Innovation under pressures: analysis of practises in the port sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-10-2024-0154Keywords:
Institutional pressures, Innovation, Port sectorAbstract
PurposeThis study aims to assess the role of institutional pressure on innovation practices in the port sector.
Design/methodology/approachThis is a qualitative, exploratory, descriptive approach using remote interviews and asynchronous messaging with professionals from the Brazilian port sector.
FindingsCoercive pressures are highlighted by regulatory agencies that standardize and supervise port activities. Mimetic pressures lead to the adoption of competitive practices such as benchmarking and technical visits. On the other hand, normative pressures are related to ethical codes and social responsibilities, which influence innovation practises. These pressures have both direct and indirect effects on innovation in this sector.
Research limitations/implicationsThis study provides evidence of the influence of institutional pressures on innovation-related strategic decisions in the port sector.
Practical implicationsThis study reveals the importance of adequate public policies, including inter-port cooperation and organizational culture, to favor innovation.
Originality/valueThis study addresses the gap in professionals’ comprehension of the institutional pressures affecting innovation in the port sector, thus providing a pioneering approach to the factors involved in this process.
Downloads
References
Agência Nacional de Transportes Aquaviários – ANTAQ. (2023). Estatístico Aquaviário. Recuperado de https://web3.antaq.gov.br/ea/sense/index.html#
Acciaro, M. (2015). Corporate responsibility and value creation in the port sector. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 18(3), 291-311.
Acciaro, M., Ferrari, C., Lam, J. S., Macario, R., Roumboutsos, A., Sys, C., Tei, A., & Vanelslander, T. (2018). Are the innovation processes in seaport terminal operations successful?Maritime Policy & Management, 45(6), 787–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1466062
Acciaro, M., Ghiara, H., & Cusano, M. I. (2014). Energy management in seaports: A new role for port authorities. Energy Policy, 71, 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.013
Alshumrani, S., Baird, K., & Munir, R. (2022). Management innovation: the influence of institutional pressures and the impact on competitive advantage. International Journal of Manpower, 43(5), 1204–1220. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-05-2021-0291
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.
Bunduchi, R., Smart, A., Charles, K., McKee, L., & Azuara-Blanco, A. (2015). When innovation fails: An institutional perspective of the (non)adoption of boundary spanning IT innovation. Information & Management, 52(5), 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.04.001
Chu, Z., Xu, J., Lai, F., & Collins, B. J. (2018). Institutional Theory and Environmental Pressures: The Moderating Effect of Market Uncertainty on Innovation and Firm Performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,65(3), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2794453
Del Giudice, M., Di Vaio, A., Hassan, R., & Palladino, R. (2021). Digitalization and new technologies for sustainable business models at the ship–port interface: a bibliometric analysis. Maritime Policy & Management, 49(3), 410–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1903600
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Ferreira, M. A., Gondim, T. M. M., & Sá, A. A. D. C. S. (2019). Benchmarking ou isomorfismo mimético? uma análise à luz da Teoria de DiMaggio e Powell. Revista Multidisciplinar do Nordeste Mineiro, 2(1).
Fortin, I., & Oliver, D. (2016). To imitate or differentiate: Cross-level identity work in an innovation network. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 32(4), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2016.09.001
Haugstetter, H., & Cahoon, S. (2010). Strategic intent: Guiding port authorities to their new world? Research in Transportation Economics, 27(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2009.12.005
Ignasiak-Szulc, A., Juščius, V., & Bogatova, J. (2018). Economic Evaluation Model of Seaports’ Performance Outlining Competitive Advantages and Disadvantages. Engineering Economics, 29(5).https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.29.5.21363
Jiao, H., Yang, J., & Cui, Y. (2022). Institutional pressure and open innovation: the moderating effect of digital knowledge and experience-based knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(10), 2499–2527. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2021-0046
Khosravi, P., Newton, C., Rezvani, A., Ghanbarzadeh, R., & Akbari, M. (2023). Thriving in management innovation: an institutional perspective. European Journal of Innovation Management.https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2022-0524
Liao, Z. (2018). Institutional pressure, knowledge acquisition and a firm’s environmental innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 849–857. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2036
Martino, M., Errichiello, L., Marasco, A., & Morvillo, A. (2013). Logistics innovation in Seaports: An inter-organizational perspective. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 8, 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.05.001
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Molina, B., Ortiz-Rey, N., González-Cancelas, N., Soler-Flores, F., & Camarero-Orive, A. (2021). Use of the Blue Ocean Strategy to obtain ports 4.0. Ingeniería Y Competitividad, 23(1), e9466. https://doi.org/10.25100/iyc.v23i1.9466
Qi, G., Jia, Y., & Zou, H. (2021). Is institutional pressure the mother of green innovation? Examining the moderating effect of absorptive capacity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123957
Santos, M. G., Borini, F. M., Pereira, R. M., & Raziq, M. M. (2020). Institutional pressures and the diffusion of organisational innovation: evidence from Brazilian firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(7), 869–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1718089
Song, B., & Zhao, Z. (2021). Institutional pressures and cluster firms’ ambidextrous innovation: the mediating role of strategic cognition. Chinese Management Studies, 15(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-11-2019-0397
Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036518
Watanabe, R. M., & Senoo, D. (2009). The effect of institutional pressures on knowledge management and the resulting innovation: the case of the smartcard in France. International Journal of Intelligent Enterprise, 1(2), 177. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIE.2009.024410
Wiegmans, B. W., & Geerlings, H. (2010). Sustainable port innovations: barriers and enablers for successful implementation. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 3(3), 230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/WRITR.2010.034664
Yoshiura, L. J. M., Ensslin, S. R., Vaz, C. R., & Maldonado, M. U. (2022). O impacto das inovações na evolução do setor portuário: uma revisão de literatura. Revista Eletrônica de Estratégia & Negócios, 15, 3-26.
Zhu, D., Zhu, H., & Arkorful, V. E. (2023). Institutional Pressure and Eco-innovation: The Moderating Role of Environmental Uncertainty. Science, Technology and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/09717218231201945
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rosana Santos de Oliveira, Carlos Eduardo Facin Lavarda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
