Market concentration and implicit taxes: analyzing Brazilian firms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/rausp-04-2023-005Keywords:
Market concentration, Implicit tax, Explicit tax, Corporate strategyAbstract
PurposeThis study aims to explore the interplay between market concentration and implicit tax burdens in Brazil, offering a fresh perspective on the conventional belief of perfect competition.
Design/methodology/approachData was sourced from Brazilian firms on the B3 stock exchange between 2011 and 2021. Multiple linear regression techniques were employed to analyze the relation of explicit tax rates to firms’ pre- and post-tax returns.
FindingsDominant firms in the market tend to bear a lower implicit tax burden and have the capacity to extend tax incentive benefits to shareholders.
Research limitations/implicationsThe findings highlight Brazil’s intricate corporate tax fabric, particularly regarding implicit taxes. They provide a foundation for deeper inquiries into how market dominance, taxation policies, and corporate strategies converge.
Practical implicationsRegulators and business leaders can harness this knowledge to recalibrate tax strategies and market regulations. Specifically, a closer examination of the dynamics that permit reduced implicit tax implications in monopolized markets is essential for equity.
Social implicationsCompanies with pronounced market concentration can mitigate their implicit tax burdens, potentially offloading them to consumers and suppliers. This points to potential inequities in current tax structures.
Originality/valueThis research unveils nuanced insights into Brazil’s multifaceted interrelations between corporate influence, taxation strategies, and market forces.
Downloads
References
Armstrong, C. S., Blouin, J. L., & Larcker, D. F. (2012). The incentives for tax planning. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1/2), 391–411. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.04.001.
Berger, P. G. (1993). Explicit and implicit tax effects of the R & D tax credit. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(2), 131–171. doi: 10.2307/2491268.
Callihan, D. S., & White, R. A. (1999). An application of the Scholes and Wolfson model to examine the relation between implicit and explicit taxes and firm market structure. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 21(1), 1–19. doi: 10.2308/jata.1999.21.1.1.
Chyz, J. A., Luna, L., & Smith, H. (2021). Implicit taxes of US domestic and multinational firms over the past quarter-century. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 43(2), 37–61.
Cordes, J. (1989). Tax incentives and R&D spending: A review of the evidence. Research Policy, 18(3), 119–133. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(89)90001-2.
Delgado, F. J., Fernández-Rodríguez, E., & Martínez-Arias, A. (2014). Effective tax rates in corporate taxation: A quantile regression for the EU. Engineering Economics, 25(5), 487–496. doi: 10.5755/j01.ee.25.5.4531.
Erickson, M. M., & Maydew, E. L. (1998). Implicit taxes in high dividend yield stocks. Accounting Review: A Quarterly Journal of the American Accounting Association, 73, 435–458.
Favero, L. P., Belfiore, P., Takamatsu, R. T., & Suzart, J. (2014). Quantitative methods with stata: Procedures, routines, and analysis of results, Vol. 1, Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
Gordon, R., & MacKie-Mason, J. (1990). Effects of the tax reform act of 1986 on corporate financial policy and organizational form. Organizations & Markets eJournal, doi: https://doi.org/10.3386/W3222.
Guenther, D. A. (1994). The relation between tax rates and pre-tax returns: Direct evidence from the 1981 and 1986 tax rate reductions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18(3), 379–393. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(94)90027-2.
Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 127–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.002.
Hemphill, T. A. (2009). The US research & experimentation tax credit: The case for an effective R&D investment policy incentive. Innovation, 11(3), 341–356. doi: 10.5172/impp.11.3.341.
Jennings, R., Weaver, C. D., & Mayew, W. J. (2012). The extent of implicit taxes at the corporate level and the effect of TRA86. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(4), 1021–1059. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2012.01157.x.
Markle, K. S., Mills, L. F., & Williams, B. (2020). Implicit corporate taxes and income shifting. The Accounting Review, 95(3), 315–342. doi: 10.2308/accr-52526.
Mason, E. S. (1939). Price and production policies of large-scale enterprise. The American Economic Review, 29 (1), 61–74.
Salbador, D. A., & Vendrzyk, V. P. (2006). An examination of the relations among tax preferences, implicit taxes, and market power in a noncompetitive market. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 28(2), 47–67. doi: 10.2308/jata.2006.28.2.47.
Scholes, M. S., & Wolfson, M. A. (1992). Taxes and business strategy: A Planning Approach, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Scholes, M. S., Wolfson, M. A., Erickson, M., Maydew, E. L., & Shevlin, T. (2009). Taxes and business strategy: A Planning Approach, 4th ed., NJ: Prentice Hall.
Shackelford, D. A., & Shevlin, T. (2001). Empirical tax research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1/3), 321–387. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00022-2.
Smith, H. (2021). Implicit taxes in imperfect markets”. In: Hasseldine, J. (Ed.), Advances in taxation (advances in taxation, 29 1–24. Leeds, UK: Emerald Publishing.
Smith, H. E. (2017). Implicit taxes in imperfect markets. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville (TN), United States.
Zhang, X. L. (2016). Research on effect of implicit taxes on china’s listed
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Antonio Lopo Martinez, Raimundo da Silva, Alfredo Sarlo Neto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Management Department of the School of Economics, Management and Accounting of the University of São Paulo.
The publication of article segments is allowed, subject to prior authorization and source identification.
Copyright is regulated under Licença Creative Commons Attribution
