Comparison of two methods for assessing weight gain in Brazilian pregnant women

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2026060007244

Keywords:

Reference Standards, Weight Gain, Pregnancy, Overweight

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare two methods for assessing gestational weight gain (GWG) among overweight adult pregnant women receiving care in Primary Health Care. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial conducted between 2018 and 2021 involving 260 overweight pregnant women receiving prenatal care at primary health care centers in the municipality of Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo. Participants were assigned to two groups: intervention (received individualized nutritional counseling— GI) or control (received only standard prenatal nutritional guidance—GC). Prenatal weight gain (PWG) was classified according to the U.S. guidelines of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) and in accordance with Brazilian growth curve recommendations.  To assess agreement between the methods, the kappa coefficient was used, and for the classification of weight gain (adequate, insufficient, or excessive), the criteria adopted by each method were used. Logistic regression models were employed to analyze the association between the groups (IG and GC) and the two methods used in the assessment of PWG. RESULTS: Moderate agreement was observed between the methods, with a pattern of disagreement indicating possible underestimation of GPG by the NAM guidelines. Pregnant women in the GI had a higher likelihood of insufficient GPG according to the Brazilian method (OR = 2.87; 95%CI 0.88–9.25) and a lower likelihood of excessive weight gain according to  the US method (OR = 0.63; 95%CI 0.34–1.17), compared to women in the GC, although neither finding was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The Brazilian curves proved to be more appropriate for classifying GPG in overweight Brazilian pregnant women, better reflecting weight monitoring during prenatal care. Their adoption may facilitate the early identification of GPG inadequacies and, consequently, contribute to improving the quality of prenatal care.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Dalfra’ MG, Burlina S, Lapolla A. Weight gain during pregnancy: a narrative review on the recent evidences. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;188:109913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109913

2. Institute of Medicine. National Research Council. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009. [citado 2020 12 jan]. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20669500

3. Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG committee opinion. Exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Number 267, January 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002 Apr;77(1):79-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(02)80004-2

4. World Obesity Federation. World obesity atlas 2025. London: World Obesity Federation; 2025[citado 2026 13 jan]. Disponível em: https://data.worldobesity.org/publications/worldobesity-atlas-2025-v7.pdf

5. Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL. Institute of Medicine. National Research Council. Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines. Determining Optimal Weight Gain. In: Institute of Medicine. National Research Council. Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines; Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, editors. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009. Disponível em: https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK32801/

6. Goldstein RF, Abell SK, Ranasinha S, Misso M, Boyle JA, Black MH et al. Association of gestational weight gain with maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review and metaanalysis. JAMA. 2017;317(21):2207–25. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.3635

7. Araújo RGPS, Gama SGN, Barros DC, Saunders C, Pereira APE. Diferentes métodos para avaliação do ganho de peso gestacional e sua associação com o peso ao nascer. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2021;30(1):e2020123. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-49742021000100006

8. Jiang H, Jia Y, Wang X, Zhang C, Li Y, Wang H. Evaluating the application of the 2009 Institute of Medicine gestational weight gain guidelines on pregnant Chinese women. Glob Health Action. 2023;16(1):2207659. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2023.2207659

9. Rosso P. A new chart to monitor weight gain during pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 1985;41(3):64452. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/41.3.644

10. Eduardo AS, Cecilia CL, Santoro C, Amparo AP. Propuesta de un nuevo estándar de evaluación nutricional en embarazadas. Rev Med Chil. 1997;125(11):1429-36.

11. Luke B. Nutrition during pregnancy: Part I, weight gain; Part II, nutrient supplements. JAMA. 1991;265(2):281-4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1991.03460020091036

12. Rangel T, Farias DR, Batalha MA, Freitas C, Rasmussen KM, Reichenheim ME et al. Brazilian maternal and child nutrition consortium: establishment, data harmonization and basic characteristics. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):14492. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71336-3

13. Kac G, Carrilho TRB, Rasmussen KM, Reichenheim ME, Farias DR, Hutcheon JA et al. Gestational weight gain charts: results from the Brazilian Maternal and Child Nutrition Consortium. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021;113(5):1351–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqab051

14. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Nova versão da Caderneta da Gestante traz orientações sobre alimentação, saúde bucal, trabalho de parto e nascimento. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2022 [citado 2025 jun 24]. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/pt-br/noticias/saude-e-vigilanciasanitaria/2022/05/nova-versao-da-caderneta-da-gestante-traz-orientacoes-sobre-alimentacaosaude-bucal-trabalho-de-parto-e-nascimento

15. Carrilho TRB, Rasmussen KM, Farias DR, Costa NCF, Batalha MA, Reichenheim ME et al. Agreement between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight and measured first-trimester weight in Brazilian women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):718. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03431-2

16. Farias DR, Carrilho TRB, Rasmussen KM, Hutcheon JA, Reichenheim ME, Barros DC et al. Comparison between the Brazilian and 3 international gestational weight gain charts. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022;116(4):1157-67. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac164

17. Hutcheon JA, Platt RW, Abrams B, Himes KP, Simhan HN, Bodnar LM. A weight-gain-forgestational-age z score chart for the assessment of maternal weight gain in pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Mar 6;97(5):1062–7. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.112.051706

18. Ismail LC, Bishop DC, Pang R, Ohuma EO, Kac G, Abrams B et al. Gestational weight gain standards based on women enrolled in the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the Intergrowth-21st Project: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. BMJ. 2016;352:i555. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i555

