The procurement process of World Bank funded projects and government funded projects in Nepal: Exploring sustainability through procurement. Academia Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2, 153-164. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajhss.v2i1.77167
STELLER, F. (2018). Best Value Approach in Public Procurement: Improving "Best" through enhanced preparation phase. Journal for the Advancement of Performance Information and Value, 10(1), 66-83. https://doi.org/10.37265/japiv.v10i1.23
VINNA, A. D., & Latief, Y. (2025). Evaluation of the implementation of quality management system in risk-based construction services procurement process to improve contractor quality performance in PT XYZ. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis, 32(10s), 1-10.
WONG, C., Holt, G., & Cooper, P. (2000). Lowest price or value? Investigation of UK construction clients' tender selection process. Construction Management and Economics, 18(7), 767-774. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900433050
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2026 Christian Augusto Silva, Julio Cesar de Aguiar
Questo volume è pubblicato con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0 Internazionale.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à RDDA o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista (referência à RDDA).
- Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
