Geomorphological Evidences of Environmental Changes in Hope Bay, Antarctic Peninsula

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/rdg.v37i0.149173

Keywords:

Glacial Geomorphology, Glaciers, Upper Holocene, Sedimentology, Mapping

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to understand the glacial geomorphology of the proglacial environments of the Buenos Aires, Kenney and Flora glaciers in Hope Bay, Antarctica, between the coordinates 63° 23'S and 63° 26'S latitude and 56° 8'W and 57° 4'W longitude. Sedimentary, granulometric and morphological analyzes were carried out on 15 samples collected in 2017 for the identification of depositional geomorphological features and subsequent geomorphological mapping. The glacier fronts were delineated from Sentinel-2 and Quickbird images of 1988, 2008 and 2017 using the ARC GIS to identify the chronology of the shapes. The predominance of coarse grains, low selection, and high values ​​of C40 in all samples indicate modification by erosive processes in supraglacial environment and/or transport distance after substrate peeling and grain fracturing by post-depositional physical weathering . The reconstruction of the holocene landscape of Hope Bay indicates glaciers with tens of meters of advance compared to the current front during the Little Ice Age (LIA). The geomorphological mapping and performed analyzes show recent environmental changes in the proglacial system, with formation of Hummocky moraines indicating the retraction/stabilization of the glaciers in the LIA, and recent recession moraines, which in the Buenos Aires glacier predominate in the 2008-2017 phase, on the Flora glacier in the period 1988-2008 and the Kenney Glacier in the 2008-2017 period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Published

2019-07-04

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Costa, R. M., Petsch, C., Sotille, M. E., Rosa, K. K. da, Simões, J. C., Bremer, U. F., & Andrade, A. M. de. (2019). Geomorphological Evidences of Environmental Changes in Hope Bay, Antarctic Peninsula. Revista Do Departamento De Geografia, 37, 137-149. https://doi.org/10.11606/rdg.v37i0.149173