Avaliação da viabilidade da implantação da triagem neonatal para distrofia muscular de Duchenne no Estado de Mato Grosso, Brasil

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-7262.rmrp.2025.213843

Palavras-chave:

Distrofia muscular de Duchenne, Triagem neonatal, Estudos de viabilidade, Avaliação da saúde

Resumo

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a viabilidade de um programa de triagem neonatal não obrigatória para Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne, no estado de Mato Grosso. Uma revisão sistemática avaliou a precisão da creatina quinase para a triagem proposta. As sínteses de evidências buscaram identificar o tratamento. A aceitação do teste foi determinada por meio de entrevistas com os pais. Foi realizado impacto orçamentário, investigação de oportunidades futuras, ameaças envolvendo testes de triagem e um painel de especialistas discutiu os resultados. A revisão sistemática incluiu 11 estudos da vida real e apontou boa precisão do teste. Com limitações importantes, um único estudo descobriu que os glicocorticoides eram bem tolerados e poderiam melhorar os escores motores. A triagem neonatal parece não resultar em danos psicossociais significativos para as famílias rastreadas e foi bem aceita pelos pais entrevistados (94,5%). O custo por caso detectado foi de R$ 37.989,65/ano e o impacto orçamentário de R$ 79.783,61 a R$ 186.161,75 do primeiro ao quinto. A intervenção é de baixo custo e provou ser precisa para triagem. No entanto, o programa de triagem foi considerado inviável por questões logísticas; ausência de tratamento específico para indivíduos rastreados e identificação de teste de creatina quinase de dois monômeros B no monitoramento do horizonte tecnológico.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Kelli Carneiro de Freitas Nakata, Health Technology Assessment Center (NATS) of the Mato Grosso State Health Department, Cuiabá, (MT), Brazil

    Pharmaceutical

  • Luisa Daige Marques, Health Technology Assessment Center (NATS) of the Mato Grosso State Health Department, Cuiabá, (MT), Brazil

    Pharmaceutical

  • Helder Cassio de Oliveira, Health Technology Assessment Center (NATS) of the Mato Grosso State Health Department, Cuiabá, (MT), Brazil

    Pharmaceutical

  • Priscilla Perez da Silva Pereira, Federal University of Rondônia, NATS of the Rondonia State, Porto Velho, (RO), Brazil

    Nurse

  • Victor Edney de Carvalho Maio, Unir

    Nursing student

Referências

Kemper AR, Wake MA. Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Issues in expanding newborn screening. Current Opinion in Pediatrics. 2007;19(6):700–4. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18025940/

Tyler KL. Origins and early descriptions of “Duchenne muscular dystrophy”. Muscle Nerve. 2003;28(4):402–22. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14506712/

Ferizovic N, Summers J, de Zárate IBO, Werner C, Jiang J, Landfeldt E, et al. Prognostic indicators of disease progression in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: A literature review and evidence synthesis. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(3). Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35333888/

Stefano MED, Ferretti V, Mozzetta C. Synaptic alterations as a neurodevelopmental trait of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neurobiol Dis. 2022;168:105718. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35390481/

Salari N, Fatahi B, Valipour E, Kazeminia M, Fatahian R, Kiaei A, et al. Global prevalence of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Reserch. 2022;17(1):96–96. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35168641/

Birnkrant DJ, Bushby K, Bann CM, Apkon SD, Blackwell A, Colvin MK, et al. Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part 3: primary care, emergency management, psychosocial care, and transitions of care across the lifespan. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(5):445–55. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29398641/

Landfeldt E, Alfredsson L, Straub V, Lochmüller H, Bushby K, Lindgren P. Economic Evaluation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: Model Frameworks for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. PharmacoEconomics. 2017;35(2):249–58. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27798808/

Ellis JA, Vroom E, Muntoni F. 195th ENMC International Workshop: Newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy 14-16th December, 2012, Naarden, The Netherlands. Neuromuscul Disord NMD. 2013;23(8):682–9. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23791627/

