Demand creation for testing and Covid-19 surveillance indicators in the Covid-19 Testing, Isolation, Quarantine, and Telemonitoring Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2026060006626Palavras-chave:
COVID-19, Public Health Surveillance, Primary Health Care, COVID-19 TestingResumo
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the demand creation strategies for Covid-19 testing and to describe surveillance indicators for testing, quarantine, contact tracing, and telemonitoring in primary health care services. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from the Covid-19 Testing, Isolation, Quarantine, and Telemonitoring (TQT Covid-19) study, conducted from July 2022 to July 2023. Primary healthcare service units in Rio de Janeiro and Salvador were selected to apply an intervention to develop demand creation strategies for testing uptake. Demand creation strategies were grouped into online strategies, traditional means, primary health care service units, community, and active search. Logistic regression was performed to determine the characteristics of the population reached by each strategy. The following Covid-19 surveillance indicators were estimated for testing and prevention (testing rate, positivity rate, monthly incidence, and full vaccination rate); for telemonitoring (monitoring rate, severity, referrals, and mortality); for quarantine (quarantine conditions); and for contact tracing (proportion of contacts traced and refusals of testing). RESULTS: The intervention reached 12,401 individuals, and 11,843 tests were performed. Demand creation strategies that reached more individuals for testing were primary health care service units (37.0%) and active search (25.9%). The positivity rate during the study period was 27.2% in Salvador and 11.5% in Rio de Janeiro. A total of 14.1% of cases were monitored, and most were asymptomatic (42.5%) or mild (52.3%). No deaths were reported among monitored cases. The proportion of fully vaccinated individuals was 91.8%. Contact tracing identified 25.1% of reported contacts, and 41.5% declined testing. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention facilitated expanded testing. Primary health care service units and active search were the strategies that reached more individuals for testing. Telemonitoring and contact tracing were the most challenging components to implement in primary health care services units and, given their importance, should be strengthened for future pandemics. These findings underscore the relevance of surveillance for assessing public health measures, identifying gaps, and supporting data-driven decision-making to improve epidemic management.
Referências
1. World Health Organization. COVID-19 epidemiological update – 15 July 2024 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024 [cited 2024 Jul 21]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/covid-19-epidemiological-update-edition-169
2. World Health Organization. From emergency response to long-term COVID-19 disease management: sustaining gains made during the COVID-19 pandemic. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.
3. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Painel Coronavírus [Internet]. Brazil: Ministério da Saúde; 2024 [cited 2024 Jul 21]. Available from: https://covid.saude.gov.br/
4. Ayouni I, Maatoug J, Dhouib W, Zammit N, Fredj S Ben, Ghammam R, et al. Effective public health measures to mitigate the spread of COVID-19: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11111-1
5. Mercer TR, Salit M. Testing at scale during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat Rev Genet. 2021;22(7):415-26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-021-00360-w
6. Marcel S, Christian AL, Richard N, Silvia S, Emma H, Jacques F, et al. COVID-19 epidemic in Switzerland: On the importance of testing, contact tracing and isolation. Swiss Med Wkly. 2020;150:w20225. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2020.20225
7. WHO. Public health surveillance for COVID-19: interim guidance [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2022 [cited 2024 Jul 30]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-SurveillanceGuidance-2022.2
8. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x
9. Prado NM de BL, Rossi TRA, Chaves SCL, De Barros SG, Magno L, Dos Santos HLPC, et al. The international response of primary health care to COVID-19: Document analysis in selected countries. Cad Saúde Pública. 2020;36(12):e00183820. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00183820
10. Cabral ERM, Bonfada D, Melo MC, Cesar ID, Oliveira REM, Bastos TF, et al. Contribuições e desafios da Atenção Primária à Saúde frente à pandemia de COVID-19. Interam J Health Sci. 2020;3:1-12. https://doi.org/10.31005/iajmh.v3i0.87
11. Giovanella L, Martufi V, Mendoza DCR, Mendonça MHM, Bousquat A, Aquino R, et al. A contribuição da Atenção Primária à Saúde na rede SUS de enfrentamento à Covid-19. Saúde Debate. 2020;44(spe4):161-76. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-11042020E410
12. Evans WD, French J. Demand creation for COVID-19 Vaccination: overcoming vaccine hesitancy through social marketing. Vaccines. 2021;9(4):319. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9040319
13. Wagner AD, Njuguna IN, Neary J, Lawley KA, Louden DKN, Tiwari R, et al. Demand creation for HIV testing services: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2023;20(3):e1004169. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004169
