Exploring off-chain voting and blockchain in decentralized autonomous organizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/rausp-08-2023-0162Keywords:
Decentralized autonomous organizations, Blockchain, Voting, Off-chain, Decision-making, GovernanceAbstract
PurposeThe current scenario shows increased adoption of off-chain voting applications in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) to avoid complexity and costs for user engagement in their governance. This paper aims to comprehend the trends and patterns within the DAO community with off-chain voting systems and blockchain usage.
Design/methodology/approachThis exploratory study uses a two-pronged quantitative approach, combining descriptive statistical analysis and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Input data from different DAO proposals and votes were analyzed.
FindingsResults indicate that the 179 DAOs analyzed account for 26,538 proposals and 1,268,474 followers of the entire Snapshot base in January 2023, showing high concentration in engagement. The preferred social media communication channels are Twitter and GitHub, showing a decrease of Ethereum as a main chain, with Polygon and Binance Smart Chain already accounting for 22%. Basic voting can lead to greater user involvement in the voting process.
Research limitations/implicationsThis study complements the traditional governance theory perspective and advances in the emerging literature on DAOs and blockchain with an empirical analysis.
Practical implicationsAs blockchain technology gains increasing adoption, comprehending trends and patterns within the DAO community becomes pivotal in identifying opportunities and challenges for innovation and improvement.
Social implicationsFindings can facilitate the development of improved governance models and decision-making processes for DAOs, leading to a more robust and sustainable ecosystem.
Originality/valueThis study presents a broader IT-based governance foresight via blockchain while providing an understanding of the voting process, technology features and governance mechanisms for social community engagement and decision-making in DAOs.
Downloads
References
Azzi, R., Chamoun, R. K., & Sokhn, M. (2020). The rise of decentralized autonomous organizations: The future of work. Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference, 10.1007/978-3-030-63089-6_17.
Balc, L. B., Ilies, R., Cioban, B., & Cuza, B. (2013). Corporate governance: Conceptual approaches. Managerial Challenges of the Contemporary Society, (5), 14–17.
Bebchuk, L. A., Cohen, A., & Hirst, S. (2017). The agency problems of institutional investors. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(3), 89–112, 10.1257/jep.31.3.89.
Beck, R., Müller-Bloch, C., & King, J. L. (2018). Governance in the blockchain economy: A framework and research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(10), 1. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol19/iss10/1 doi: 10.17705/1jais.00518.
Bellavitis, C., Fisch, C., & Momtaz, P. P. (2023). The rise of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs): A first empirical glimpse. Venture Capital, 25(2), 187–203, 10.1080/13691066. 2022. 21167 97.
Böhme, R., Christin, N., Edelman, B., & Moore, T. (2015). Bitcoin: Economics, technology, and governance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(2), 213–238, 10.1257/jep.29.2.213.
Böhme, R., Christin, N., Edelman, B., & Moore, T. (2022). DAOs, blockchain oracles, and decentralized governance. Journal of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Research.
Chen, L., Tong, T. W., Tang, S., & Han, N. (2022). Governance and design of digital platforms: A review and future research directions on a Meta-Organization. Journal of Management, 48(1), 147–184. 10.1177/01492063211045023.
Chohan, U. W. (2017). The decentralized autonomous organization and governance issues. SSRN, 10.2139/ssrn.3082055
Crombie, N. (2008). Corporate governance and accountability. Pacific Accounting Review, 20(1), 77–79. 10.1108/01140580810872870.
DeepDAO. (2023). Retrieved from https://deepdao.io/organizations
Geschickter, C. (2022). How decentralized autonomous organizations will impact digital transformation. Gartner. Retrieved from www.gartner.com/document/4011135?ref=authbottomrec&refval=4022608
Glaveski, S. (2022). How DAOs could change the way we work. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2022/04/how-daos-could-change-the-way-we-work
Gol, E. S., Avital, M., & Stein, M.-K. (2019). Crowdwork platforms: Juxtaposing centralized and decentralized governance. Association for Information Systems. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2019_rp/110
Goldberg, M., & Schär, F. (2023). Metaverse governance: An empirical analysis of voting within decentralized autonomous organizations. Journal of Business Research, 160, 113764. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113764.
Grilo, A., & Rosado, L. (2019). Blockchain-Based E-Voting System with Decentralized Identifiers and Verifiable Credentials., Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, 10.1145/3339252.3339278
Hale, B. (2020). Introducing space: A decentralized file storage platform powered by IPFS and Filecoin. Retrieved from https://blockchain-today.medium.com/decentralizing-file-storage-with-ipfs-filecoin-and-sia-b7df572ca809
Hanisch, M., Goldsby, C. M., Fabian, N. E., & Oemichen, J. (2023). Digital governance: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 162, 1137777. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113777.
Harsono, H. (2023). The utilization of web3 native resources to create a centralized base of authoritarian power. Journal of International Affairs, 153–168.
Hassan, S., & De Filippi, P. (2021). Decentralized autonomous organization. Internet Policy Review, 10(2), 1–10. 10.14763/2021.2.1556.
Hawlitschek, F., Notheisen, B., & Teubner, T. (2018). The limits of trust-free systems: A literature review on blockchain technology and trust in the sharing economy. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 29, 50–63. 10.1016/j.elerap.2018.03.005.
Heap, S. P. H., Tsutsui, K., & Zizzo, D. J. (2020). Vote and voice: an experiment on the effects of inclusive governance rules, Springer.
Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2007). Transparency and corporate governance. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.958628.
Hsieh, Y.-Y., Vergne, J.-P., Anderson, P., Lakhani, K., & Reitzig, M. (2018). Bitcoin and the rise of decentralized autonomous organizations. Journal of Organization Design, 7(1), 1–16, 10.1186/s41469-018-0038-1.