Darras BT, Urion DK, Ghosh PS. Dystrophinopathies. 2022; Available in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1119/

Araujo APQC, De Carvalho AAS, Cavalcanti EBU, Saute JAM, Carvalho E, França Junior MC, et al. Brazilian consensus on duchenne muscular dystrophy. Part 1: Diagnosis, steroid therapy and perspectives. Arquivos de Neuropsiquiatra. 2017;75(8):589–99. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28813090/

About Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy [Internet]. Genome.gov. [Apr 3, 2022]. Available in: https://www.genome.gov/Genetic-Disorders/Duchenne-Muscular-Dystrophy

Darras ABT. Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy: Clinical features and diagnosis. 2022. p. 1–37. Available in: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/duchenne-and-becker-muscular-dystrophy-clinical-features-and-diagnosis?search=Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy: Clinical features and diagnosis -&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~101&usage_type=default&display_r

Nakata KC de F, Pereira PP da S, Riveros BS. Creatine kinase test diagnostic accuracy in neonatal screening for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A systematic review. Clin Biochem. 2021;98:1–9. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34626608/

Sun C, Shen L, Zhang Z, Xie X. Therapeutic Strategies for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: An Update. Genes. 2020;11(8):E837. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32717791/

Wilson JMG, Jungner G, Organization WH. Principles and practice of screening for disease / J. M. G. Wilson, G. Jungner. 196. Available in: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/37650

Ministry of Health of Brazil. Neonatal Screening Indicators in Brazil. Ministry of Health. Available in: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/composicao/saes/sangue/programa-nacional-da-triagem-neonatal/indicadores-da-triagem-neonatal/indicadores-da-triagem-neonatal-no-brasil

Andermann A, Blancquaert I, Beauchamp S, Déry V. Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: A review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(4):317–9. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18438522/

Khoury MJ, McCabe LL, McCabe ERB. Population Screening in the Age of Genomic Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(1):50–8. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12510043/

Criteria for a population screening programme. GOV.UK. Available in: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/evidence-review-criteria-national-screening-programmes/criteria-for-appraising-the-viability-effectiveness-and-appropriateness-of-a-screening-programme

Cekic S, Arslan M. Validity and reliability study for the Turkish adaptation of the Parent Satisfaction Questionnaire with Neonatal Hearing Screening Programs. Hearing, Balance and Communication. 2022. 1-6.

Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932;140–1. Available in: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1933-01885-001

Information System on Live Births in Brazil. Birth by mother's residence by year of birth by federation unit. 2022. Available in: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftohtm.exe?sinasc/cnv/nvuf.def%0A%0A

Brazil. Management of the SUS Table of Procedures, Medications and OPM – SIGTAP. Available in: http://sigtap.datasus.gov.br

Genotyping - Genetic Diagnostics. Genetic testing budget. [institutional message]. Message received by: Farmaciaterapeutica@ses.mt.gov.br. 2020.

Dellamonica C, Collombel C, Cotte J, Addis P. Screening for neonatal Duchenne muscular dystrophy by bioluminescence measurement of creatine kinase in a blood sample spotted on paper. Clin Chem. 1983;29(1):161–3. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6848255/

Mah JK, Korngut L, Dykeman J, Day L, Pringsheim T, Jette N. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the epidemiology of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord NMD. 2014;24(6):482–91. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24780148/

Falzarano MS, Scotton C, Passarelli C, Ferlini A. Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: From Diagnosis to Therapy. Mol Basel Switz. 2015;20(10):18168–84. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26457695/

Zats M, Pessoa OF. News about progressive muscular dystrophies. Ciênc Hoje. 1986;5(26):26–34.

National Health Agency - ANS Tabnet. Data. Available in: http://www.ans.gov.br/anstabnet/cgi-bin/tabnet?dados/tabnet_br.def

Quotes and newsletters [Internet]. Quotes and newsletters.

