Assets of foreignness in aregulated industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-04-2022-0123Keywords:
Asset of foreignness (AoF), Liability of foreignness (LoF), Transaction cost, Governance, Firm performance, Government regulationAbstract
PurposeForeign subsidiaries incur substantial institutional conformity costs because they have to respond to host-country institutional pressures (Slangen & Hennart, 2008). The purpose of this paper is to study this type of cost from institutional and regulatory perspectives. The authors argue that these costs decrease when the host country adopts concepts of international regulations that multinationals may be familiar with due to their own home country regulation experience. This prior regulatory experience gives foreign subsidiaries an advantage of foreignness (AoF), which can offset their liability of foreignness (LoF).
Design/methodology/approachThis study compared the returns on assets of 35 domestic firms with those of foreign subsidiaries in the Brazilian energy industry between 2002 and 2021, using regression dynamic panel data.
FindingsThe existence of a relationship between the international regulatory norm and the Brazilian regulator has transformed the LoF into an advantage of foreignness to compete with local energy firms. The results also suggest that the better the regulatory quality of the subsidiary’s country of origin, the better its performance in Brazil, as it can reduce compliance costs. Finally, the greater the psychic distance between Brazil and the foreign subsidiary’s home country, the worse its performance.
Research limitations/implicationsThe research suggests that one of the keys to competitiveness in host countries is local regulatory ties. Prior international regulatory experience gives foreign subsidiaries an asset of foreignness (AoF). This result complements the current institutional and regulatory foreignness studies on emerging economies (Cuervo-Cazurra & Genc, 2008; Mallon et al., 2022) and the institutional asymmetry between home and host country (Mallon & Fainshmidt, 2017).
Practical implicationsThis research suggests that one of the keys to competitiveness in host countries is local regulatory ties. Prior international regulatory experience gives foreign subsidiaries an asset of foreignness (AoF). This result complements the current institutional and regulatory foreignness studies on emerging economies (Cuervo-Cazurra & Genc, 2008; Mallon et al., 2022) and the institutional asymmetry between home and host country (Mallon & Fainshmidt, 2017). The practical implication is that the relationship between conformity costs, capital budget calculation and strategic planning for internationalization will be related to the governance quality of the home country of multinationals. The social implication is that a country interested in attracting more direct foreign investment to areas that need foreign technology transfer and resources may consider adopting international regulatory standards.
Social implicationsThe social implication is that a country interested in attracting more direct foreign investment to areas that need foreign technology transfer and resources may consider adopting international regulatory standards.
Originality/valueThis research discuss firm and local regulator tie is one of core competitiveness in host countries (Yang and Meyer, 2020). This study also complements the current institutional and regulatory foreignness studies in emerging economy (Cuervo-Cazurra & Genc, 2008; Mallon et al., 2022). Second, prior regulatory experience of multinational enterprise in similar environment can affect its foreign affiliate performance (Perkins, 2014). Third, this study confirms current literature that argues that knowledge and ability to operate in an institutionalized country can be transferred from parent to affiliate. In the end, this study investigates whether AoF persists when host governments improve the governance of their industries.
Downloads
References
Adarkwah, G., & Malonaes, T. (2022). Firm–specific advantages: a comprehensive review with a focus on emerging markets. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39(2), 539–585. doi: 10.1007/s10490-020-09737-7.
Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica (ANEEL). (2008). Atlas de energia elétrica do brasil (3a edição). (accessed 2 February 2019).
Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica (ANEEL). (2019). ANEEL e regulador português assinam acordo de cooperação. Retrieved from http://www.aneel.gov.br/sala-de-imprensa//asset_publisher/zXQREz8EVlZ6/content/id/18678055 (accessed 2 February 2019).
Aguilera, R. V., & Yip, G. S. (2004). Corporate governance and globalization: toward an Actor-Centred institutional analysis. In A. Ariño, P. Ghemawat, J. Ricardt, Creating value through international strategy, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Barth, E., Gulbrandsen, T., & Schønea, P. (2005). Family ownership and productivity: the role of owner-management. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1-2), 107–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2004.02.001.
Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 257–273. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.006.
Bortoluzzo, A., Bortoluzzo, M., & Ferreira, M. M. S. (2023). Impact of the cash position on the performance of Brazilian companies during periods of economic recession. Revista De Administração Mackenzie, 24(3), eRAMF230039.
