The satisfaction assessment of intrauterine device T CU 380A users followed in the ambulatory of family planning in a teaching hospital in Recife, Pernambuco
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1679-9836.v99i6p538-544Keywords:
Family planning, Birth control methods, IUDAbstract
Objectives: to evaluate the satisfaction of women who are using the IUD T Cu 380 A; to show their sociodemographic profile, and to establish the impact of IMIP`s family planning class in their selection of the IUD T Cu 380 A as birth control method. Methods: It´s a descriptive, quantitative, and cross-sectional study performed between September 2016 and June 2017 with 97 users of IUD T Cu 380 A followed up at the family planning ambulatory of the Medical Institute Professor Fernando Figueira (IMIP).The patients were interviewed and answered a pre-formulated questionnaire related to their sociodemographic aspects and their experience with the intrauterine device. Results: 93,8% were satisfied with the method, 47,4% were older than 35 years-old, 84,5% were married or had a spouse, 59,7% had about eight to 11 years of education, 55,7% had monthly income up to R$ 880,00, 67,0% recognized the relevance of the family planning class to select the IUD T Cu 380 A as their contraceptive method. Conclusion: The higher degree of satisfaction of women using the IUD T Cu 380 A ensures its relevance as a contraceptive method. Lectures about family planning should always be encouraged at women’s reproductive health assistance services.
Downloads
References
Coelho EA, Lucena MF, Silva AT. O planejamento familiar no Brasil no contexto das políticas públicas de saúde: determinantes históricos. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2000;34(1):37-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0080-62342000000100005
Portal Brasil. Planejamento familiar [citado 05 abr. 2016]. Disponível em: http://www.brasil.gov.br/saude/2011/09/planejamento-familiar.
Santos JC, Freitas PM. Planejamento familiar na perspectiva do desenvolvimento, Santo Antônio de Jesus (BA). Ciên Saúde Coletiva. 2011;16(3):1813-20.
Portal Brasil. SUS oferece oito opções de métodos contraceptivos [citado 05 abr. 2016]. Disponível em: http://www.brasil.gov.br/saude/2012/03/sus-oferece-oito-opcoes-de-metodos-contraceptivos.
Equipe Editorial Bibliomed. Desempenho do DIU [citado 14 abr. 2016]. Disponível em: http://www.bibliomed.com.br/lib/showdoc.cfm?LibDocID=12025&titulo=03-desempenho-do-diu.html.
Patai K, Szilagyi G, Noszal B, Szentmariay I. Local tissue effects of copper-containing intrauterine devices. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(5):1281-3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(03)01171-3.
Giordanno MV; Giordano LA, Panisset KS. Dispositivo intrauterino de cobre. Femina. 2015;43(1):16-20. Disponível em: http://files.bvs.br/upload/S/0100-7254/2015/v43nsuppl1/a4850.pdf.
Holanda AAR, Barreto CFB, Mota KB, Medeiros RD, Maranhão TMO, Holanda JCP. Controvérsias acerca do dispositivo intrauterino: uma revisão. Femina. 2013;41(3). Disponível em: http://files.bvs.br/upload/S/0100-7254/2013/v41n3/a3812.pdf.
Poli MEH, Mello CR, Machado RB, Pinho Neto JS, Spinola PG, Tomás G, et al. Manual de anticoncepção da FEBRASGO [Editorial]. Femina. 2009;37(9):459-92. Disponível em: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4232752/mod_resource/content/1/Femina-v37n9_Editorial.pdf.
Vieira CS, Brito MB, Yazlle MEHD. Contracepção no puerpério. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2008;30(9):470-9. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032008000900008.
Sugimoto L. Grupo de mulheres usa o mesmo DIU por 16 anos, sem troca e sem gravidez. J Unicamp. 2005;310.
Bahamondes L. A escolha do método contraceptivo [editorial]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2006;28(5):267-70. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032006000500001.
de Holanda AA, Pessoa Ade M, Holanda Jde C, de Melo MH, Maranhão TM. Adequação do dispositivo intrauterino pela avaliação ultrassonográfca: inserção pós-parto e pós-abortamento versus inserção durante o ciclo menstrual. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2013;35(8):373-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-72032013000800007.
Regianini HA. Perfil das pacientes submetidas à inserção de dispositivo intra-uterino no centro de saúde dos ingleses [TCC]. Florianópolis: Curso de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; 2009. https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/119711.
Organização Mundial de Saúde. Departamento de Saúde Reprodutiva e Pesquisas. Planejamento familiar: um manual global para profissionais e serviços de saúde [citado 20 jul. 2017]. Disponível em: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44028/6/9780978856304_por.pdf.
da Silva RM, de Araújo KN, Bastos LA, Moura ER. Planejamento familiar: significado para mulheres em idade reprodutiva. Cien Saude Coletiva. 2011;16(5):2415-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-81232011000500010.
Thiery M, Laufe L, Parewijck W, et al. Immediate postplacental IUD insertion: a randomized trial of sutured (Lippes Loop and TCu22OC) and non-sutured (TCu22OC) models. Contraception. 1983;28(4):299-313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-7824(83)90032-x.
Kisnisci H, Champion CB. A study of delta intrauterine devices in Ankara, Turkey. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1985;23(1):51-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(85)90011-6.
Deans EI, Grimes DA. Intrauterine devices for adolescents: a systematic review. Contraception. 2009;79(6):418-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2008.12.009.
Díaz J, Bahamondes L, Díaz M, Marchi N, Faúndes A, Marini M. Evaluation of the performance of the copper T380A IUD up to ten years. Is this IUD a reversible but potentially permanent method? Adv Contracept. 1992;8(4):275-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02042585.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Luciana Figueirôa de Siqueira Campos, Maria Laura Pottes Carvalho, Raquel Nogueira Cordeira Laurentino Lima, Diego Laurentino Lima, Rita de Cássia Coelho Moraes de Brito, Carlos Campos Leal Júnior
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
