Preoperative assessment in low complexity outpatient dermatologic surgery

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1679-9836.v102i4e-204196

Keywords:

Perioperative care, Cardiovascular risk, Heart complications

Abstract

Introduction: The preoperative evaluation provides data about the patient, which will help in the preparation of the surgery. In outpatient, low-complexity surgeries, the criteria for carrying out this evaluation are not well defined in the guidelines. Objective: to compare assessment strategies and their impact on perioperative evolution. Method: Prospective and controlled study in dermatologic surgery. Low and moderate risk patients were included according to the EMAPO score (Multicenter Perioperative Evaluation Study for Non-Cardiac Surgery). Divided into two groups: (G1) evaluation with the surgeon; (G2) evaluation with surgeon and cardiologist. Seven-day follow-up. Data on the procedure, evolution and adverse events were analyzed. Statistical evaluation: Shapiro-Wilk. Pearson's χ2 test and T or Mann-Whitney test (95% CI with P<0.05). Results: 299 patients evaluated (G1=200 and G2=99). All cleared for surgery, without any special guidance. Homogeneous groups, EMAPO (G1=2.6 ± 3.6 and G2=2.7 ± 3.2), except for dyslipidemia (G1=13.5% and G2=23.2% p=0.03). There were no cardiovascular events. Three patients in G2 and one in G1 had surgical wound infection. G2 patients underwent more tests (5.1 ± 1.7 vs 1.3 ± 1.7; p<0.01). The waiting time for the surgery was shorter in G1 (2.7 ± 2.1 months) compared to G2 (6.8 ± 4.6m) (p<0.01). Conclusion: There is no need for preoperative evaluation with a cardiologist and/or more tests in low or medium risk patients according to the EMAPO score for outpatient dermatological surgeries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jarrett PE. Day care surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl 2001; 23: 32–5.

Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, Barnason SA, Beckman JA, Bozkurt B, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(22):377-137. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.944. PMID: 25091544.

Lee A, Kerridge RK, Chui PT, Chiu CH, Gin T. Perioperative Systems as a quality model of perioperative medicine and surgical care. Health Policy. 2011;102(2-3):214–22. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.05.009.

Alboim C, Kliemann RB, Soares LE, Ferreira MM, Polanczyk CA, Biolo A. The impact of preoperative evaluation on perioperative events in patients undergoing cataract surgery: a cohort study. Eye (Lond). 2016;30(12):1614-22. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.203.

Schein OD, Katz J, Bass EB, Tielsch JM, Lubomski LH, Feldman MA, et al. The Value of Routine Preoperative Medical Testing Before Cataract Surgery. Study of Medical Testing for Cataract Surgery. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(3):168-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200001203420304.

Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, Calkins H, Chaikof E, Fleischmann KE, et al; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery); American Society of Echocardiography.; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; Heart Rhythm Society; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology; Society for Vascular Surgery. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery): developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Circulation. 2007;116(17):e418-99. Erratum in: Circulation. 2008;117(5):e154. Circulation. 2008;118(9): e143-4.

Gualandro DM, Yu PC, Caramelli B, Marques AC, Calderaro D, Luciana S. Fornari LS et al. 3ª Diretriz de Avaliação Cardiovascular Perioperatória da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017; 109(3Supl.1):1-104.

Johansson T, Fritsch G, Flamm M, Hansbauer B, Bachofner N, Mann E, et al. Effectiveness of non-cardiac preoperative testing in non-cardiac elective surgery: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110(6):926–39. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet071. PMID: 23578861.

Pinho C, Grandini PC, Gualandro DM, Calderaro D, Monachini M and Caramelli B. Multicenter study of perioperative evaluation for noncardiac surgeries in Brazil (EMAPO). Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2007;62(1):17-22. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322007000100004.

Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, Thomas EJ, Polanczyk CA, Cook EF, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation 1999;100(10):1043-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.10.1043.

Hofer J, Chung E, Sweitzer BJ. Preanesthesia evaluation for ambulatory surgery: do we make a difference? Curr Opin Anesthesiol 2013;26:669–76. doi:10.1097/ACO.0000000000000006.

Santos JS, Sankarankutty AK, Salgado Jr W, Kemp R, Leonel EP e Silva Jr OCS. Cirurgia ambulatorial: do conceito à organização de serviços e seus resultados. Medicina, Ribeirão Preto. 2008;41(3):274-86. https://www.revistas.usp.br/rmrp/article/view/273

Martinez MAR, Paixão M and Machado CAS. Surgery under local anesthetic: when the unexpected occurs. An Bras Dermatol. 2004;79(4):495-6.

Lira RPC, Nascimento MA, Temporini ER, Kara-José N e Arieta CEL. Suspensão de cirurgia de catarata e suas causas. Rev Saúde Pública. 2001;35(5):487-9.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535.doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535.

Pimentel ERA, Oliveira JP, Bloch LD e Niwa ABM. Risco de complicações durante a cirurgia dermatológica: protocolo das exéreses em fuso. Anais Bras Dermatol. 2005;80(5):493-8.

Araújo MEXS, Chou AC, da Silva CR, Oliveira LB e Neustein I. Facoemulsificação: resultados e complicações nos primeiros 100 olhos. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2000;63(1):29-31.

Loureiro BMC, Feitosa-Filho GS. Perioperative risk scores for non-cardiac surgery: descriptions and comparisons. Rev Soc Bras Clin Med. 2014;12(4):314-20.

Cohn SL and Fleisher LA (authors), Pellikka PA (section editors), Givens J and Saperia GM (Deputy Editors). Evaluation of cardiac risk prior to noncardiac surgery. UptoDate Nov.16/2020.

Eagle KA, Berger PB, Calkins H, Chaitman BR, Ewy GA, Fleischmann KE et al. ACC/AHA Guideline Update for Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery—Executive Summary. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). Circulation. 2002;105:1257–67.

Published

2023-07-27

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais/Originals Articles

How to Cite

Etcheverria, I. C. R. ., Moretti, M. A., Batista, C. H. R., Poltronieri , P. B., Ferreira , J. F. M., & Chagas, A. C. P. . (2023). Preoperative assessment in low complexity outpatient dermatologic surgery. Revista De Medicina, 102(4), e-204196. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1679-9836.v102i4e-204196