Duodenopancreatectomy: histopathological analysis of periampullary tumors

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1679-9836.v99i4p366-373

Keywords:

Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Abdominal neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma

Abstract

Introduction: Cephalic Gastropancreato-duodenectomy (CGDP) is the surgery of choice for the treatment of periampullary cancers. Patients with this disease have a 5-year survival rate of 20% to 50%, being related to the resection status, stage of the disease, and tumor location. To know the biological behavior of periampullary tumors allows to plan the treatment, and the follow-up of these patients. Method: The study analyzed 105 patients through histopathological results of surgical parts of CGDP. Data regarding origin, tumor size, lymph node status, perineural invasion, angiolymphatic invasion, surgical resection margins, and differentiation of tumor were collected, and compared with the current literature. Results: Patients with malignant neoplasms were 94 (89.5%) of those who went through CGDPs. Forty percent (42) of those were pancreatic tumors, 37% (39) were duodenal papillary tumors (Vater papilla), 4% (4) had duodenal origin and 2% were distal common bile duct tumors. The mean size of the tumors was 3.43cm (p = 0.049), with 85% of the tumors larger than 2cm and 46 (52.9%) of the adenocarcinomas were stage T3. Lymph nodes were positive in 27.6% of the adenocarcinomas and the margin was R0 in 87% of the patients. Conclusion: The biological behavior of periampullary tumors is of great importance for patients who have undergone CGDP. Better treatment planning and follow-up may be offered when the histological type of these tumors is known. The experience of the centers in this surgical procedure is of important relevance in the results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Fabio Eduardo Revorêdo Rabelo Ferreira, Hospital Getúlio Vargas (HGV)

    Cirurgião Digestivo do Hospital Getúlio Vargas (HGV), Recife, Brasil.

  • Adalberto Guido Araújo, Hospital Getúlio Vargas (HGV)

    Cirurgião do Departamento de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo, Hospital Getúlio Vargas, Recife, Brasil

  • Balduíno Guedes Nóbrega Júnior, Hospital Getúlio Vargas (HGV)

    Cirurgião Geral do Hospital Getúlio Vargas (HGV), Recife, Brasil.

  • Henrique Guido Araújo, Hospital Getúlio Vargas (HGV)

    Cirurgião Geral do Hospital Getúlio Vargas (HGV), Recife, Brasil.

  • Diego Laurentino Lima, Hospital dos Servidores do Estado de Pernambuco (HSE)

    Residente de Cirurgia Geral do Hospital dos Servidores do Estado de Pernambuco (HSE), Recife, Brasil.

  • Raquel Nogueira C. L. Lima, Faculdade Pernambucana de Saúde (FPS)

    Médica e Pesquisadora. Faculdade Pernambucana de Saúde (FPS), Recife, PE.

References

Lu F, Soares KC, He J, Javed AA, Cameron JL, Rezaee N, Pawlik TM, Wolfgang CL, Weiss MJ. Neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgical resection for previously explored pancreatic cancer patients is associated with improved survival. Hepatobil Surg Nutr. 2017;6(3):144-153. doi: https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn.2016.08.06.

Konstantinidis IT, Warshaw AL, Allen JN, Blaszkowsky LS, Castillo CF, Deshpande V, Hong TS, Kwak EL, Lauwers GY, Ryan DP, Wargo JA, Lillemoe KD, Ferrone CR. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: is there a survival difference for r1 resections versus locally advanced unresectable tumors? What is a “true” R0 Resection? Ann Surg. 2013;257(4):731-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318263da2f.

Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer zum Büschenfelde C, Friess H, Kleeff J. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med. 2010;7(4):e1000267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000267.

He J, Ahuja N, Makary MA, Cameron JL, Eckhauser FE, Choti MA, Hruban RH, Pawlik TM, Wolfgang CL. 2564 resected periampullary adenocarcinomas at a single institution: trends over three decades. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16(1):83-90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12078.

Pawlik TM, Gleisner AL, Cameron JL, Winter JM, Assumpcao L, Lillemoe KD, Wolfgang C, Hruban RH, Schulick RD, Yeo CJ, Choti MA. Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 2007;141(5):610-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2006.12.013.

Riediger H, Keck T, Wellner U, zur Hausen A, Adam U, Hopt UT, Makowiec F. The Lymph Node Ratio is the Strongest Prognostic Factor after Resection of Pancreatic Cancer. J Gastroint Surg. 2009;13(7):1337-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0919-2.

Zhan H, Xu J, Wang L, Zhang G, Hu S. Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor for patients after resection of pancreatic cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0510-0.

Baldwin S, Kukar M, Gabriel E, et al. Pancreatic cancer metastatic to a limited number of lymph nodes has no impact on outcome. HPB. 2016;18(6):523-528. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.02.004.

