Exploring MOOC adoption among aspiring managers – a mediation analysis using the technology readiness and acceptance model (TRAM)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-10-2025-0221Palabras clave:
Technology readiness, Technology acceptance model, Learning goal orientation, Behavioral intention, Task performance, MOOC, Parallel and serial mediation, IndiaResumen
PurposeMassive open online courses (MOOCs) have emerged as innovative tools for aspiring managers, offering flexible learning opportunities for skill enhancement. This study aims to integrate learning goal orientation (LGO) with the technology readiness (TR) and acceptance model to explore MOOC adoption intentions and self-reported task performance.
Design/methodology/approachData from 410 postgraduate management students from India were analyzed using partial least squares–structural equation modeling to assess direct relationships and mediation effects.
FindingsFindings reveal that TR traits – specifically innovativeness and optimism – enhance perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PU), whereas insecurity and discomfort hinder them. LGO positively influences PEOU and task performance. Mediation analysis shows that PEOU and PU play significant parallel and serial mediating roles between LGO and adoption intentions, with the model explaining 54.4% of the variance in behavioral intention.
Practical implicationsThese findings offer actionable insights for MOOC providers: promoting ease of use and usefulness and addressing learner anxieties can enhance adoption and learning outcomes. Examining individual and technological factors that influence adoption and task performance, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of how learners engage with MOOCs and how providers can enhance MOOC effectiveness to improve user retention and impact.
Originality/valueThe findings contribute to the MOOC adoption literature by demonstrating how individual traits and technology characteristics influence adoption intention and self-reported task performance. Notably the study examines the parallel and serial mediation influences in addition to the direct effects.
Descargas
Referencias
Akter, H., and Ahmed, W. (2025). Reevaluating the UTAUT framework in workforce MOOC adoption, Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 37 No. 7-8, pp. 437-454.
Chatzoglou, P.D., Sarigiannidis, L., Vraimaki, E. and Diamantidis, A. (2009). Investigating Greek employees' intention to use web‐based training, Computers & Education, Vol. 53 No. 3, pp. 877‐89.
Cheng, Y. M. (2015). Towards an understanding of the factors affecting m-learning acceptance: Roles of technological characteristics and compatibility, Asia Pacific Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 109-119.
Cheng, Y. M. (2024). Nurses’ MOOCs continuance intention and task performance: Antecedents and mediators, Information Discovery and Delivery, Vol. 52 No. 3, pp. 324-339.
Chin, W. W., Thatcher, J. B., Wright, R. T., and Steel, D. (2013). Controlling for common method variance in PLS analysis: The measured latent marker variable approach. In New Perspectives in Partial Least Squares and Related Methods. New York: Springer, pp. 231-239.
Chiu, W. and Cho, H. (2021). The role of technology readiness in individuals' intention to use health and fitness applications: A comparison between users and non-users, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 807-825.
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., and Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 982–1003.
GMI (2025). Massive Open Online Courses Market, available at https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/massive-open-online-courses-market (accessed May 20, 2025).
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 39-50.
Goodhue, D.L. and Thompson, R.L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 213-236.
Gupta, K. P. (2020). Investigating the adoption of MOOCs in a developing country: Application of technology-user-environment framework and self-determination theory, Interactive Technology and Smart Education, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 355-375.
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., and Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
Harnadi, B., Widiantoro, A. D., and Prasetya, F. H. (2024). Investigating the behavioral differences in the acceptance of MOOCs and E-learning technology, Computers in Human Behavior Reports, Vol. 14, 100403.
Huang, Q., Li, S., and Du, Y. (2025). Toward a comprehensive understanding of massive open online course adoption among college students, Future in Educational Research, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 317-336.
Humida, T., Al Mamun, M.H., and Keikhosrokiani, P. (2022). Predicting behavioral intention to use e-learning system: A case-study in Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur, Bangladesh, Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 2241-2265.
Lee, Y.H., Hsieh, Y.C., and Chen, Y.H. (2013). An investigation of employees' use of e-learning systems: applying the technology acceptance model, Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 173-189.
Lin, C.H., Shih, H.Y., and Sher, P.J. (2007). Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: The TRAM model, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 24 No. 7, pp. 641-657.
Lin, W. S. (2012). Perceived fit and satisfaction on web learning performance: IS continuance intention and task-technology fit perspectives, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 70 No. 7, pp. 498-507.
