Evaluation of the implementation of a training referred to pressure injury prevention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1679-9836.v101i6e-192303Keywords:
Pressure ulcer, Inservice training, Simulation training, Patient safety, NursingAbstract
Objective: evaluate the implementation of a training program for pressure injury prevention measures, using validated instruments. Methodology: almost experimental study, developed in four stages: validation of the contents of an audit instrument for evaluation of the implementation of pressure injury prevention measures; auditing to evaluate the prevention measures implemented; educational intervention with face validity of a questionnaire to assess learning; repetition of the audit, two months after the educational intervention. Results: the validation reached a percentage of agreement among experts above 0.9. In the first audit, the average of conformities that were found out, was 65.1%. The learning assessment score before the intervention was 7.99 and after 8.45 (p<0.0001). In the second audit, the average of conformities that were found out, was 56.2%. Conclusion: the implementation of a training program for pressure injury prevention measures contributes to increase the participants’ level of knowledge, however, there was no translation of the acquired knowledge into clinical practice. Instrument validation was satisfactory.
Downloads
References
World Health Organization (WHO). World alliance for patient safety, taxonomy: the conceptual framework for the international classification for patient safety: final technical report. Genebra: World Health Organization; 2009 [cited 2021 Oct 10]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/70882
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Programa Nacional de Segurança do Paciente. Protocolos básicos de segurança do paciente. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2016 [citado 15 out. 2021]. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/documento_referencia_programa_nacional_seguranca.pdf
European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries: clinical practice guideline. 2019 [cited 2021 Oct 16]. Available from: https://internationalguideline.com/guideline
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Relatórios de eventos adversos notificados à ANVISA. Brasília; 2020 [citado 91 out. 2021]. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/assuntos/servicosdesaude/notificacoes/notificacao-de-incidentes-eventos-adversos-nao-infecciosos-relacionados-a-assistencia-a-saude/relatorios-de-incidentes-eventos-adversos-relacionados-a-assistencia-a-saude/BR_2014__2021_1.pdf
Li Z, Lina F, Thalibb L, Chaboyer W. Global prevalence and incidence of pressure injuries in hospitalized adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;105:103546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103546
Tirgar B, Mirshekari L, Forouzi MA. Pressure injury prevention: knowledge and attitudes of Iranian intensive care nurses. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2018;31(4):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000530848.50085.ef
Barakat-Johnson M, Barnett C, Wand T, White K. Knowledge and attitudes of nurses toward pressure injury prevention: a cross-sectional multisite study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2018;45(3):233-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000430
Aydin AK, Karadag A, Gül S, Avsar P, Baykara AG. Nurses’ knowledge and practices related to pressure injury a cross-sectional study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2019;46(2):117-123. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000517
Jeffries PR, Rogers K. Theoretical framework for simulation design. In: Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation. 2nd ed. New York: National League for Nursing; 2012.
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: quick reference guide. Osborne Park (AUS): NPUAP, EPUAP, PPPIA; 2014 [cited 2021 Oct 20]. Available from: https://www.epuap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/quick-reference-guide-digital-npuap-epuap-pppia-jan2016.pdf
Coluci MZO, Alexandre NMC, Milani D. Construção de instrumentos de medida na área da saúde. Ciên Saúde Coletiva. 2015;20(3):925-36. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015203.04332013
Paranhos WY, Santos VLCG. Avaliação de risco para úlceras de pressão por meio da escala de Braden, na língua portuguesa. Rev Esc Enf Univ São Paulo. 1999;33(n. espec.):191-206. Disponível em: http://www.ee.usp.br/reeusp/upload/pdF/799.pdf
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. O estudo COSMIN alcançou um consenso internacional sobre taxonomia, terminologia e definições de propriedades de medição para resultados relatados por pacientes relacionados à saúde. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.
Beeckman D, Defloor T, Schoonhoven L, Vanderwee K. Knowledge and attitudes of nurses on pressure ulcer prevention: a cross-sectional multicenter study in belgian hospitals. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2011;8(3):166-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6787.2011.00217.x
Van Gelderen SC, Zegers M, Boeijen W, Westert GP, Robben PB, Wollersheim HC. Evaluation of the organization and effectiveness of internal audits to govern patient safety in hospitals: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e015506. http://dx.doi. org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016- 015506
Rutherford-Hemming T, Alfes MC. The Use of Hospital-Based Simulation in Nursing Education A systematic review. Clin Simulation Nursing. 2017;13(2):78-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.12.007
Dilie A, Mengistu D. Assessment of nurses’ knowledge, attitude, and perceived barriers to expressed pressure ulcer prevention practice in Addis Ababa Government Hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2015. Adv Nurs. 2015:ID796927. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/796927
Olkoski E, Assis GA. Application of measures for preventing pressure ulcers by the nursing team before and after an education campaign. Esc Anna Nery. 2016;20(2):363-369. https://doi.org/10.5935/1414-8145.20160050
Shaver B, Eyerly-Webb SA, Gibney Z, Silverman L, Pineda C, Solomon RJ. Trauma and intensive care nursing knowledge and attitude of foley catheter insertion and maintenance. J Trauma Nur. 2018;25(1):66-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/jtn.0000000000000344
Porter-Armstrong AP, Moore ZE, Bradbury I, McDonough S. Education of healthcare professionals for preventing pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;25;5(5):CD011620. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011620.pub2
Kirkpatrick DL. Evaluation training programs: the four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler; 1994.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Carolina Pinto Martins, Vanessa Abreu da Silva, Angélica Olivetto de Almeida, Ivan Rogério Antunes, Alessandra Nazareth Cainé Pereira Roscani, Renata Cristina Gasparino
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