Available in: https://www.bcb.gov.br/estabilidadefinanceira/historicocotacoes

Connolly AM, Zaidman CM, Golumbek PT, Cradock MM, Flanigan KM, Kuntz NL, et al. Twice-weekly glucocorticosteroids in infants and young boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2019;59(6):650–7. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30706490/

Parsons EP, Clarke AJ, Hood K, Lycett E, Bradley DM. Newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: A psychosocial study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002;86(2):91–5. Available in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1721374/

Wood MF, Hughes SC, Hache LP, Naylor EW, Abdel‐Hamid HZ, Barmada MM, et al. Parental attitudes toward newborn screening for Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2014;49(6):822–8. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24307279/

Plass AMC, Van El CG, Pieters T, Cornel MC. Neonatal screening for treatable and untreatable disorders: Prospective parents’ opinions. Pediatrics. 2010;125(1). Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20026497/

Campbell E, Ross LF. Parental attitudes regarding newborn screening of PKU and DMD. Am J Med Genet. 2003;120 A(2):209–14. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12833401/

Souza KA de O, Souza LEPF de. Incorporation of technologies in the Unified Health System: the rationale of the decision-making process of the National Commission for the Incorporation of Technologies in the Unified Health System. Saúde Em Debate. 2018;42:48–60. Available in: https://www.scielo.br/j/sdeb/a/B5SF5XcgGVhVznDbNpVpPJQ/?lang=en&format=pdf

Caetano R, Hauegen RC, Osorio-de-Castro CGS. The incorporation of nusinersena in the Unified Health System: a critical reflection on the institutionalization of health technology assessment in Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2019;35. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31483045/

Jansen ME, Lister KJ, Van Kranen, HJ, Cornel MC. Policy Making in Newborn Screening Needs a Structured and Transparent Approach. Front Public Health. 2017. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28377917/

Wald NJ, Morris JK. Assessing risk factors as potential screening tests: a simple assessment tool. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(4):286–91. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20975013/

King JR, Notarangelo LD, Hammarström L. An appraisal of the Wilson & Jungner criteria in the context of genomic-based newborn screening for inborn errors of immunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;147(2):428–38. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33551024/

Regis AH, Gonçalves JR, Gurgel CP. Considerations about rare diseases and public policies in the Brazilian context. Editorial Board 01. Dr. Alessandro Aveni (external member). Institutional Affiliation: University of Brasília (DF); Processus College (DF). 02. Dr. Arthur Henrique de Pontes Regis (external member). Institutional Affiliation: Faculdade Processus (DF)., p. 95.

Moat SJ, Korpimäki T, Furu P, Hakala H, Polari H, Meriö L, et al. Characterization of a Blood Spot Creatine Kinase Skeletal Muscle Isoform Immunoassay for High-Throughput Newborn Screening of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Clin Chem. 2017;63(4):908–14. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28209627/

Timonen A, Lloyd-Puryear M, Hougaard DM, Meriö L, Mäkinen P, Laitala V, et al. Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Newborn Screening: Evaluation of a New GSP® Neonatal Creatine Kinase-MM Kit in a US and Danish Population. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2019;5(3):27. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33072986/

Gatheridge MA, Kwon JM, Mendell JM, Scheuerbrandt G, Moat SJ, Eyskens F, et al. Identifying Non–Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy–Positive and False Negative Results in Prior Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Newborn Screening Programs: A Review. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(1):111–6. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26594870/

Chrzanowski SM, McAnally MM, Kang PB. An Opportune Time for Newborn Screening in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78(8):901–2. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34152378/

Downloads

Publicado

2026-02-13

Edição

Seção

Artigo Original

Como Citar

1.
Nakata KC de F, Marques LD, Oliveira HC de, Pereira PP da S, Edney de Carvalho Maio V. Avaliação da viabilidade da implantação da triagem neonatal para distrofia muscular de Duchenne no Estado de Mato Grosso, Brasil. Medicina (Ribeirão Preto) [Internet]. 13º de fevereiro de 2026 [citado 14º de fevereiro de 2026];58(3):e-213843. Disponível em: https://revistas.usp.br/rmrp/article/view/213843