Adoption of Covid-19 Preventive Behaviors in the Community: Salvador and Rio de Janeiro
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2026060006406Keywords:
Covid-19, Behavior, Disease Prevention, PandemicsAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of adoption of Covid-19 preventive behaviors and to evaluate associated factors among users of health units in Salvador and Rio de Janeiro. METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted between July 2022 and July 2023. Adoption of preventive behaviors was assessed based on eight behaviors, grouped into the following outcomes: social distancing; respiratory etiquette; mask use; hand hygiene; sociodemographic, housing, structural characteristics, and individual perceptions. All analyses were stratified by study site. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Poisson regression with robust variance. RESULTS: A total of 5,476 participants from Salvador and 1,940 from Rio de Janeiro were evaluated. The most prevalent preventive behaviors were respiratory etiquette (82.7 and 84.3%) and hand hygiene (84.9 and 79.1%), respectively. In Salvador, age remained associated with all behaviors assessed. In Rio de Janeiro, adoption of preventive behaviors increased among those who received a Covid-19 vaccine booster. In both cities, individuals aged 40–59 years, ≥ 60 years, and those not employed showed higher adherence to social distancing. Respiratory etiquette was more prevalent among women, individuals with complete high school education, and those who received a Covid-19 booster. Mask use and hand hygiene were associated with female sex, older age, and vaccine booster in both locations. Mask use was also more frequent among those vaccinated against influenza, while hand hygiene was associated with higher education. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reinforce the importance of public policies that promote maintenance of preventive behaviors and awareness of epidemic prevention, particularly among men, younger individuals, those with lower education, and those who do not receive recommended vaccines or booster doses.
References
1. World Health Organization. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: implications for infection prevention precautions: scientific brief [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2020 [cited on Dec 4, 2025]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/333114
2. Silva LLS, Lima AFR, Polli DA, Razia PFS, Pavão LFA, Cavalcanti MAFH, et al. Medidas de distanciamento social para o enfrentamento da Covid-19 no Brasil: caracterização e análise epidemiológica por estado. Cad Saúde Pública. 2020;36(9):e00185020. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00185020
3. Aquino EML, Silveira IH, Pescarini JM, Aquino R, Souza-Filho JA, Rocha AS, et al. Medidas de distanciamento social no controle da pandemia de Covid-19: potenciais impactos e desafios no Brasil. Ciên Saúde Colet. 2020;25(Supl. 1):2423-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020256.1.10502020
4. Razafindrakoto M, Roubaud F, Castilho MR, Pero V, Saboia J. Investigating the ‘Bolsonaro effect’ on the spread of the Covid-19 pandemic: An empirical analysis of observational data in Brazil. PLoS One. 2024;19(4):e0288894. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288894
5. Champion VL, Skinner CS. The health belief model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior and health education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008. p. 45-62.
6. Peixoto SV, Nascimento-Souza MA, Mambrini JVM, Andrade FB, Malta DC, Lima-Costa MF. Comportamentos em saúde e adoção de medidas de proteção individual durante a pandemia do novo coronavírus: iniciativa ELSI-Covid-19. Cad Saúde Pública. 2020;36(Supl. 3):e00195420. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00195420
7. Szwarcwald CL, Souza Júnior PRB, Malta DC, Barros MBA, Magalhães MAFM, Xavier DR, et al. Adesão às medidas de restrição de contato físico e disseminação da Covid-19 no Brasil. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2020;29(5):e2020432. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-49742020000500018
8. Lahiri A, Jha SS, Chakraborty A, Dobe M, Dey A. Role of threat and coping appraisal in protection motivation for adoption of preventive behavior during Covid-19 pandemic. Front Public Health. 2021;9:678566. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.678566
9. Mesenburg MA, Hallal PC, Menezes AMB, Barros AJD, Horta BL, de Barros FC, et al. Chronic non-communicable diseases and COVID-19: EPICOVID-19 Brazil results. Rev Saúde Pública. 2021;55:38. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003673
10. Fernandes TM, Costa RGR. As comunidades de Manguinhos na história das favelas no Rio de Janeiro. Tempo. 2013;19(34):117-33. https://doi.org/10.5533/TEM-1980-542X-2013173410
11. Salvador. Prefeitura de Salvador. Plano Municipal de Saúde 2022–2025 [Internet]. Salvador: Secretaria Municipal da Saúde; 2022 [cited on Oct 17, 2024]. v. 2. Available from: http://www.saude.salvador.ba.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/PMS-2022-2025-VOLUME-II_vers%C3%A3o-apresentada-ao-CMS-20.07.2022-1.pdf