19. Santos S, Eekhout I, Voerman E, Gaillard R, Barros H, Charles MA et al. Gestational weight gain charts for different body mass index groups for women in Europe, North America, and Oceania. BMC Med. 2028;16(1):201. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1189-1

20. Sartorelli DS, Crivellenti LC, Baroni NF, de Andrade Miranda DEG, da Silva Santos I et al. Effectiveness of a minimally processed food-based nutritional counselling intervention on weight gain in overweight pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Nutr. 2023;62(1):443-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-022-02995-9

21. Barbara A, Oliva, Viana GS, Fernanda M, Torres MF, Henrique M et al. Ganho de peso excessivo em gestantes da Atenção Primária à Saúde. Contr Cienc Sociales. 2024;17(6):e6713–3. https://doi.org/10.55905/revconv.17n.6-045

22. Sartorelli DS, Crivellenti LC, Manochio-Pina MG, Baroni NF, Carvalho MR, Diez-Garcia RW et al. Study protocol: effectiveness of a nutritional intervention based on encouraging the consumption of unprocessed and minimally processed foods and the practice of physical activities for appropriate weight gain in overweight, adult, pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregn Child. 2020;20(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2705-6

23. Luna Fo B. Seqüência básica na elaboração de protocolos de pesquisa. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1998;71(6):735-40. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X1998000600016

24. Hernán MA, Hernández-Díaz S. Beyond the intention-to-treat in comparative effectiveness research. Clin Trials. 2012;9(1):48-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774511420743

25. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208

26. Clifton RG, Evans M, Cahill AG, Franks PW, Gallagher D, Phelan S et al. Design of lifestyle intervention trials to prevent excessive gestational weight gain in women with overweight or obesity. Obesity. 2016;24(2):305-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21350

27. World Health Organization – WHO. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1995;854:1-452. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8594834/

28. Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Siyam A, Nishida C, Siekmann J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(9):660-7. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.07.043497

29. Rangel T. Calculadora de escores z e percentis do ganho de peso de acordo com as novas curvas (em manutenção). Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro; 2023 [citado 2025 24 jun]. Disponível em: https://dataverse.nutricao.ufrj.br/dataset.xhtml?persist entId=hdl:20.500.12783/169

30. Observatório de Obesidade. Guia para a organização da vigilância alimentar e nutricional na atenção primária à saúde [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro; 2023 [citado 2025 jun 24]. Disponível em: http://www.observatoriodeobesidade.uerj. br/?p=3742

31. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70(4):213-20. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026256

32. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-74.

33. Hernán MA, Cole SR. Invited commentary: causal diagrams and measurement bias. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(8):959-62. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwp293

34. Cook JA, Ranstam J. Statistical models and confounding adjustment. Br J Surg. 2017;104(6):786-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10519

35. Jin C, Lin L, Han N, Zhao Z, Liu Z, Luo S et al. Excessive gestational weight gain and the risk of gestational diabetes: comparison of INTERGROWTH-21st standards, IOM recommendations and a local reference. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;158:107912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107912

36. Mardones F, Rosso P, Erazo Á, Farías M. Comparison of three gestational weight gain guidelines under use in Latin America. Front Pediatric. 2021;9:744760. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.744760

37. Jiang X, Liu M, Song Y, Mao J, Zhou M, Ma Z et al. The Institute of Medicine recommendation for gestational weight gain is probably not optimal among non-American pregnant women: a retrospective study from China. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(8):1353-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1401607

38. Beyerlein A, Lack N, von Kries R. Within-population average ranges compared with Institute of Medicine recommendations for gestational weight gain. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1111-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f734aa

39. Hanson MA, Bardsley A, De-Regil LM, Moore SE, Oken E, Poston L, Ma RC et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) recommendations on adolescent, preconception, and maternal nutrition: “Think nutrition first”. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(Suppl.4):S213–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(15)30034-5

40. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). A century of trends in adult human height. Elife. 2016;5:e13410. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13410

41. Tsai YL, Chong KM, Seow KM. Following the 2009 American Institute of Medicine recommendations for normal body mass index and overweight women led to an increased risk of fetal macrosomia among Taiwanese women. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;52(3):341-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2013.04.019

42. Muktabhant B, Lawrie TA, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M. Diet or exercise, or both, for preventing excessive weight gain in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(6):CD007145. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007145.pub3

43. Saleem T, Saleem S, Shoib S, Shah J, Ali SA. A rare phenomenon of pregorexia in Pakistani women: need to understand the related behaviors. J Eat Disord. 2022 May 21;10(1):74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-022-00589-8

44. Godoy AC, Nascimento SL, Surita FG. A systematic review and meta-analysis of gestational weight gain recommendations and related outcomes in Brazil. Clinics. 2015;70(11):758-64. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2015(11)08

45. Acris MS, Cardoso KC, Andrade JS. Importância do acompanhamento nutricional para promoção da alimentação saudável no período gestacional. Braz J Dev. 2022;8(11):73385-402. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv8n11-173

Published

2026-05-05

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Carreira, N. P., Roza, D. L. da, Sartorelli, D. S., Lima, M. C. de, & Crivellenti, L. C. (2026). Comparison of two methods for assessing weight gain in Brazilian pregnant women. Revista De Saúde Pública, 60, 18. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2026060007244

Funding data