The influence of abusive supervision on employee engagement, stress and turnover intention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-02-2021-0025Keywords:
Abusive supervision, Leadership, Employee engagement, Stress, Turnover intentionAbstract
Purpose – The purpose of this research was to investigate the influence of abusive supervision on work engagement, stress, and turnover intention of subordinates. It was also proposed that work engagement and stress mediate the relationship between abusive supervision and turnover intention. Self-determination theory and the job demands-resources (JD-R) model provide the theoretical framework for our hypotheses.
Design/Methodology – The sample of this study consisted of 172 employees from public and private companies operating in different sectors of the economy. The hypotheses were tested through multiple regression analysis.
Findings – The results show that abusive supervision negatively influences engagement and contributes to increasing subordinates’ stress and turnover intention. We also found that the relationship between abusive supervision and turnover intention is mediated by engagement, but not by stress.
Limitations – Data was obtained from a convenience sample and cannot, therefore, be generalized.
Practical implications – The study results suggest that employees are prone to leave an organization when they are subordinated to abusive leaders, corroborating the idea that workers choose organizations but leave their leaders. This, in turn, reinforces the importance of adopting proper leadership selection and training processes.
Originality/value – This research addresses the dark side of the relationship between superiors and subordinates, which has been scarcely examined in the Brazilian literature. It also draws attention to different harmful consequences associated with dysfunctional behaviors of professionals that hold leadership positions in organizations.
Downloads
References
Abelha, D. M., Cavazotte, F. S. C. N., Niemeyer, J. R. L., & Villas Boas, O. T. (2020). O lado sombrio da força: A má liderança e suas consequências para os indivíduos e as organizações. Revista Economia e Gestão, 20(55), 38–58.
Alfes, K., Truss, C., Soane, E. C., Rees, C., & Gatenby, M. (2013). The relationship between line manager behavior, perceived HRM practices, and individual performance: examining the mediating role of engagement. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 839–859. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm
Almeida, J. G. (2018). Os fins justificam os meios? Desempenho, liderança abusiva e adoecimento. Tese de Doutorado, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasília.
Almeida, J. G., & Porto, J. B. (2019). Índice de clima ético: Evidências de validade da versão brasileira. RAM - Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 20(3), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMG190030
Anderson, S. E., Coffey, B. S., & Byerly, R. T. (2002). Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practices: Links to work-family conflict and job-related outcomes. Journal of Management, 28(6), 787–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(02)00190-3
Andrade, P. C., Aragão do Rosário, R., Moreira, T. A. P., & Reis Neto, A. C. (2019). A incidência de liderança tóxica em uma empresa multinacional do setor de call center. Revista de Carreiras e Pessoas, 9(3), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.20503/recape.v9i3.41214
Aquino, K., Griffeth, R. W., Allen, D. G., & Hom, P. W. (1997). Integrating justice constructs into the turnover process: A test of a referent cognitions model. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1208–1227. https://doi.org/10.2307/256933
Aryee, S., Sun, L.-Y., Chen, Z. X., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R Approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235
Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370802393649
Bliese, P. D., Edwards, J. R., & Sonnentag, S. (2017). Stress and well-being at work: A century of empirical trends reflecting theoretical and societal influences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 389–402.
Carasco-Saul, M., Kim, W., & Kim, T. (2015). Leadership and employee engagement: Proposing research agendas through a review of literature. Human Resource Development Review, 14(1), 38–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484314560406
Ceribeli, H. B., Fernandes, S. B., & Saraiva, C. M. (2021). Abusive supervision and the silence of trainees. Revista Fatec Zona Sul, 7(5), 1–18.
Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
Dai, Y.-D., Zhuang, W.-L., & Huan, T.-C. (2019). Engage or quit? The moderating role of abusive supervision between resilience, intention to leave and work engagement. Tourism Management, 70, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.07.014
Dhanani, L. Y., & LaPalme, M. L. (2019). It’s not personal: A review and theoretical integration of research on vicarious workplace mistreatment. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2322–2351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318816162
Einarsen, S., Aasland, M. S., & Skogstad, A. (2007). Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptual model. Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.002
Erickson, A., Shaw, B., Murray, J., & Branch, S. (2015). Destructive leadership: Causes, consequences and countermeasures. Organizational Dynamics, 44(4), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.09.003
Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600305
Hancock, J. I., Allen, D. G., Bosco, F. A., McDaniel, K. R., & Pierce, C. A. (2011). Meta-analytic review of employee turnover as a predictor of firm performance. Journal of Management, 39(3), 573–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311424943
Harms, P. D., Credé, M., Tynan, M., Leon, M., & Jeung, W. (2017). Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review. Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.006
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4-40.
Jensen, J. M., Patel, P. C., & Messersmith, J. G. (2013). High-performance work systems and job control: Consequences for anxiety, role overload, and turnover intentions. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1699–1724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311419663
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.