14. Magno L, Rossi TRA, Castanheira D, Torres TS, Dos Santos CC, Soares F, et al. Expansion of testing, isolation, quarantine, e-health and telemonitoring strategies in socioeconomically vulnerable neighbourhoods at primary healthcare in the fight against COVID-19 in Brazil: a study protocol of a multisite testing intervention using a. BMJ Open. 2023;13(6):e068016. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068016
15. Brasil. Secretaria Municipal de Saúde. Distritos Sanitários: Distrito Sanitário Cabula/Beiru [Internet]. Salvador: Prefeitura de Salvador; 2024 [cited 2024 Jul 30]. Available from: http://www.saude.salvador.ba.gov.br/distritos-sanitarios/#1463062811469-2991b9bd-61ff
16. Almeida EGR, Rodrigues NCP, Andrade MKN, Netto JT. Characterization of COVID-19 cases in a poor community in Rio de Janeiro/Brazil focusing on the agglomeration-poverty dichotomy. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2023;28(12):3619-29. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320232812.17812022
17. Coelho LE, Luz PM, Pires C, Jalil EM, Perazzo H, Torres TS, et al. Prevalence and predictors of anti-SARS-CoV-2 serology in a highly vulnerable population of Rio de Janeiro: A population-based serosurvey. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022;15:100338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100338
18. Dourado I, Santos C, Soares F, Veloso V, Suzart N, Rodrigues O, et al. Digital platform for surveillance of COVID-19 in primary health care services in Brazil. Popul Med. 2023;5(Suppl.). https://doi.org/10.18332/popmed/165653
19. WHO. WHO COVID-19: case definitions: updated in Public health surveillance for COVID-19, 22 July 2022 [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2022 [cited 2024 Jul 24]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Surveillance_Case_Definition-2022-1
20. Brasil. Guia de Vigilância Epidemiológica Covid-19: Emergência de Saúde Pública de Importância Nacional pela Doença pelo Coronavírus 2019 [Internet]. Brazil: Ministério da Saúde; 2019 [cited 2024 Jul 24]. Available from: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/assuntos/covid-19/publicacoes-tecnicas/guias-e-planos/guia-de-vigilancia-epidemiologica-covid-19/view
21. Aguilar Ticona JP, Xiao M, Li D, Nery N, Hitchings M, Belitardo EMMA, et al. Extensive transmission of SARS-CoV-2 BQ.1* variant in a population with high levels of hybrid immunity: A prevalence survey. Int J Infect Dis. 2024;139:159-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2023.11.039
22. Silva NS, Araújo NK, Santos KA, Souza KSC, Araújo JNG, Cruz MS, et al. Post-Covid condition and clinic characteristics associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a 2-year follow-up to Brazilian cases. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):13973. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40586-8
23. Boing AF, Boing AC, Barberia L, Borges ME, Subramanian SV. The Brazilian vaccine divide: How some municipalities were left behind in the Covid-19 vaccine coverage. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023;3(11):e0002493. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002493
24. Bevan I, Stage Baxter M, Stagg HR, Street A. Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior related to covid-19 testing: A rapid scoping review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(9):1685. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091685
25. Street A, Lee SJ, Bevan I. The hidden burden of medical testing: public views and experiences of COVID-19 testing as a social and ethical process. BMC Public Health. 2022;22:1837. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14217-2
26. Kerr LRFS, Kendall C, Almeida RLF, Ichihara MY, Aquino EML, Silva AAM, et al. Covid-19 no Nordeste do Brasil: primeiro ano de pandemia e incertezas que estão por vir. Rev Saúde Pública. 2021;55:35. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003728
27. Doraiswamy S, Abraham A, Mamtani R, Cheema S. Use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(12):e24087. https://doi.org/10.2196/24087
28. Nakayama LF, Binotti WW, Woite NL, Fernandes CO, Alfonso PG, Celi LA, et al. The digital divide in Brazil and barriers to telehealth and equal digital health care: analysis of internet access using publicly available data. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e42483. https://doi.org/10.2196/42483
29. Ferretti L, Wymant C, Kendall M, Zhao L, Nurtay A, Abeler-Dörner L, et al. Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing. Science. 2020;368(6491):eabb6936. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb6936
30. Wang CJ, Ng CY, Brook RH. Response to COVID-19 in Taiwan: big data analytics, new technology, and proactive testing. JAMA. 2020;323(14):1341-2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.3151
31. Unim B, Zile-Velika I, Pavlovska Z, Lapao L, Peyroteo M, Misins J, et al. The role of digital tools and emerging devices in COVID-19 contact tracing during the first 18 months of the pandemic: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health. 2024 J;34(Suppl. 1):i11-28. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae039
32. Feroz AS, Khoja A, Saleem S. Equipping community health workers with digital tools for pandemic response in LMICs. Arch Public Health. 2021;79(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-020-00513-z
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Direitos autorais (c) 2026 Diana Zeballos, Fabiane Soares, Laio Magno, Thais Aranha Rossi, Gabriel Alves de Sampaio Morais, Carina Carvalho dos Santos, Joice Neves Reis, Guilherme Barreto Campos, Lucas Miranda Marques, Alexandre Grangeiro, Debora Castanheira, Thiago Silva Torres, Valdilea Gonçalves Veloso, Ines Dourado
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
