Prevention of intraoperative hypothermia: a descriptive-exploratory study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.7694.4729Keywords:
Perioperative Nursing; Hypothermia; Intraoperative Period; Body Temperature; Hospitals; Patient SafetyAbstract
Objective: to analyze the measures implemented in practice for the prevention of hypothermia during the intraoperative period in public and private hospitals. Method: quantitative, descriptive-exploratory study. The sample consisted of 201 nurses, invited via social media, Facebook, Instagram, and email. Data collection was performed using an online form created on the Survey Monkey® virtual platform. For analysis, descriptive statistics and association tests were applied to investigate the differences between the defined groups in relation to the study variables. Results: in both types of institutions, most participants were female and married/in a stable relationship. There was a significant difference between the types of hospitals in terms of operating room temperature control (p<0.001), patient body temperature monitoring (p=0.027), and use of active skin warming methods (p=0.009). Conclusion: the forced-air warming was the active method most frequently used, and nursing staff were the professional category most often indicated as responsible for implementing prewarming and using active methods in the types of institutions investigated. There is still a need to increase the daily implementation of measures to prevent hypothermia, pointing out to managers the need for investment and training of human resources.
Downloads
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
RLAE’s authorship concept is based on the substantial contribution by each of the individuals listed as authors, mainly in terms of conceiving and planning the research project, collecting or analyzing and interpreting data, writing and critical review. Indication of authors’ names under the article title is limited to six. If more, authors are listed on the online submission form under Acknowledgements. The possibility of including more than six authors will only be examined on multicenter studies, considering the explanations presented by the authors.Including names of authors whose contribution does not fit into the above criteria cannot be justified. Those names can be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Authors are fully responsible for the concepts disseminated in their manuscripts, which do not necessarily reflect the editors’ and editorial board’s opinion.