Association between food knowledge and adherence to the Brazilian Food Guide
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/Keywords:
Food Guide, Food and Nutrition Education, Health Literacy, Nutrition Programs and PoliciesAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between food knowledge according to the level of food processing and adherence to the recommendations of the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population. METHODS: This study was carried out with a subsample of the NutriNet-Brazil cohort based on quotas (n = 1,053). Adherence to the Guide was assessed using a scale of dietary practices (24 items), which generates a score ranging from 0 to 72. To assess knowledge, participants indicated on a scale of 1 to 10 how healthy they considered each item on a list of 12 foods in four categories (fruit, meat, dairy products and grains), including three groups from the Nova food classification: fresh or minimally processed (G1); processed (G3); and ultra-processed (G4). To generate the score (0 to 8), two points were assigned in each category when option G1 was evaluated as healthier than G3, and both as healthier than G4. In the analysis, sample weighting was used to bring the distribution of the sample closer to the profile of the Brazilian population. T he association between the knowledge score and adherence to the Guide was tested using linear regression with adjustment for sociodemographic, socioeconomic and behavioral variables. RESULTS: The mean score for adherence to the Guide was 43.1 (SD = 9.29) and the mean score for knowledge was 5.4 (SD = 1.2). In the crude model, for every one point increase in knowledge, adherence to the Guide increased by an average of 0.8 points (p = 0.002). The association remained significant in the adjusted model, but the coefficient was reduced to 0.6 (p = 0.020) with the inclusion of socioeconomic variables in the model. CONCLUSION: Greater knowledge to recognize ultra-processed foods as less healthy is associated with greater adherence to the dietary practices recommended by the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population, reinforcing the importance of disseminating the recommendations.
References
1. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Atenção Básica. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Guia alimentar para a população brasileira. 2nd ed. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde; 2014.
2. Gabe KT, Tramontt CR, Jaime PC. Implementation of food-based dietary guidelines: conceptual framework and analysis of the Brazilian case. Public Health Nutr. 2021 Dec;24(18):6521-33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021003475
3. Oliveira MS, Amparo-Santos L. Food-based dietary guidelines: a comparative analysis between the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population 2006 and 2014. Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jan;21(1):210-7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017000428
4. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Moubarac JC, Martins AP, Martins CA, Garzillo J, et al. Dietary guidelines to nourish humanity and the planet in the twenty-first century: a blueprint from Brazil. Public Health Nutr. 2015 Sep;18(13):2311-22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980015002165
5. Adams J, Mytton O, White M, Monsivais P. Why are some population interventions for diet and obesity more equitable and effective than others? The role of individual agency. PLoS Medicine. 2016;13(5):e1002045. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002045
6. Adams J, Hofman K, Moubarac JC, Thow AM. Public health response to ultra-processed food and drinks. BMJ. 2020 Jun;369:m2391. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2391
7. Mozaffarian D, Angell SY, Lang T, Rivera JA. Role of government policy in nutritionbarriers to and opportunities for healthier eating. BMJ (Online). 2018;361. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2426
8. Hyseni L, Bromley H, Kypridemos C, O’Flaherty M, Lloyd-Williams F, Guzman-Castillo M, et al. Systematic review of dietary trans-fat reduction interventions. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95(12):821-30. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.189795
9. Trieu K, McMahon E, Santos JA, Bauman A, Jolly KA, Bolam B, et al. Review of behaviour change interventions to reduce population salt intake. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Feb;14(1):17. https://doi.org.br/10.1186/s12966-017-0467-1
10. Hyseni L, Elliot-Green A, Lloyd-Williams F, Kypridemos C, O’Flaherty M, McGill R, et al. Systematic review of dietary salt reduction policies: Evidence for an effectiveness hierarchy? PLoS ONE. 2017 May;12(5):e0177535. https://doi.or/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0177535
11. Hansen KL, Golubovic S, Eriksen CU, Jørgensen T, Toft U. Effectiveness of food environment policies in improving population diets: a review of systematic reviews. Volume 76. Eur J Clin Nutrit. 2022;76:637-46.
12. Instituto de Geografia e Estatística. Censo demográfico 2010: educação e deslocamento. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Geografia e Estatística; 2011.
13. Gabe KT, Jaime PC. Development and testing of a scale to evaluate diet according to the recommendations of the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population. Public Health Nutr. 2019 Apr;22(5):785-96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980018004123
14. Gabe KT, Jaime PC. Convergent validity and invariance analysis of a scale to measure adherence to eating practices recommended by the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2022 May;25:e220009. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720220009
15. Gabe KT, Basseto Júnior G, Jaime PC. Adaptação e validação para o contexto brasileiro de uma ferramenta para avaliação do conhecimento em alimentação baseada na classificação Nova. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2025;34:e20240335.