Liu, C. (2021). The adoption of e-learning beyond MOOCs for higher education, International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 217–227.
Lu, B., Deng, Y., Yao, X., and Li, Z. (2022). Learning goal orientation and academic performance: A dynamic model, Journal of Career Assessment, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 329-344.
Mailizar, M., Burg, D., and Maulina, S. (2021). Examining university students’ behavioural intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 7057–7077.
Meet, R. K., Kala, D., and Al-Adwan, A. S. (2022). Exploring factors affecting the adoption of MOOC in Generation Z using extended UTAUT2 model, Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 27 No. 7, pp. 10261-10283.
Mohan, M. M., Upadhyaya, P., and Pillai, K. R. (2020). Intention and barriers to use MOOCs: An investigation among the postgraduate students in India, Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 5017-5031.
Mukerjee, H. S., Deshmukh, G. K., and Prasad, U. D. (2019). Technology readiness and likelihood to use self-checkout services using smartphones in retail grocery stores: Empirical evidence from Hyderabad, India. Business Perspectives and Research, 7(1), 1–15.
Nitzl, C., Roldan, J.L., and Cepeda, G. (2016). Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: Helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 116 No. 9, pp. 1849-1864.
Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (TRI): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 307-320.
Park, J.-S., Ha, S., and Jeong, S.W. (2021). Consumer acceptance of self-service technologies in fashion retail stores, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 371-388.
Rahman, S.A., Taghizadeh, S.K., Ramayah, T., and Alam, M.M.D. (2017). Technology acceptance among micro-entrepreneurs in marginalized social strata: The case of social innovation in Bangladesh, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 118, pp. 236-245.
Rhee, B.V.D., Verma, R., Plaschka, G.R., and Kickul, J.R. (2007). Technology Readiness, Learning Goals, and eLearning: Searching for Synergy, Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 127-149.
Roy, S. and Moorthi, Y.L.R. (2017). Technology readiness, perceived ubiquity, and M-commerce adoption”, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 268-295.
Sawant, R., Thomas, B., and Kadlag, S. (2022). Reskilling and upskilling: To stay relevant in today’s industry, International Review of Business and Economics, Vol. 7 No. 1, p. 4.
Singh, B., Goyal, S., Joshi, H., Dhir, S., and Kumar, V. (2026). Determinants of MOOC adoption: TCMM-based literature review (2004–2024), Learning Futures and Emerging Technologies, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 67–89.
Statista (2026). Online Education – India, available at https://www.statista.com/outlook/emo/online-education/india?currency=USD (accessed March 20, 2026).
Tan, P.S.H., Seow, A.N., Choong, Y.O., Tan, C.H., Lam, S.Y., and Choong, C.K. (2024). University students’ perceived service quality and attitude towards hybrid learning: Ease of use and usefulness as mediators, Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 1500–1514.
Tseng, T. H., Lin, S., Wang, Y. S., and Liu, H. X. (2022). Investigating teachers’ adoption of MOOCs: The perspective of UTAUT2, Interactive Learning Environments, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 635-650.
VandeWalle, D. and Cummings, L.L. (1997). A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82 No. 3, pp. 390–400.
Vanitha, P. and Alathur, S. (2021). Factors influencing E-learning adoption in India: Learners' perspective, Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 26, pp. 5199–5236.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., and Xu, X. (2016). Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 328-376.
Virani, S. R., Saini, J. R., and Sharma, S. (2023). Adoption of massive open online courses (MOOCs) for blended learning: The Indian educators’ perspective, Interactive Learning Environments, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 1060–1076.
Walczuch, R., Lemmink, J., and Streukens, S. (2007). The effect of service employees’ technology readiness on technology acceptance, Information & Management, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 206-215.
Wang, W., Zhao, Y., Wu, Y.J., and Goh, M. (2023). Factors of dropout from MOOCs: A bibliometric review, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 432-453.
World Economic Forum (2022). Available at https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/01/online-learning-courses-reskill-skills-gap/ (accessed April 2024).
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Himanshu Himanshu, Neena Sondhi
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Management Department of the School of Economics, Management and Accounting of the University of São Paulo.
The publication of article segments is allowed, subject to prior authorization and source identification.
Copyright is regulated under Licença Creative Commons Attribution
