Transparency and dialog in non-financial reports

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-10-2025-0159

Keywords:

Dialogic accounting, Stakeholders, Accountability, ESG disclosure

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to examine how the normative principles of critical dialogic accounting, according to Brown (2009), are incorporated into non-financial reports, fostering transparency and dialog with stakeholders.

Design/methodology/approach

This study is a qualitative study based on documentary analysis and thematic content analysis of sustainability reports (2020–2024) from a multinational company in the aluminum industry.

Findings

The company employs a hybrid disclosure model, which shows significant progress in transparency and information diversity, but with structural limitations regarding participation, inclusion of critical voices and democratization of reporting, revealing a mostly formal, selective and non-substantive incorporation of the principles of dialogic accounting.

Research limitations/implications

An exclusive documentary analysis limits the understanding of internal processes and the effective influence of stakeholders.

Practical implications

The study suggests improving reports through more transparent, participatory and dialog-oriented practices.

Social implications

Transparency plays a key role in strengthening accountability, especially in contexts of socio-environmental conflict.

Originality/value

The study shows that dialogic accounting takes on hybrid forms in corporate contexts, with a selective incorporation of the principles and limitations associated with organizational control.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angotti, M., Ferreira, A., & Eugénio, T. (2019). Full Cost Accounting e Contabilidade Dialógica aplicados para Avaliação da (In) Sustentabilidade da Mineração: O caso de Congonhas (MG). In VI Conferência Sul-americana de Contabilidade Ambiental–CSCA, Santa Catarina, Brasil, 29-30 agosto. http://www.csearsouthamerica.net/events/index.php/csca/csca2019

Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.

Bebbington, J., Unerman, J., & O'Dwyer, B. (2014).Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315848419

Bellucci, M., Simoni, L., Acuti, D., & Manetti, G. (2019). Stakeholder engagement and dialogic accounting: Empirical evidence in sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,32(5), 1467-1499. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2017-3158

Bevilaqua, I., & Freire, F. S. (2023). Oportunidades e desafios do relato integrado a partir dos princípios do dialogic accounting e do engajamento dos stakeholders. Contextus – Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão, 21, e81294. https://doi.org/10.19094/contextus.2023.81294

Boiral, O., & Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. (2020). Sustainability reporting assurance: Creating stakeholder accountability through hyperreality? Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118596

Brito, M. A. S., Souza Freire, F., & Silva, N. O. (2022). Contabilidade Dialógica e Relatórios de Sustentabilidade: o caso do Grupo Empresarial Monsanto. REUNIR Revista de Administração Contabilidade e Sustentabilidade, 12(2), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.18696/reunir.v12i2.1172

Broccardo, L., & Mauro, S. G. (2024). The path towards sustainability: The role of internal stakeholders and management accounting in a dialogic perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(3), 2496–2513. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2697

Brown, J. (2009). Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(3), 313–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2008.08.002

Brown, J., & Dillard, J. (2013). Agonizing over engagement: SEA and the “death of environmentalism” debates. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.09.001

Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994

Cooper, S. M., & Owen, D. L. (2007). Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: The missing link. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.001

Crane, A., & Glozer, S. (2016). Researching corporate social responsibility communication: Themes, opportunities and challenges. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1223–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12196

Dillard, J., & Roslender, R. (2011). Taking pluralism seriously: Embedded moralities in management accounting and control systems. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2010.06.014

Dillard, J., & Vinnari, E. (2017). A case study of critique: Critical perspectives on critical accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43, 88–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.09.004

Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2010). One Report: Integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119199960

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Freire, F., Silva, N. O. D., Lugon, A. G., & Carvalho, E. R. O. D. (2019). Dialogic accounting para sistema democrático de informação: Analisando o caso do Programa Bolsa Verde. Sociedade, Contabilidade e Gestão, 14(4), 56–79. https://doi.org/10.21446/scg_ufrj.v14i4.27071

Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Prentice Hall.

