Editorial: Methodological approaches to addressing grand challenges in management research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/rausp-10-2024-281Downloads
References
Bansal, P., & Sharma, G. (2022). Three different approaches to impact: Translating, cocreating, and performing. Business & Society, 61(4), 827–832. 10.1177/00076503211015926.
Dumont, G. (2023). Immersion in organizational ethnography: Four methodological requirements to immerse oneself in the field. Organizational Research Methods, 26(3), 441–458. 10.1177/10944281221075365.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Jeyaraj, A., Hughes, L., Davies, G. H., Ahuja, M., Albashrawi, M. A., … Walton, P. (2024). “Real impact”: challenges and opportunities in bridging the gap between research and practice–making a difference in industry, policy, and society. International Journal of Information Management, 78. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102750.
Eisenhardt, K. M., Graebner, M. E., & Sonenshein, S. (2016). Grand challenges and inductive methods: Rigor without rigor mortis. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1113–1123. 10.5465/amj.2016.4004.
Ferraro, F., Etzion, D., & Gehman, J. (2015). Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: Robust action revisited. Organization Studies, 36(3), 363–390. 10.1177/0170840614563742.
George, G., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A., & Tihanyi, L. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1880–1895. 10.5465/amj.2016.4007.
Hamann, R., Nilsson, W., Drimie, S., & Freeth, R. (2024). EXPRESS: Researchers convening dialogue to address grand challenges: Affordances, tensions, and the shift to deep dialogue. Strategic Organization, 14761270241279132. 10.1177/14761270241279132.
Heron, J., & Reason, P. (2008). Extending epistemology within a co-operative inquiry, in Reason, P., Bradbury, H. (Eds), The sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice, Vol. 2, pp. 366–380.
Langley, A. (2021). What is “this” a case of? Generative theorizing for disruptive times. Journal of Management Inquiry, 30(3), 251–258. 10.1177/10564926211016545.
Muñoz, P., & Dimov, D. (2023). A translational framework for entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 19, e00361. 10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00361.
Schiele, H., Krummaker, S., Hoffmann, P., & Kowalski, R. (2022). The “research world café” as method of scientific enquiry: Combining rigor with relevance and speed. Journal of Business Research, 140, 280–296. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.075.
Simsek, Z., Bansal, P., Shaw, J. D., Heugens, P., & Smith, W. K. (2018). From the editors—seeing practice impact in new ways. Academy of Management Journal, 61(6), 2021–2025. 10.5465/amj.2018.4006.
Wickert, C., Post, C., Doh, J. P., Prescott, J. E., & Prencipe, A. (2021). Management research that makes a difference: Broadening the meaning of impact. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2), 297–320. 10.1111/joms.12666.
Williams, A., Parker, J. N., Kennedy, S., & Whiteman, G. (2024). A process study of evolving paradoxes and Cross-Sector goals: a partnership to accelerate global sustainability. Journal of Management, 1492063241278803 10.1177/01492063241278803.
Woolf, S. H. (2008). The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA, 299(2), 211–213. 10.1001/jama.2007.26.
Zandee, D. P., & Coghlan, D. (2024). Action research for impact in addressing the grand challenges. Strategic Organization, 14761270241270913 10.1177/14761270241270913.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Simone R. Barakat, José Guilherme Ferraz de Campos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Management Department of the School of Economics, Management and Accounting of the University of São Paulo.
The publication of article segments is allowed, subject to prior authorization and source identification.
Copyright is regulated under Licença Creative Commons Attribution