Kim, B. (Peter), Lee, G., & Carlson, K. D. (2010). An examination of the nature of the relationship between Leader-Member-Exchange (LMX) and turnover intent at different organizational levels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(4), 591–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.10.025
Li, P., Sun, J. M., Taris, T. W., Xing, L., & Peeters, M. C. W. (2021). Country differences in the relationship between leadership and employee engagement: A meta-analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 32(1), 101458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101458
Lipman-Blumen, J. (2005). The allure of toxic leaders: Why followers rarely escape their clutches. Ivey Business Journal, 69(3), 1–8.
Lyu, D., Ji, L., Zheng, Q., Yu, B., & Fan, Y. (2019). Abusive supervision and turnover intention: Mediating effects of psychological empowerment of nurses. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 6(2), 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.12.005
Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x
Mackey, J. D., Frieder, R. E., Brees, J. R., & Martinko, M. J. (2017). Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1940–1965. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315573997
Moin, M. F., Wei, F., Khan, A. N., Ali, A., & Chang, S. C. (2021). Abusive supervision and job outcomes: a moderated mediation model. Journal of Organizational Change Management, ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-05-2020-0132
Myers, D. G., & Dewall, C. N. (2019). Psicologia. 11ª Ed. Rio de Janeiro: LTC.
Oliveira, L. B., Cavazotte, F. S. C. N., & Paciello, R. R. (2013). Antecedentes e consequências dos conflitos entre trabalho e família. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 17(4), 418–437. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552013000400003
Padilla, A., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2007). The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments. Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.001
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, Vol. 12, pp. 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
Pradhan, S., & Jena, L. K. (2018). Abusive supervision and job outcomes: a moderated mediation study. Evidence-Based HRM, 6(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-06-2017-0030
Rattrie, L. T. B., Kittler, M. G., & Paul, K. I. (2020). Culture, burnout, and engagement: A meta-analysis on national cultural values as moderators in JD-R theory. Applied Psychology, 69(1), 176–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12209
Reina, C. S., Rogers, K. M., Peterson, S. J., Byron, K., & Hom, P. W. (2018). Quitting the boss? The role of manager influence tactics and employee emotional engagement in voluntary turnover. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 25(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051817709007
Richer, S. F., Blanchard, C., & Vallerand, R. J. (2002). A motivational model of work turnover. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(10), 2089–2113.
Ronena, S., & Donia, M. B. L. (2020). Stifling my fire: The impact of abusive supervision on employees’ motivation and ensuing outcomes at work. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 36(3), 205–214.
Rubenstein, A. L., Eberly, M. B., Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2018). Surveying the forest: A meta-analysis, moderator investigation, and future-oriented discussion of the antecedents of voluntary employee turnover. Personnel Psychology, 71(1), 23–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12226
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2019). Brick by brick: The origins, development, and future of self-determination theory. In Advances in Motivation Science (1st ed., Vol. 6). https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2019.01.001
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1042-6_4
Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Engaging leadership in the job demands-resources model. Career Development International, 20(5), 446–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-02-2015-0025
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Preliminary Manual. Occupational Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University.
Scheuer, M. L., Burton, J. P., Barber, L. K., Finkelstein, L. M., & Parker, C. P. (2016). Linking abusive supervision to employee engagement and exhaustion. Organization Management Journal, 13(3), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15416518.2016.1214063
Schilling, J. (2009). From ineffectiveness to destruction: A qualitative study on the meaning of negative leadership. Leadership, 5(1), 102–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715008098312
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 138–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.001
Silva, J. R., Balassiano, M., & Silva, A. R. L. (2014). Burocrata Proteano: Articulações de Carreira em torno e além do Setor Público. RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 18(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552014000100002
Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2013). Stress in organizations. In Weiner, I. B. (Ed.). Handbook of Psychology (pp. 560–592). 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei1218
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics. 7th ed., New York: Pearson.
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190.
Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300812
Tepper, B. J., Simon, L., & Park, H. M. (2017). Abusive supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 123–152.
Vazquez, A. C. S., Magnan, E. S., Pacico, J. C., Hutz, C. S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Adaptation and validation of the Brazilian version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Psico-USF, 20(2), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712015200202
Vogel, R. M., & Bolino, M. C. (2020). Recurring nightmares and silver linings: Understanding how past abusive supervision may lead to posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth. Academy of Management Review, 45(3), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2017.0350
Vogel, R. M., Mitchell, M. S., Tepper, B. J., Restubog, S. L. D., Hu, C., Hua, W. E. I., & Huang, J. (2015). A cross-cultural examination of subordinates’ perceptions of and reactions to abusive supervision. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(5), 720–745. https://doi.org/10.1002/job
Wang, C. C., Hsieh, H.-H., & Wang, Y.-D. (2020). Abusive supervision and employee engagement and satisfaction: the mediating role of employee silence. Personnel Review, 49(9), 1845–1858. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2019-0147
Watkins, T., Fehr, R., & He, W. (2019). Whatever it takes: Leaders’ perceptions of abusive supervision instrumentality. Leadership Quarterly, 30(2), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.09.002
Xu, J., & Thomas, H. C. (2011). How can leaders achieve high employee engagement? Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 32(4), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731111134661
Zhang, Y., & Liao, Z. (2015). Consequences of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4), 959–987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9425-0