GRI [Global Reporting Initiative] & Stealth Agents. (2022). GRI standards and transparency in sustainability reporting.https://www.globalreporting.org

Hines, R. D. (1988). Financial accounting: In communicating reality, we construct reality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(3), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(88)90003-7

IASB [International Accounting Standards Board]. (2021). IFRS S1 and S2: General requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information and climate-related disclosures. IFRS Foundation. https://www.ifrs.org

IFRS [International Financial Reporting Standards]. (2021). IFRS sustainability disclosure standards. IFRS Foundation. https://www.ifrs.org

Ilhan, E., Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Climate risk disclosure and institutional investors. ECGI Working Paper Series in Finance, N° 661/2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3437178

Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler [KPMG]. (2023). O avanço do ESG no Brasil: Como empresas estão se adaptando aos critérios ambientais, sociais e de governança. KPMG Brasil. https://home.kpmg/br

Lehman, G. (2006). Perspectives on language, accountability and critical accounting: An interpretative perspective. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17(6), 755–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2005.02.002

Lock, I., & Schulz-Knappe, C. (2019). Credible corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication predicts legitimacy: Evidence from an experimental study. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-07-2018-0071

Mané, I., Carvalho, M. F. N., Palheta, J. M., & Silva, C. N. (2022). Impactos socioambientais relacionados à exploração da bauxita no município de Barcarena, região Norte do Brasil. Revista GeoAmazônia, 10(20). https://doi.org/10.18542/geo.v10i20.13647

Mantovani, M. M., Ferreira, D. H. L., Mariosa, D. F., & Branchi, B. A. (2023). Relatórios de sustentabilidade: Análise das principais normas e estruturas utilizadas.In International Workshop Sustentare & Wipis, November 22-24 (online). https://www.even3.com.br/sustentare-wipis-2023-311985/

Marques, L. S., & Pertile, L. C. (2025). Estudo da contabilidade ambiental, social e de governança (ESG) e sua aplicação nas empresas brasileiras. Revista FT, 29(143), 44–45. https://doi.org/10.69849/revistaft/fa10202502271444

Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8

Ministério de Minas e Energia [MME]. (2021). Perfil da mineração de bauxita. https://www.gov.br/mme/pt-br/assuntos/secretarias/geologia-mineracao-e-transformacao-mineral/relatorios-de-apoio-ao-pnm-2030-projeto-estal-1/a-mineracao-brasileira/documentos/p11_rt22_perfil_da_mineraxo_de_bauxita.pdf

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of the who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105

Molisa, P. (2011). A spiritual reflection on emancipation and accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(5), 453–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2011.01.004

Norsk Hydro. (2020–2024). Relatórios de sustentabilidade e relatórios integrados. https://www.hydro.com/pt-BR/sustentabilidade/relatorios-e-documentos/

Nunes, G. S. (2025). Uma análise acerca da responsabilização civil ambiental e da judicialização transnacional de demandas ambientais à luz do Caso Norsk Hydro. https://sistemas2.uespi.br/bitstream/tede/2210/2/Monografia%20Completa.pdf

Oliveira, E. A. B, Haro, G. P. B., & Martins, J. D. D. (2024). Responsabilidade socioambiental corporativa: o diferencial competitivo que promove o desenvolvimento sustentável. Revista Direito Ambiental E Sociedade, 14(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.18226/22370021.v14.n1.16

Roble, G. L. de E., Basante, J. G., Oliveira, M. do C., & Stenzel Rimonato, I. P. de O. (2024). ESG construindo diferenças corporativas, através de estratégias direcionadas para os pilares Transparência e Accountability. Revista Metropolitana de Governança Corporativa, 8(1). https://revistaseletronicas.fmu.br/index.php/RMGC/article/view/3234

Russell, S., Milne, M. J., & Dey, C. (2017). Accounts of nature and the nature of accounts: Critical reflections on environmental accounting and propositions for ecologically informed accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(7), 1426–1458. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2017-3010

Schultz, F., Castello, I., & Morsing, M. (2013). The construction of corporate social responsibility in network societies: A communication view. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1826-8

Shearer, T. (2002). Ethics and accountability: From the for-itself to the for-the-other. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(6), 541–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00036-8

Silva, D. C., Oliveira, T. M. C., & Pessina, M. E. H. (2024). Evolução dos fundos ESG no Brasil. Revista de Desenvolvimento Econômico (RDE), 26(55), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.36810/rde.v1i55.9175

Tang, S., & Higgins, C. (2022). Do not forget the “how” along with the “what”: Improving the transparency of sustainability reports. California Management Review, 65(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256221094876

Tanima, F., Brown, J., & Hopper, T. (2024). Critical dialogic accounting for engaging multiple stakeholders: Insights from civil society accountability practices. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 100, 102786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102786

Thomson, I., & Bebbington, J. (2005). Social and environmental reporting in the UK: A pedagogic evaluation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(5), 507–533.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2003.06.003

Downloads

Published

2026-01-23

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Transparency and dialog in non-financial reports. (2026). REGE Revista De Gestão, 33. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-10-2025-0159