Risk factors and primary indication for cesarean section in pregnant women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1679-9836.v104iesp.e-231504

Keywords:

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, Risk factors, Cesarean section

Abstract

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is a common pregnancy complication and is linked to high cesarean rates, particularly in Brazil, where national data on the subject is limited. This study analyzed risk factors and primary indications for c-sections among GDM-affected pregnancies. It included a retrospective cohort of women receiving prenatal care at a tertiary hospital from January 2012 to March 2020, totaling 866 cases that met criteria: diagnosed GDM, pregnancies beyond 20 weeks, and delivery at this hospital. The cohort was divided into VAGINAL and CESAREAN groups, with statistical comparisons made between them. Of the 866 cases, 323 (37.3%) were vaginal deliveries, and 545 (62.7%) were c-sections. Primary indications for c-section included prior uterine surgeries (20.07%), iterative c-section (18.78%), fetal distress (9.76% intrapartum; 8.84% antepartum), non-cephalic presentation (7.37%), and functional dystocia (7.0%). Univariate analysis identified several factors associated with higher c-section risk, such as advanced maternal age (p<0.001), higher BMI (p=0.016), previous c-sections (p<0.001), hypertension (p=0.024), high glucose levels during pregnancy (p=0.031 for early fasting plasma glucose; p=0.002 for 1h and p<0.001 for 2h after glucose overload), nulliparity (p=0.012), multiple gestation (p<0.001), preeclampsia (p=0.012), and placenta previa (p=0.010). Conversely, spontaneous labor onset (p<0.001) and preterm labor (p=0.001) were associated with lower c-section rates. Multivariate analysis confirmed that age (OR 1,048), nulliparity (OR 2.892), previous c-section (OR 14.49), and spontaneous labor onset (OR 0.199) were independent predictors of c-section. The findings emphasize that prior uterine scars significantly increase c-section risk. In contrast, spontaneous labor onset reduces this risk by almost 80%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde. Ministério da Saúde. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. Sociedade Brasileira de Diabetes. Rastreamento e diagnóstico de diabetes mellitus gestacional no Brasil. Brasília, DF: OPAS, 2016. ISBN: 978-85-7967-118-0. https://www.febrasgo.org.br/images/pec/CNE_pdfs/Rastreamento-Diabetes.pdf.

Organização Mundial da Saúde. Declaração da OMS sobre as taxas de cesárea. 2015. Disponível em: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_RHR_15.02_por.pdf;jsessionid=C6DFB601563EDA53B2911CC18D3DC192?sequence=3.

Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6):e005671. Doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671

Nakamura-Pereira M, do Carmo Leal M, Esteves-Pereira AP, Domingues RM, Torres JA, Dias MA, Moreira ME. Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth. Reprod Health. 2016;17(13) Suppl 3:128. Doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0228-7

Zeki R, Oats JJN, Wang AY, Li Z, Homer CSE, Sullivan EA. Cesarean section and diabetes during pregnancy: An NSW population study using the Robson classification. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44(5):890-8. Doi: 10.1111/jog.13605.

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australia's Mothers and Babies 2021: In Brief. Canberra: AIHW, 2023. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/mothers-babies/australias-mothers-and-babies-2021.

Published

2025-02-26

How to Cite

Francisco, R. P. V., Oliveira, A. P. V. de, Bernardi, M. D. C., Zaccara, T. A., Paganoti , C. de F., Mikami, F. C. F., & Costa , R. A. da. (2025). Risk factors and primary indication for cesarean section in pregnant women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Revista De Medicina, 104(esp.), e-231504. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1679-9836.v104iesp.e-231504