Lafioune, N., & St-Jacques, M. (2020). Towards the creation of a searchable 3D smart city model. Innovation & Management Review, 17(3), 285–305. 10.1108/INMR-03-2019-0033.
Larimer, D. (2013). Transactions as proof-of-Stake. Retrieved from https://cryptochainuni.com/wp-content/uploads/Invictus-Innovations-Transactions-As-Proof-Of-Stake.pdf
Li, Y., & Liang, Y. (2021). Exploring the governance of decentralized autonomous organizations: A systematic review of literature. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101105.
Liu, C., Guo, H., Xu, M., Wang, S., Yu, D., Yu, J., & Cheng, X. (2022). Extending on-chain trust to off-chain – trustworthy blockchain data collection using trusted execution environment (TEE). IEEE Transactions on Computers, 1–1. 10.1109/tc.2022.3148379.
Mateus, S., & Sarkar, S. (2023). Can decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) revolutionize healthcare? California Management Review. Retrieved from https://cmr.berkeley.edu/2023/01/can-decentralized-autonomous-organizations-daos-revolutionize-healthcare/
Mini, T., Ellinger, E. W., Gregory, R. W., & Widjaja, T. (2021). An exploration of governing via IT in decentralized autonomous organizations. Association for Information Systems. Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1024&context=icis2021
Misangyi, V. F., & Acharya, A. G. (2014). Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1681–1705. 10.5465/amj.2012.0728.
Mohd Noor, N., Rasli, A., Abdul Rashid, M. A., Mubarak, M. F., & Abas, I. H. (2022). Ranking of corporate governance dimensions: A Delphi study. Administrative Sciences, (2076-3387), 12(4), 173. 10.3390/admsci12040173.
Murray, A., Kuban, S., Josefy, M., & Anderson, J. O. N. (2021). Contracting in the smart era: The implications of blockchain and decentralized autonomous organizations for contracting and corporate governance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(4), 622–641. 10.5465/amp.2018.0066.
Park, H., Ureta, I., & Kim, B. (2023). Trend analysis of decentralized autonomous organization using big data analytics. Information, 14(6), 326. 10.3390/info14060326.
Purwaningsih, E., Muslikh, M., Suhaeri, S., & Basrowi, B. (2024). Utilizing blockchain technology in enhancing supply chain efficiency and export performance, and its implications on the financial performance of SMEs. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 449–460. 10.5267/j.uscm.2023.9.007.
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Set relations in social research, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ramos, C. R. S., & Queiroz, M. M. (2022). Blockchain in education: The influence of trust on adoption and implementation. RAUSP Management Journal, 57(3), 316–331. 10.1108/RAUSP-06-2021-0097.
Rikken, O., Janssen, M., Kwee, Z., Bolívar, R., & Scholl, H. J. (2019). Governance challenges of blockchain and decentralized autonomous organizations. Information Polity, 24(4), 397–417. 10.3233/IP-190154.
Santana, C., & Albareda, L. (2022). Blockchain and the emergence of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs): An integrative model and research agenda, Amsterdan: Elsevier.
Saurabh, K., Rani, N., & Upadhyay, P. (2023). Towards blockchain led decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) business model innovations. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(2), 475–502. 10.1108/BIJ-10-2021-0606.
Schreyögg, G., & Sydow, J. (2010). Crossroads – organizing for fluidity? Dilemmas of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 21(6), 1251–1262, doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0561.
Schröder, M., Brangewitz, S., & Platenius, M. C. (2020). Decentralized autonomous organization governance: Blockchain-based solutions for cooperative decision-making. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI2020).
Siew Yee, C., Sharoja Sapiei, N., & Abdullah, M. (2018). Tax avoidance, corporate governance and firm value in the digital era. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 19(2), 160–175. 10.18196/jai.190299.
Snapshot. (2023). Snapshot: Decentralized governance. Retrieved from https://snapshot.org/
Virovets, D., & Obushnyi, S. (2020). Decentralized autonomous organizations as the new form of economic cooperation in digital world. The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration, 20(2), 42–52.
Wang, Z., Liu, J., Wu, Q., Zhang, Y., Yu, H., & Zhou, Z. (2019). An analytic evaluation for the impact of uncle blocks by selfish and stubborn mining in an imperfect Ethereum network. Computers & Security, 87, 101581. doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2019.101581.
Wu, Y., Yang, Z., Xia, H., & Rong, C. (2021). A survey on Decentralized Autonomous Organizations: From Blockchain to Distributed Ledgers. ACM Computing Surveys
Yang, M. (2022). Financial innovation regulations and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese listed firms article. ]Australian Economic Papers, 61(1), 24–41. 10.1111/1467-8454.12231.
Ying-Ying, H., & Wadhwa, A. (2021). Diffusion of institutional technologies: The case of blockchain. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2021(1), 1–1. 10.5465/AMBPP.2021.15388abstract.
Zamyatin, A., Harz, D., Lind, J., Panayiotou, P., Gervais, A., & Knottenbelt, W. J. (2019). Trustless, interoperable Cryptocurrency-Backed assets. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.
Zattoni, A., Dedoulis, E., Leventis, S., & Van Ees, H. (2020). Corporate governance and institutions – A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 28(6), 465–487, 10.1111/corg.12347.
Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., & Föhr, L. (2019). The ICO gold rush: It's a scam, it's a bubble, it's a super challenge for regulators. Harvard International Law Journal, 60(2), 267–315.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Thiago Dias Monteiro, Otavio Próspero Sanchez, Gustavo Hermínio Salati Marcondes de Moraes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Management Department of the School of Economics, Management and Accounting of the University of São Paulo.
The publication of article segments is allowed, subject to prior authorization and source identification.
Copyright is regulated under Licença Creative Commons Attribution