Research ethics in management studies: reflections and strategies for early-stage scholars

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-12-2025-283

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bell, E., & Bryman, A. (2007). The ethics of management research: an exploratory content analysis. British Journal of Management, 18(1), 63-77. DOI: doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00487.x

Cilliers, L., & Viljoen, K. (2021). A framework of ethical issues to consider when conducting internet-based research. South African Journal of Information Management, 23(1), 1-9. DOI: doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v23i1.1215

Elbanna, S., & Child, J. (2023). From “publish or perish” to “publish for purpose.” European Management Review, 20(4), 614-618. DOI: doi.org/10.1111/emre.12618

Fujii, L. A. (2012). Research ethics 101: dilemmas and responsibilities. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45(4), 717-723. DOI: doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512000819

Greenwood, M. (2016). Approving or improving research ethics in management journals. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(3), 507-520. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2564-x

Hourneaux, F., Hamza, K. M., & Cordeiro, R. A. (2024). The “publish and perish” phenomenon: how journals can be affected by it and survive. RAUSP Management Journal, 59(3), 206-211. DOI: doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-07-2024-280

Islam, G., & Greenwood, M. (2023). Ethical research in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 182(1), 1-5. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05301-z

Jeanes, E. (2017). Are we ethical? Approaches to ethics in management and organisation research. Organization,24(2), 174-197. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/13505084166569

Kirklies, P. C., Neumann, O., & Hohensinn, L. (2024). Promoting digital equality in co-production: the role of platform design. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101903. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101903

Limongi, R., & Rogers, P. (2025a). Open science in three acts: foundations, practice, and implementation – First act. Brazilian Administration Review, 22(1), e250079. DOI: doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2025250079

Limongi, R., & Rogers, P. (2025b). Open science in three acts: foundations, practice, and implementation – Second act. Brazilian Administration Review, 22(2), e250116. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2025250116

Logg, J. M., & Dorison, C. A. (2021). Pre-registration: weighing costs and benefits for researchers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 167, 18-27. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.05.006

Matos, E. J., Bertoncini, A. L. C., Ames, M. C. F. D. C., & Serafim, M. C. (2024).The (lack of) ethics at generative AI in business management education and research. Mackenzie Management Review,25(6), eRAMD240061. DOI: doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMD240061

McGregor, S. L. (2023). Ethical considerations in research about organizations: compendium of strategies. Ethics in Progress, 14(2), 4-23. DOI: doi.org/10.14746/eip.2023.2.1

Office for Human Research Protections (2025). The Belmont Report – Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Available at https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html

Ramos, G., Vieites, Y., Jacob, J., & Andrade, E. B. (2020). Political orientation and support for social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 54(4), 697-713. DOI: doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220200162x

Resnik, D. B. (December 23, 2024). What is ethics in research & why is it important? National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Available at https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis

Rogers, P., & Limongi, R. (2025). Open science in three acts: foundations, practice, and implementation – Third act. Brazilian Administration Review, 22(3), e250162. DOI: doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2025250162

Scheytt, C., & Pflüger, J. (2024). Conducting qualitative research in organizations ethically: organizationality as a heuristic to identify ethical challenges. International Journal of Qualitative Methods,23, 1-13. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/16094069241237

Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357. DOI: doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

Wallace, M., & Sheldon, N. (2015). Business research ethics: participant observer perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 267-277. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2102-2

Zyphur, M. J., & Pierides, D. C. (2017). Is quantitative research ethical? Tools for ethically practicing, evaluating, and using quantitative research. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 1-16. DOI: doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3549-8

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

Issue

Section

Editorial