Cesarean sections in a birth center

Authors

  • Ruth Hitomi Osava Universidade de São Paulo; Escola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades
  • Flora Maria Barbosa da Silva USP; Escola de Enfermagem; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermage
  • Esteban Fernandes Tuesta USP; Escola de Enfermagem; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermage
  • Sonia Maria Junqueira Vasconcellos de Oliveira USP; EE; Departamento de Enfermagem Materno Infantil e Psiquiátrica
  • Maria Clara Estanislau do Amaral Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Faculdade de Ciências Médicas; Departamento de Enfermagem

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102011000600005

Keywords:

Natural Childbirth, Cesarean Section, Birthing Centers, Risk Factors, Cross-Sectional Studies

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of cesarean sections in a birth center of a hospital and identify factors associated. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including medical records of 2,441 births assisted in a birth center in the city of São Paulo, southeastern Brazil, between March and April 2005. The dependent variable (type of delivery) included vaginal delivery and cesarean section. The independent variables were grouped into four categories: demographic characteristics; current and past obstetric history; intrapartum care; and perinatal outcomes. Prevalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated to assess the association between type of delivery and maternal and newborn variables. RESULTS: Of all deliveries, 14.9% were cesarean sections. Cesarean section in the current pregnancy was associated with past cesarean sections (PR = 3.19, 95%CI: 2.64,3.84); gestational age >; 40 weeks (PR = 1.32, 95%CI: 1.09;1.61); cervical dilation of up to 4 cm on admission (PR = 3.22, 95%CI: 2.31;4.50); and meconium-stained amniotic fluid (PR = 2.5, 95%CI: 2.05;3.06). Regarding newborn characteristics cesarean section was associated with birth weight >;4 kg (PR = 1.86, 95%CI: 1.29;2.66). Among women with history of past cesarean sections, having had also a prior vaginal delivery was a protective factor for cesarean section in the current pregnancy (PR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.30;0.71). Factors related to fetal conditions including fetal stress, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, breech presentation and macrosomia accounted for 47.8% (175) while those related to the mechanism of birth including arrest disorders, and functional and rotation dystocia accounted for 31.3% (115) of all indications for a cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of c-section was consistent with World Health Organization recommendations. Increased risk of c-section was associated with prior history of c-sections, cervical dilation of at least 4 cm upon admission, gestational age >; 40 weeks, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and birthweight >; 4 kg.

Published

2011-12-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Osava, R. H., Silva, F. M. B. da, Tuesta, E. F., Oliveira, S. M. J. V. de, & Amaral, M. C. E. do. (2011). Cesarean sections in a birth center . Revista De Saúde Pública, 45(6), 1036-1043. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102011000600005