Washington K, Berlin J, Branton P, Burgart LJ, Carter DK, Compton CC, Fitzgibbons P, Frankel WL, Jessup J, Kakar S, Minsky B, Nakhleh R, Tang LH, Vauthey JN. Protocol for the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Carcinoma of the Ampulla of Vater. College of American Pathologists. Protocol web posting date: January, 2016. Based on AJCC/ UICC TNM. 7th ed. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bassel_El-Rayes/publication/273785608_Substaging_Nodal_Status_in_Ampullary_Carcinomas_has_Significant_Prognostic_Value_Proposed_Revised_Staging_Based_on_an_Analysis_of_313_Well-Characterized_Cases/links/5670324508ae0d8b0cc0dc98.pdf

Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, Asbun H, Bain A, Behrman SW, Benson AB, Binder E, Cardin DB, Cha C, Chiorean E, Chung V, Czito B, Dillhoff M, Dotan E, Ferrone CR, Hardacre J, Hawkins WG, Herman J, Ko AH, Komanduri S, Koong A, LoConte N, Lowy AM, Moravek C, Nakakura EK, O’Reilly EM, Obando J, Reddy S, Scaife C, Thayer S, Weekes CD, Wolff RA, Wolpin BM, Burns J, Darlow S. (2017). Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020;15(8):1028-61. Retrieved Jul 13, 2020. Available from: https://jnccn.org/view/journals/jnccn/15/8/article-p1028.xml.

Hyder O, Dodson RM, Nathan H, Schneider EB, Weiss MJ, Cameron JL, Choti MA, Makary MA, Hirose K, Wolfgang CL, Herman JM, Pawlik TM. Influence of patient, physician, and hospital factors on 30-day readmission following pancreatoduodenectomy in the United States. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(12):1095-102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2509.

American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system, September 6, 2013. American Cancer Society; 2016 [cited January 4, 2017]. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/cancer/pancreaticcancer/detailedguide/pancreatic-cancer-staging.

Radojkovic M, Stojanovic M, Radojković D, Jeremic L, Mihailovic D, Ilic I. Histopathologic differentiation as a prognostic factor in patients with carcinoma of the hepatopancreatic ampulla of Vater. J Int Med Res. 2018:300060518786920. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060518786920.

Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Koniaris L, Kaushal S, Abrams RA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Hruban RH, Lillemoe KD. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4(6):567-79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1091-255x(00)80105-5.

Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Sitzman JV, Hruban RH, Goodman SN, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas. 201 patients. Ann Surg. 1995;221:721-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199506000-00011.

Elberm H, Ravikumar R, Sabin C, Abu Hilal M, Al-Hilliv A, Aroori S, Bond-Smith G, Bramhall S, Coldham C, Hammond J, Hutchins R, Imber C, Preziosi G, Saleh A, Silva M, Simpson J, Spoletini G, Stell D, Terrace J, White S, Wigmore S, Fusai G. Outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy for T3 adenocarcinoma: A multivariable analysis from the UK Vascular Resection for Pancreatic Cancer Study Group. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(11):1500-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2015.08.158.

Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Arnold MA, Chang DC, Coleman J, Hodgin MB, Sauter PK, Hruban RH, Riall TS, Schulick RD, Choti MA, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(9):1199-210; discussion 1210-1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2006.08.018.

Lim JE, Chien MW, Earle CC. Prognostic factors following curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based, linked database analysis of 396 patients. Ann Surg. 2003;237(1):74-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200301000-00011.

Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV, McMahon MJ, Guillou PJ, Anthoney A. Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93(10):1232-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5397.

Menon KV, Gomez D, Smith AM, Anthoney A, Verbeke CS. Menon et al Impact of margin status on survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer: the Leeds Pathology Protocol (LEEPP). HPB (Oxford). 2009;11(1):18-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2008.00013.x.

Hatzaras I, George N, Muscarella P, Melvin WS, Ellison EC, Bloomston M. Predictors of survival in periampullary cancers following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17(4):991-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0883-9.

Chandrasegaram MD, Chiam SC, Chen JW, Khalid A, Mittinty ML, Neo EL, Tan CP, Dolan PM, Brooke-Smith ME, Kanhere H, Worthley CS. Distribution and pathological features of pancreatic, ampullary, biliary and duodenal cancers resected with pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-015-0498-5.

Hellan M, Sun CL, Artinyan A, Mojica-Manosa P, Bhatia S, Ellenhorn JDI, Kim J. The impact of lymph node number on survival in patients with lymph node-negative pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2008;37(1):19-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0b013e31816074c9.

Published

2020-08-28

Issue

Section

Artigos/Articles

How to Cite

Ferreira, F. E. R. R., Araújo, A. G., Nóbrega Júnior, B. G., Araújo, H. G., Lima, D. L., & Lima, R. N. C. L. (2020). Duodenopancreatectomy: histopathological analysis of periampullary tumors. Revista De Medicina, 99(4), 366-373. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1679-9836.v99i4p366-373