“Predação ontológica” e a conjuração de fixações liberais: ruminações sobre (inter)dependências e (des)possessões “selvagens”

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/2316901X.n90.2025.e10719

Palavras-chave:

Teoria da dependência, Perspectivismo, Fetichismo

Resumo

Este ensaio explora a (inter)dependência a partir dos conceitos de “significantes flutuantes” de Claude Lévi-Strauss e “predação ontológica” de Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, colocando-os em diálogo com outras teorias sociais, como a teoria da dependência de Fernando Henrique Cardoso e a noção de “Grande Fetiche” de Comte. O texto analisa como essas ideias ajudam a refletir sobre a mistificação do poder e a reprodução da desigualdade, além de questionar as implicações do progresso econômico, que molda as dependências globais e nacionais. O ensaio também desafia as noções liberais de liberdade e autodeterminação, propondo uma reavaliação da dependência e das crenças sobre autodeterminação.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Gustavo S. Azenha, Columbia University

    Diretor-executivo do Instituto de Estudos Latino-Americanos (ILAS) e professor do Department of Anthropology da Columbia University.

Referências

AZENHA, Gustavo S. A Political Ecology of Fetishism in Brazil’s ‘Discovery Coast’ Crisis, Socio-environmental Hybridization, and Historical Amnesia on the Frontiers of Global Liberalism. In: Global Power and Local Struggles in Developing Countries: Contemporary perspectives on: Europe and the People without History, by Eric R. Wolf@ 40. Paul Austin Stacey (Ed.). Brill, 2023.

CARDOSO, Fernando Henrique. The consumption of dependency theory in the United States. Latin American Research Review, 12.3, 7-24, 1977.

CASTRO, Viveiros de.Eduardo. The inconstancy of the Indian soul: The encounter of catholics and cannibals in 16th-century Brazil. Prickly Paradigm Press, 2011

CASTRO, Viveiros de. (2004). Exchanging perspectives: the transformation of objects into subjects in Amerindian ontologies. Common knowledge, 25(1-3), 21-42, 2019.

CASTRO, Viveiros de. Economic development and cosmopolitical re-involvement: from necessity to sufficiency. Contested ecologies, 28, 2013a.

CASTRO, Viveiros de. Closing remarks from the conclusion of the Contested Ecologies Writing Workshop, September 2011. Contested ecologies, 271, 2013b.

CASTRO, Viveiros de. Zeno and the Art of Anthropology. In The Relative Native: Essays on Indigenous Conceptual Worlds. Hau Books, 2015.

COMTE, Auguste. (1851). System of Positive Polity or Treatise on Sociology: Instituting the Religion of Humanity; Containing Social Dynamics, or the General Theory of Human Progress. Forgotten Books, 2018.

DIVANNA, Isabel. Reading Comte across the Atlantic: Intellectual exchanges between France and Brazil and the question of slavery. History of European Ideas 38.3, 452-466, 2012.

LACLAU, Ernesto. On Populist Reason. London/ Brooklyn, NY: Verso, 2005.

LACLAU, Ernesto. The death and resurrection of the theory of ideology. Journal of political ideologies, 1(3), 201-220, 1996

LATOUR, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, Claude (1950). Introduction to the Work of Marcel Mauss. Translated by Baker, Felicity. London: Routledge, 1987.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, Claude. (1955). Tristes Tropiques. Trans. John and Doreen Weightman. New York: Penguin Books, 1992.

MAUSS, Marcel. (1950). The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. W. W. Norton & Company, 2000.

MAUSS, Marcel. (1902). A General Theory of Magic. Routledge, 2005.

MERKEL, Ian. Terms of Exchange: Brazilian Intellectuals and the French Social Sciences. University of Chicago Press, 2022.

MORRIS, Rosalind C. Fetishism (Supposing That it Existed): A Preface to the Translation of Charles de Brosses’s Transgression. In The Returns of Fetishism: Charles de Brosses and the Afterlives of an Idea. Charles de Brosses, Morris, Rosalind C. and Daniel H. Leonard. University of Chicago Press, 2017a.

MORRIS, Rosalind C. After de Brosses: Fetishism, Translation, Comparativism, Critique. In The Returns of Fetishism: Charles de Brosses and the Afterlives of an Idea. Charles de Brosses, Morris, Rosalind C. and Daniel H. Leonard. University of Chicago Press, 2017b.

PALTI, Elías José. Positivism, revolution, and history in Brazil.The Worlds of Positivism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 53-80, 2018

PIETZ, William. The Problem of the Fetish, I. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 9(1): 5–17, 1985.

PIETZ, William. The problem of the fetish, II: The origin of the fetish. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 13(1): 23–45, 1987.

PIETZ, William. The problem of the fetish, IIIa: Bosman’s Guinea and the enlightenment theory of fetishism. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 16(1): 105–124, 1988.

TAUSSIG, Michael. Viscerality, faith, and skepticism: Another theory of magic. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6(3): 453–483, 2016.

ŽIŽEK, Slavoj. Against the populist temptation. Critical inquiry, 32(3), 551-574, 2006.

Downloads

Publicado

2025-05-07

Edição

Seção

Dossiê Teoria da dependência

Como Citar

Azenha, G. S. (2025). “Predação ontológica” e a conjuração de fixações liberais: ruminações sobre (inter)dependências e (des)possessões “selvagens”. Revista Do Instituto De Estudos Brasileiros, 1(90), e10719. https://doi.org/10.11606/2316901X.n90.2025.e10719