Psychological predictors of unhealthy eating and food security: a meta-analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-06-2025-0108Palabras clave:
Unhealthy eating, Theory of planned behavior, Food security, Meta-analysis, Public health policyResumen
PurposeThis study aims to investigates how national food security moderates the predictive relationships proposed by the theory of planned behavior (TPB) – attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control (PBC) – in the context of unhealthy food consumption.
Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted a meta-analysis of 75 studies, encompassing 427 effect sizes related to intention and behavior regarding unhealthy eating. The authors used random-effects models and meta-regressions to test the moderating role of the Global Food Security Index (GFSI), along with covariates such as sample nature, measurement strategy, behavioral framing and sample age.
FindingsAll TPB constructs showed significant positive associations with unhealthy eating. However, GFSI significantly moderated these effects. Higher national food security levels weakened the relationships between attitudes, subjective norms, PBC and unhealthy food consumption. This suggests that in more food-secure environments, psychological predictors play a less central role in dietary decision-making.
Research limitations/implicationsThe findings advance TPB by demonstrating its conditional validity under different macrostructural conditions, reinforcing the integration of ecological and structural variables in behavioral models.
Practical implicationsIn food-secure contexts, public health interventions may benefit more from structural strategies than cognitive or motivational approaches. Conversely, in food-insecure settings, targeting attitudes and perceived control remains relevant.
Social implicationsTailoring health campaigns to food security contexts can increase effectiveness and support more equitable, sustainable food systems.
Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to integrate TPB with national food security indicators, offering novel insights into how environmental structure shapes health behavior predictors in unhealthy eating.
Descargas
Referencias
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Ajzen, I. (2015). Consumer attitudes and behavior: The theory of planned behavior applied to food consumption decisions. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics (REA), 70(2), 121–138.
Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324.
Andrews, J. C., Burton, S., Gundlach, G. T., Hill, R. P., Kees, J., Netemeyer, R. G., & Walker, K. L. (2022). What exactly is marketing and public policy? Insights for JPPM researchers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 41(1), 10–33.
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta‐analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499.
Bolhuis, D. P., Roodenburg, A. J., Groen, A. P., & Huybers, S. (2024). Dutch consumers’ attitude towards industrial food processing. Appetite, 201, 107615.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed‐effect and random‐effects models for meta‐analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97–111.
Chilón-Troncos, R. F., García-Salirrosas, E. E., Escobar-Farfán, M., Millones-Liza, D. Y., & Villar-Guevara, M. (2024). Predicting willingness to consume healthy brand foods using the theory of planned behavior: The role of nutritional literacy. Frontiers in Nutrition, 11, 1353569.
Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (2002). The social psychology of food, Open University Press.
Darmon, N., & Drewnowski, A. (2008). Does social class predict diet quality? The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 87(5), 1107–1117.
Dohle, S., Diel, K., & Hofmann, W. (2015). Executive functions and the self-regulation of eating behavior: A review. Appetite, 89, 1–9.
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463.
Economist Intelligence Unit. (2022). Global food security index 2022. Retrieved from Link to Global food security index 2022
Link to the cited article.
Fechner, D., & Isbanner, S. (2025). Understanding the intention-behaviour gap in meat reduction: The role of cognitive dissonance in dietary change. Appetite, 214.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach, Psychology Press.
Hagger, M. S., & Hamilton, K. (2024). Longitudinal tests of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. European Review of Social Psychology, 35(1), 198–254.
Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Wiers, R. W. (2008). Impulsive versus reflective influences on health behavior: A theoretical framework and empirical review. Health Psychology Review, 2(2), 111–137.
Kirkpatrick, S. I., & Tarasuk, V. (2009). Food insecurity and participation in community food programs among low-income toronto families. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 100(2), 135–139.
La Barbera, F., & Ajzen, I. (2021). Moderating role of perceived behavioral control in the theory of planned behavior: A preregistered study. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 5(1), 35–45.
Loopstra, R., & Tarasuk, V. (2015). Food bank usage is a poor indicator of food insecurity: Insights from Canada. Social Policy and Society, 14(3), 443–455.
McDermott, M. S., Oliver, M., Svenson, A., & Simnadis, T. (2015). The theory of planned behaviour and dietary patterns: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive Medicine, 81, 150–156.
McEachan, R. R., Conner, M., Taylor, N. J., & Lawton, R. J. (2011). Prospective prediction of health-related behaviors with the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5(2), 97–144.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 372, n71.
Popkin, B. M., Barquera, S., Corvalan, C., Hofman, K. J., Monteiro, C., Ng, S. W., … & Taillie, L. S. (2021). Towards unified and impactful policies to reduce ultra-processed food consumption and promote healthier eating. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 9(7), 462–470.
Riebl, S. K., Estabrooks, P. A., Dunsmore, J. C., Savla, J., Frisard, M. I., Dietrich, A. M., … & Davy, B. M. (2015). A systematic literature review and meta-analysis: The theory of planned behavior’s application to understand and predict nutrition-related behaviors in youth. Eating Behaviors, 18, 160–178.
Sheeran, P., Harris, P. R., & Epton, T. (2016). The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 35(11), 1178–1188.
Stice, E., Spoor, S., Bohon, C., & Small, D. M. (2013). Relation between obesity and blunted striatal response to food is moderated by TaqIA A1 allele. Science, 322(5900), 449–452.
Story, M., Kaphingst, K. M., Robinson-O’Brien, R., & Glanz, K. (2008). Creating healthy food and eating environments: Policy and environmental approaches. Annual Review of Public Health, 29(1), 253–272.
Swinburn, B. A., Kraak, V. I., Allender, S., Atkins, V. J., Baker, P. I., Bogard, J. R., … & Dietz, W. H. (2019). The global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition, and climate change: The lancet commission report. The Lancet, 393(10173), 791–846.
Swinburn, B. A., Sacks, G., Hall, K. D., McPherson, K., Finegood, D. T., Moodie, M. L., & Gortmaker, S. L. (2011). The global obesity pandemic: Shaped by global drivers and local environments. The Lancet, 378(9793), 804–814.
World Health Organization (2021). Action framework for developing and implementing public food procurement and service policies for a healthy diet. World Health Organization, available at: Link to Action framework for developing and implementing public food procurement and service policies for a healthy diet. Link to a PDF: https://www.who.int/publications/b/56579
Zhou, Y., Nie, X., Lin, Y., Pan, S., Cao, R., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Enhancing the theory of planned behavior with social reactive constructs in explaining adolescents’ dietary behaviors. Appetite, 214.
Further reading
Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7(1), 1–15.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Valéria Abucarma Coplas Maximiano, João Otávio Montanha Endrici, Nayara Pelegrinello Panage, Fernanda Cristina Ferro Malacoski, Juliano Domingues da Silva
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Management Department of the School of Economics, Management and Accounting of the University of São Paulo.
The publication of article segments is allowed, subject to prior authorization and source identification.
Copyright is regulated under Licença Creative Commons Attribution