16. Bhawra J, Kirkpatrick SI, Hall MG, Vanderlee L, Hammond D. Initial development and evaluation of the food processing knowledge (foodprok) score: a functional test of nutrition knowledge based on level of processing. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Aug;121(8):1542-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2021.01.015
17. Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa. Critério de Classificação Econômica Brasil. São Paulo: Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa; 2016 [citado 2022 ago 15]. Disponível em: http://www.abep.org/Servicos/Download.aspx?id=12
18. Fleming-Milici F, Harris JL. Adolescents’ engagement with unhealthy food and beverage brands on social media. Appetite. 2020 Mar;146:104501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104501
19. Demers-Potvin É, White M, Potvin Kent M, Nieto C, White CM, Zheng X, et al. Adolescents’ media usage and self-reported exposure to advertising across six countries: implications for less healthy food and beverage marketing. BMJ Open. 2022 May;12(5):e058913. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058913
20. Cole SR, Platt RW, Schisterman EF, Chu H, Westreich D, Richardson D, et al. Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider. Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Apr;39(2):417-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyp334
21. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2022
22. Spronk I, Kullen C, Burdon C, O’Connor H. Relationship between nutrition knowledge and dietary intake. Br J Nutr. 2014 May;111(10):1713-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114514000087
23. Taylor MK, Sullivan DK, Ellerbeck EF, Gajewski BJ, Gibbs HD. Nutrition literacy predicts adherence to healthy/unhealthy diet patterns in adults with a nutrition-related chronic condition. Public Health Nutr. 2019 Aug;22(12):2157-69. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980019001289
24. García-Blanco L, Pascual VO, Berasaluce A, Moreno-Galarraga L, Martínez-González MÁ, Martín-Calvo N. Individual and family predictors of ultra-processed food consumption in Spanish children: the SENDO project. Public Health Nutr. 2023 Feb;26(2):437-45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898002200132X
25. Carbonneau E, Lamarche B, Provencher V, Desroches S, Robitaille J, Vohl MC, et al. Associations between nutrition knowledge and overall diet quality: the moderating role of sociodemographic characteristics-results from the PREDISE Study. Am J Health Promot. 2021 Jan;35(1):38-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117120928877
26. Gabe KT, Costa CD, Santos FS, Souza TN, Jaime PC. Is the adherence to the food practices recommended by the dietary guidelines for the Brazilian population associated with diet quality? Appetite. 2023 Nov;190:107011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.107011
27. Louzada ML, Cruz GL, Silva KA, Grassi AG, Andrade GC, Rauber F, et al. Consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados no Brasil: distribuição e evolução temporal 2008-2018. Rev Saude Publica. 2023;57(1):12. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004744
28. Santin F, Gabe KT, Levy RB, Jaime PC. Food consumption markers and associated factors in Brazil: distribution and evolution, Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013 and 2019. Cad Saude Publica. 2022 May;38(38 Suppl 1):e00118821. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00118821
29. Thomson K, Hillier-Brown F, Todd A, McNamara C, Huijts T, Bambra C. The effects of public health policies on health inequalities in high-income countries: an umbrella review. BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul;18(1):869. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5677-1
30. Løvhaug AL, Granheim SI, Djojosoeparto SK, Harrington JM, Kamphuis CB, Poelman MP, et al. The potential of food environment policies to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in diets and to improve healthy diets among lower socioeconomic groups: an umbrella review. BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar;22(1):433. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12827-4
31. Brasil. Decreto Nº 11.936, de 5 de março de 2024. Dispõe sobre a composição da cesta básica de alimentos no âmbito da Política Nacional de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional e da Política Nacional de Abastecimento Alimentar. Diario Oficial Uniao. 6 mar 2024.
32. Tambalis KD, Panagiotakos DB, Psarra G, Sidossis LS. Screen time and its effect on dietary habits and lifestyle among schoolchildren. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2020 Dec;28(4):260-6. https://doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a6097
33. Stiglic N, Viner RM. Effects of screentime on the health and well-being of children and adolescents: a systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open. 2019 Jan;9(1):e023191. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023191
34. DataReportal. Digital 2023: global overview report. 2023 [citado 2023 set 16]. Disponível em: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-global-overview-report
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kamila Tiemann Gabe, Patricia Constante Jaime
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Funding data
-
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Grant numbers 2019/01206-8