12. Magno L, Rossi TRA, Castanheira D, Torres TS, Santos CC, Soares F, et al. Expansion of testing, isolation, quarantine, e-health and telemonitoring strategies in socioeconomically vulnerable neighbourhoods at primary healthcare in the fight against Covid-19 in Brazil: a study protocol of a multisite testing intervention using a. BMJ Open. 2023;13(6):e068016. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068016
13. Coelho LE, Luz PM, Pires DC, Jalil EM, Perazzo H, Torres TS, et al. Prevalence and predictors of anti-SARS-CoV-2 serology in a highly vulnerable population of Rio de Janeiro: A population-based serosurvey. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022;15:100338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100338
14. Moran KR, Del Valle SY. A meta-analysis of the association between gender and protective behaviors in response to respiratory epidemics and pandemics. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0164541. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164541
15. Galasso V, Pons V, Profeta P, Becher M, Brouard S, Foucault M. Gender differences in Covid-19 attitudes and behavior: Panel evidence from eight countries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(44):27285-91. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2012520117
16. Bronfman N, Repetto P, Cordón P, Castañeda J, Cisternas P. Gender differences on psychosocial factors affecting Covid-19 preventive behaviors. Sustainability. 2021;13(11):6148. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116148
17. Dev R, Raparelli V, Bacon SL, Lavoie KL, Pilote L, Norris CM. Impact of biological sex and gender-related factors on public engagement in protective health behaviours during the Covid-19 pandemic: cross-sectional analyses from a global survey. BMJ Open. 2022;12(6):e059673. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059673
18. Miguez FGG, Oliveira G, Enriquez-Martinez OG, Fonseca MJM, Griep RH, Barreto SM, et al. Fatores associados à adesão a comportamentos preventivos da Covid-19 em participantes do ELSA-Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2023;39(8):e00188322. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311XPT188322
19. Barbosa TP, da Costa FBP, Ramos ACV, Berra TZ, Arroyo LH, Alves YM, et al. Morbimortalidade por Covid-19 associada a condições crônicas, serviços de saúde e iniquidades: evidências de sindemia. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2022;46:e6. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2022.6
20. Kollamparambil U, Oyenubi A. Behavioural response to the Covid-19 pandemic in South Africa. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0250269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250269
21. Ozdemir S, Ng S, Chaudhry I, Finkelstein EA. Adoption of preventive behaviour strategies and public perceptions about Covid-19 in Singapore. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(5):579-91. https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.199
22. Fang F, Chen S, Geng X, Kiprop E. Survey on public awareness, attitudes and self-protective behavior adoption in different periods of Covid-19. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1063384. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1063384
23. Savci C, Cil Akinci A. Predictors of covid‐19 preventive behaviours in a sample of the Turkish population. Int J Nurs Pract. 2022;28(2):e13048. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.13048
24. World Health Organization. Key planning recommendations for mass gatherings in the context of COVID-19: interim guidance [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2021 [cited on Dec 4, 2025]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/348018
25. Silva CRM, Aquino CVMG, Oliveira LVC, Beserra EP, Romero CBA. Trust in government and social isolation during the Covid-19 pandemic: evidence from Brazil. Int J Public Admin. 2021;44(11-12):974-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1920611
26. Chioro A, Temporão JG, Massuda A, Costa H, Castro MC, Lima NT. From Bolsonaro to Lula: The opportunity to rebuild universal healthcare in Brazil in the government transition. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2023;38(3):569-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3627
27. Secretaria de Comunicação Social. Balanço 2023. Saúde em transformação: ciência, vacina e investimentos [Internet]. Secretaria de Comunicação Social; 2023 [cited on Nov 7, 2024]. Available from: https://www.gov.br/secom/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/2023/12/saude-em-transformacao-avancos-do-primeiro-ano-do-presidente-lula
28. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Censo 2022. Cidades@: Salvador - BA: Pesquisa de informações básicas municipais [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE [cited on Apr 2, 2025]. Available from: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/ba/salvador/pesquisa/10102/122229?localidade1=33
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gabriele Amorim, Danielle Souto de Medeiros, Fabiane Soares, Laio Magno, Thaís Regis Aranha Rossi, Thiago Silva Torres, Valdiléa Gonçalves Veloso, Débora Castanheira, Inês Dourado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