Brito, E. (2017). Tarifas de distribuição de energia elétrica no brasil: Aperfeiçoamentos da metodologia tarifária a partir de parâmetros de continuidade do serviço, sustentabilidade econômico-financeira e simplicidade regulatória. Tese de doutorado, Escola Politécnica., Universidade de São Paulo. https://doi.org/10.11606/T.3.2017.tde-18042017-135622 (accessed 20 April 2019).
Buckley, P., & Casson, M. (1976). The future of multinational enterprise, London: Macmillan.
Canal Energia. (2017). EDP manterá estratégia de hedge contra risco hidrológico em 2018. Retrieved from http://www2.ctee.com.br/energyexpoforum/2017/zpublisher/materia/?url=edp-mantera-estrategia-de-hedge-contra-risco-hidrologico-em-2018-20171109 (accessed 01 March 2019).
Carral, L. V., Bergmann, D. R., Silva, F. L., Peris, R. W., & Savoia, J. F. (2017). Impacto da medida provisória n° 579/2012 sobre o beta das empresas brasileiras do setor elétrico. REDECA - Revista Eletrônica Do Departamento De Ciências Contábeis & Departamento Atuária e Métodos Quantitativos Da FEA, 4(2), 1–14.
Caves, R. (1982). Multinational enterprises and economic analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Costellini, C., & Hollanda, L. (2014). Setor elétrico: Da MP 579 ao pacote financeiro. Informativo de Energia 001/2014. FGV Energia. Retrieved from https://fgvenergia.fgv.br/sites/fgvenergia.fgv.br/files/artigos/20140331_informativo_1_setor_eletrico_0.pdf (accessed 20 April 2020).
Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Genc, M. (2008). Transforming disadvantages into advantages: Developing countries MNEs in the least developed countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 957–979. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400390.
Cuypers, I., Ertug, G., & Hennart, J.-F. (2015). The effect of linguistic distance and bridge language proficiency on the stake taken by acquirers in cross-border acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(4), 429–442. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2014.71.
Daamen, B., Hennart, J. F., Kim, D. J., & Park, Y. R. (2007). Sources of and responses to the liability of foreignness: the case of korean companies in The Netherlands. Global Economic Review, 36(1), 17–35. doi: 10.1080/12265080701217165.
Dow, D., & Karunaratna, A. (2006). Developing a multidimensional instrument to measure psychic distance stimuli. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 578–602. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400221.
Dow, D., & Larimo, J. (2011). Disentangling the roles of international experience and distance in establishment mode choice. Management International Review, 51(3), 321–355. doi: 10.1007/s11575-011-0080-5.
Drogendijk, R., & Martin, O. (2015). Relevant dimensions and contextual weights of distance in international business decisions: Evidence from spanish and chinese outward FDI. International Business Review, 24(1), 133–147. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.07.003.
Dunning, J. H. (1980). Towards an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9–31. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490593.
EDP Energias do Brasil S.A. (2017). Contribuição à consulta pública MME n° 33/2017: Nota técnica 6 – destravamento das operações. Retrieved from https://enbr.infoinvest.com.br/ptb/informacoes-regulatorias-edp-brasil (accesed 28 January 2019).
EDP Energias do Brasil S.A. (2019). Release 4T2018 e 2018. Retrieved from http://ri.edp.com.br/ptb/8345/669344.pdf (accesed 28 January 2019).
Ferner, A., & Quintanilla, J. (1998). Multinationals, national business systems and HRM: the enduring influence of national identity or a process of 'anglo saxonization'. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(4), 710–731. doi: 10.1080/095851998340973.
Ferreira, C. K. L. (2000), A privatização do setor elétrico no Brasil. In A.C. Pinheiro, K. Fukasaky, (org), A privatização no Brasil: o caso dos serviços de utilidade pública (179-220), São Paulo: OCDE/BNDES.
Filatotchev, I., Toms, S., & Wright, M. (2006). The firm's strategic dynamics and corporate governance life-cycle. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 2(4), 256–279. doi: 10.1108/17439130610705481.
Gu, J., Cavanagh, K., Baer, R., & Strauss, C. (2017). An empirical examination of the factor structure of compassion. Plos One, 12(2) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172471.
Hennart, J.-F. (1982). A theory of multinational enterprise, Ann Arbor MI: University of MI Press.
Hennart, J. (1993). Explaining the swollen Middle: Why most transactions are a mix of ‘market’ and ‘’hierarchy. Organizational Science, 4(4).
Insch, G. S., & Miller, S. R. (2005). Perception of foreignness: Benefit or liability? Journal of Managerial Issues, 17(4), 423–438.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (1997). The internationalization process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitment. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490676.
Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The internationalization of the firm: Four swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies, 12(3), 305–323. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1975.tb00514.x.
Keasey, K., & Wright, M. (1993). Issues In corporate accountability and governance: an editorial. Accounting and Business Research, 23(sup1), 301–313. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1993.9729897.
Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy Under conditions of complexity: the case of the multinational enterprise. The Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81. doi: 10.2307/259037.
La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership Around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517. doi: 10.1111/0022-1082.00115.
Lee, J., Paik, Y., Horak, S., & Yang, I. (2022). Turning a liability into an asset of foreignness: Managing informal networks in korea. Business Horizons, 65(3), 351–364. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2021.04.002.
Lemmon, M. L., Roberts, M. R., & Zender, J. F. (2008). Back to the beginning: Persistence and the cross‐section of corporate capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1575–1608. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01369.x.
Lu, J., Ma, H., & Xie, X. (2022). Foreignness research in international business: Major streams and future directions. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(3), 449–480. doi: 10.1057/s41267-021-00465-8.
Mallon, M., & Fainshmidt, S. (2017). Asset of foreignness: a theoretical integration and agenda for future research. Journal of International Management, 23(1), 43–55. doi: 10.1016/j.intman.2016.08.001.
Mallon, M., Guldiken, O., Benischke, M., Dong, F., & Nguyen, T. (2022). Is there an advantage of emergingness? A politico-regulatory perspective. International Business Review, 31(2), 101940.
Mezias, J. (2002). Identifying liabilities of foreignness and strategies to minimize their effects: the case of labor lawsuit judgments in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 23(3), 229–244. doi: 10.1002/smj.220.
Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. (2002). Institutions and international business: a theoretical view. International Business Review, 11(6), 635–646. doi: 10.1016/S0969-5931(02)00042-2.
Nachum, L. (2009). When is foreignness an asset or a liability? Explaining the performance differential Between foreign and local firms. Journal of Management, 36(3), 714–739. doi: 10.1177/0149206309338522.
Peng, M. W. (2001). The resource-based view and international business. Journal of Management, 27(6), 803–829. doi: 10.1177/014920630102700611.
Peris, R. (2017). Análise do desempenho do setor elétrico no brasil - 2010 a 2015, São Paulo: Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo.
Perkins, S. (2014). When does prior experience pay? Institutional experience and the multinational corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(1), 145–181. doi: 10.1177/0001839214523603.
Petersen, B., & Pedersen, T. (2002). Coping with liability of foreignness: Different learning engagements of entrant firms. Journal of International Management, 8(3), 339–350. doi: 10.1016/S1075-4253(02)00068-6.
Pinto Junior, M., & Dutra, J. (2022). Concessões no setor elétrico brasileiro: evolução e perspectivas, 1. ed., Rio de Janeiro: Synergia.
Puhr, M., & Mullner, J. (2022). Foreign to all but fluent in many: the effect of multinationality on shock resilience. Journal of World Business, 57(6), 101370. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101370.
Regner, P., & Edman, J. (2014). MNE institutional advantage: How subunits shape, transpose and evade host country institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(3), 275–302. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2013.66.
Rezende, M., Miranda, G., & Pereira, J. (2014). A regulação tarifária e o impacto no retorno das ações das empresas do setor elétrico. XIV CONGRESSO DE CONTROLADORIA E CONTABILIDADE DA USP, 2014. São Paulo, 21 - 23 July 2014. https://congressousp.fipecafi.org/anais/artigos142014/202.pdf (accessed 20 April 2019).
Rosenzweig, P., & Singh, J. (1991). Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise. The Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 340–361. doi: 10.2307/258865.
Sales, J. (2009). Avaliação do processo de revisão tarifária periódica das concessionárias de distribuição de energia elétrica no brasil. Retrieved from http://repositorio.unicamp.br/bitstream/REPOSIP/264484/1/Sales_JulioCesarFerreira_M.pdf
Salomon, R., & Wu, Z. (2017). Institutional distance and local isomorphism strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4), 343–367. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2012.3.
Santos, J. D. A., Bortoluzzo, A. B., & Gonçalves, A. B. (2023). Management of corporate debt deadlines: a look at publicly traded companies in Brazil. Revista De Administração De Empresas, 63(6), e2022–0282. doi: 10.1590/s0034-759020230603.
