Research ethics in management studies: reflections and strategies for early-stage scholars
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-12-2025-283Downloads
References
Bell, E., & Bryman, A. (2007). The ethics of management research: an exploratory content analysis. British Journal of Management, 18(1), 63-77. DOI: doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00487.x
Cilliers, L., & Viljoen, K. (2021). A framework of ethical issues to consider when conducting internet-based research. South African Journal of Information Management, 23(1), 1-9. DOI: doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v23i1.1215
Elbanna, S., & Child, J. (2023). From “publish or perish” to “publish for purpose.” European Management Review, 20(4), 614-618. DOI: doi.org/10.1111/emre.12618
Fujii, L. A. (2012). Research ethics 101: dilemmas and responsibilities. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45(4), 717-723. DOI: doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512000819
Greenwood, M. (2016). Approving or improving research ethics in management journals. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(3), 507-520. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2564-x
Hourneaux, F., Hamza, K. M., & Cordeiro, R. A. (2024). The “publish and perish” phenomenon: how journals can be affected by it and survive. RAUSP Management Journal, 59(3), 206-211. DOI: doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-07-2024-280
Islam, G., & Greenwood, M. (2023). Ethical research in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 182(1), 1-5. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05301-z
Jeanes, E. (2017). Are we ethical? Approaches to ethics in management and organisation research. Organization,24(2), 174-197. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/13505084166569
Kirklies, P. C., Neumann, O., & Hohensinn, L. (2024). Promoting digital equality in co-production: the role of platform design. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101903. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101903
Limongi, R., & Rogers, P. (2025a). Open science in three acts: foundations, practice, and implementation – First act. Brazilian Administration Review, 22(1), e250079. DOI: doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2025250079
Limongi, R., & Rogers, P. (2025b). Open science in three acts: foundations, practice, and implementation – Second act. Brazilian Administration Review, 22(2), e250116. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2025250116
Logg, J. M., & Dorison, C. A. (2021). Pre-registration: weighing costs and benefits for researchers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 167, 18-27. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.05.006
Matos, E. J., Bertoncini, A. L. C., Ames, M. C. F. D. C., & Serafim, M. C. (2024).The (lack of) ethics at generative AI in business management education and research. Mackenzie Management Review,25(6), eRAMD240061. DOI: doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMD240061
McGregor, S. L. (2023). Ethical considerations in research about organizations: compendium of strategies. Ethics in Progress, 14(2), 4-23. DOI: doi.org/10.14746/eip.2023.2.1
Office for Human Research Protections (2025). The Belmont Report – Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Available at https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html
Ramos, G., Vieites, Y., Jacob, J., & Andrade, E. B. (2020). Political orientation and support for social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 54(4), 697-713. DOI: doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220200162x
Resnik, D. B. (December 23, 2024). What is ethics in research & why is it important? National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Available at https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis
Rogers, P., & Limongi, R. (2025). Open science in three acts: foundations, practice, and implementation – Third act. Brazilian Administration Review, 22(3), e250162. DOI: doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2025250162
Scheytt, C., & Pflüger, J. (2024). Conducting qualitative research in organizations ethically: organizationality as a heuristic to identify ethical challenges. International Journal of Qualitative Methods,23, 1-13. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/16094069241237
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357. DOI: doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Wallace, M., & Sheldon, N. (2015). Business research ethics: participant observer perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 267-277. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2102-2
Zyphur, M. J., & Pierides, D. C. (2017). Is quantitative research ethical? Tools for ethically practicing, evaluating, and using quantitative research. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 1-16. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3549-8
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rafaela Almeida Cordeiro, Pâmela Ingrid Simioni Costa, Caroline Aparicio Dutra Pereira

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Management Department of the School of Economics, Management and Accounting of the University of São Paulo.
The publication of article segments is allowed, subject to prior authorization and source identification.
Copyright is regulated under Licença Creative Commons Attribution