Editorial: Pressures and dilemmas in scientific publishing in management: building rigor, relevance, and global impact

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-01-2025-212

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hillman, A. (2021). Bringing the manager back in management, available from: https://aom.org/events/annual-meeting/annual-meeting-theme-2021 (accessed 10 June 2021).

Paula, A. P. P. de, & Gouvêa, R. B. (2023). A quem serve a pesquisa em administração?. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 27(2). doi: 10.1590/1982-7849rac2023210298.por.

Rajagopalan, N. (2020). Rigor, relevance, and resilience in management research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(2), 150–153. doi: 10.1177/1056492619861690.

Tsang, E., & Frey, B. (2007). The as-is journal review process: Let authors own their ideas. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(1), 128–136. doi: 10.5465/amle.2007.24401710.

Van de Ven, A. H. (1989). Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 486–489. doi: 10.5465/amr.1989.4308370.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-22

Issue

Vol. 32 No. 1 (2025)

Section

Editorial

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Luis Hernan Contreras Pinochet, Paula Sarita Bigio Schnaider, João Vinícius França Carvalho

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Editorial: Pressures and dilemmas in scientific publishing in management: building rigor, relevance, and global impact. (2025). REGE Revista De Gestão, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-01-2025-212