Sertã Rezende, L. (2013). As teorias de internacionalização e os padrões de escolha dos mercados alvo: Estudo quantitativo sobre as empresas brasileiras na década 2002-2011. Tese de Mestrado, UFRJ - Instituto COPPEAD de Administração. Retrieved from https://www.coppead.ufrj.br/publicacao/as-teorias-de-internacionalizacao-e-os-padroes-de-escolha-dos-mercados-alvo-estudo-quantitativo-sobre-as-empresas-brasileiras-na-decada-2002-2011/ (accessed 20 April 2019).
Sethi, D., & Judge, W. (2009). Reappraising liabilities of foreignness Within an integrated perspective of the costs and benefits of doing business abroad. International Business Review, 18(4), 404–416. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.02.006.
Sethi, D., Guisinger, S. E., Ford, D., & Phelan, S. E. (2002). Seeking greener pastures: a theoretical and empirical investigation into the changing trend of foreign direct investment flows in response to institutional and strategic factors. International Business Review, 11(6), 685–705. doi: 10.1016/S0969-5931(02)00045-8.
Siegel, J., Pyun, L., & Cheon, B. (2019). Multinational firms, labor market discrimination, and the capture of outsider's advantage by exploiting the social divide. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(2), 370–397. doi: 10.1177/0001839218769634.
Szuster, N., Cardoso, R. L., Szuster, F., Szuster, F., & Szuster, F. (2013), Contabilidade Geral: Introdução a Contabilidade Societária. (4ª ed.) São Paulo: Atlas.
Taussig, M. (2017). Foreignness as both a global asset and a local liability: How host country idiosyncrasies and business activities matter. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(4), 498–522. doi: 10.1057/s41267-016-0032-1.
Tricker, R. I. (1984). Corporate governance, Williston VT: Gower.
Valor econômico (2018), Jirau prevê impacto financeiro de R$ 2,3 Bi de GSF deste ano. Reportagem of Rodrigo Polito. Published in 09/08/2023, Retrieve from https://valor.globo.com/empresas/noticia/2018/08/09/jirau-preve-impacto-financeiro-de-r-23-bilhoes-de-gsf-este-ano.ghtml
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (1997). World investment report 1997. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/en/Docs/wir1997_en.pdf (accessed 5 March 2019).
Verlegh, P. W., & Steenkamp, J. E. (2008). A review and meta analysis of country-of-Origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(5), 521–546. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4870(99)00023-9.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
World Bank. (2019). Worldwide governance indicators. Retrieved from https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/Home/Documents (accessed 1 February 2019).
Wu, Z., & Salomon, R. (2017). Deconstructing the liability of foreignness: Regulatory enforcement actions Against foreign banks. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(7), 837–861. doi: 10.1057/s41267-017-0092-x.
Yang, W., & Meyer, K. E. (2020). How do local and foreign firms compete? Competitive actions in an emerging economy. International Business Review, 29(3), 101689. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101689.
Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–363. doi: 10.2307/256683.
Zaheer, S., & Mosakowski, E. (1997). The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: a global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal, 18(6), 439–464. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199706)18:6<439::AID-SMJ884>3.0.CO;2-Y.
Zahra, S. A., & Filatotchev, I. (2004). Governance of the entrepreneurial threshold firm: a Knowledge-Based perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 885–898. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00458.x.
Further reading
Engie Brasil Energia S.A. (2018). Apresentação de resultados 2T18. Retrieved from https://www.engie.com.br/uploads/2018/10/APSEBE2T18.pdf (accessed 20 April 2019).
Santos, T. B., Arantes, A. D., Vieira, J. O., Cunha, M. F., & Pimenta, D. P. (2018). Setor elétrico e risco regulatório: Uma avaliação sob a perspectiva do impacto da MP n° 579/2012 e portaria n° 120/2016 - MME. São Paulo: XVIII USP International Conference in Accounting: Moving accounting forward. São Paulo, 25 – 27 July 2018. https://congressousp.fipecafi.org/anais/18UspInternational/ArtigosDownload/676.pdf (accessed 20 April 2019).
Slangen, A., & Hennart, J.-F. (2008). Do foreign greenfield outperform foreign acquisitions or vice versa? An institutional perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(7), 1301–1328. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00794.x.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Leonardo Nery Dos Santos, Hsia Hua Sheng, Adriana Bruscato Bortoluzzo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Management Department of the School of Economics, Management and Accounting of the University of São Paulo.
The publication of article segments is allowed, subject to prior authorization and source identification.
Copyright is regulated under Licença Creative Commons Attribution
