COVID-19 among health care workers in Brazil: prevalence and disparities based on respondent-driven sampling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/s15188787.2025059006959Palabras clave:
Health Workers, COVID-19, Brazil, Prevalence, Disparities, Respondent-Driven SamplingResumen
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and disparities of COVID-19 among health care workers in Brazil. METHODS: A survey was conducted among health care workers in five Brazilian cities. Disparities in the prevalence of COVID-19 were analyzed by professional category and region (North/Northeast versus South/Southeast). RESULTS: The sample was composed of 2,499 health care workers: 601 (24.1%) nursing technicians, 1,095 (43.8%) registered nurses, and 803 (32.1%) physicians. Recruitment and data collection were conducted online from May 21, 2020, to February 10, 2021, using respondent-driven sampling. The overall COVID-19 prevalence was 48.1% (95%CI: 43.4–52.9). The highest COVID-19 prevalence was identified among nursing technicians (52.8%; 95%CI: 44.4–61.0). Nursing technicians reported undergoing fewer PCR and COVID-19 tests compared to physicians. Nursing technicians and registered nurses in the North/Northeast regions who reported COVID-19 symptoms spent much of the first year of the pandemic without access to confirmatory testing. Furthermore, the risk of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 was significantly lower for all occupational categories in the North and Northeast regions. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 rates among health care workers were exceptionally high and non-uniformly distributed. This mirrors the vast socioeconomic, cultural, and political differences and the difficulty in coordinating pandemic control actions in Brazil.
Referencias
1. World Health Organization. Brazil: WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard [Internet]. WHO; 2025 [cited 2025 Sep 2]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/region/ amro/country/br
2. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Painel Coronavírus Brasil [Internet]. Ministério da Saúde; 2025 [cited 2025 Sep 2]. Available from: https://covid.saude.gov.br/
3. The Lancet. COVID-19 in Brazil:“So what?”. Lancet. 2020 May;395(10235):1461. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31095-3
4. Kerr LRFS, Kendall C. The COVID-19 pandemic and the disaster of the response of a right-wing government in Brazil. One Health Implement Res. 2021;1:80-3. https://doi.org/10.20517/ohir.2021.11
5. Ventura DFL, Perrone-Moisés C, Martin-Chenut K. Pandemic and crimes against humanity: the “inhuman character” of health catastrophe management in Brazil. Rev Direito Práx. 2021;12(3):2206-2257. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2021/61769
6. Zhou Y, Wang W, Sun Y, Qian W, Liu Z, Wang R, et al. The prevalence and risk factors of psychological disturbances of frontline medical staff in china under the COVID-19 epidemic: workload should be concerned. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:510-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.059
7. Nishiyama JAP, Moraes RMR, Magalhães AMM, Nicola AL, Trevilato DD, Oliveira JLC. Labour, ethical and political dimensions of nursing staff sizing in the face of COVID-19. Esc Anna Nery. 2020;24:e20200382.
8. Gómez-Ochoa SA, Franco OH, Rojas LZ, Raguindin PF, Roa-Díaz ZM, Wyssman BM, et al. COVID-19 in health-care workers: a living systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, risk factors, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(1):161-75. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaa191
9. Sahu AK, Amrithanand VT, Mathew R, Aggarwal P, Nayer J, Bhoi S. COVID-19 in health care workers–A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(9):1727-31.
10. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Boletim epidemiológico nº 38 – Boletim COE Coronavírus. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2021.
11. Johnston LG, Whitehead S, Simic-Lawson M, Kendall C. Formative research to optimize respondent-driven sampling surveys among hard-to-reach populations in HIV behavioral and biological surveillance: lessons learned from four case studies. AIDS Care. 2010 Jun;22(6):784-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120903373557
12. Kendall C, Ellery AEL, Carneiro Junior N, Santana RS, Cruz LN, Cohen M, et al. Reports from the frontline: health workers describe COVID-19 risks and fears in five cities in Brazil. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):276. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09118-y
13. Marziale MHP, Cassenote AJF, Mininel VA, Fracarolli IFL, Santos HEC, Garcia GPA, et al. Risco de COVID-19 em profissionais de saúde da linha de frente e intervenções: revisão sistemática [Internet]. SciELO Preprints. 2022 [cited 2025 Sep 2]. Available from: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/3745
14. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Indicadores IBGE – Pesquisa nacional por amostra de domicílios contínua. Principais destaques da evolução do mercado de trabalho no Brasil. Brasília: IBGE; 2021.
15. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Programa Bolsa Família na Saúde [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2025 [cited 2024 Oct 16]. Available from: https://bfa.saude.gov.br/#:~:text=O%20 Programa%20Bolsa%20Fam%C3%ADlia%20%C3%A9,fam%C3%ADlias%20em%20 situa%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20de%20pobreza
16. Madeiro C. Bolsa Família tira 1,15 milhão de benefícios e tem menor volume desde 2017 [Internet]. UOL, 2019 [cited 2025 Sep 2]. Available from : https://noticias.uol.com.br/politica/ ultimas-noticias/2019/11/20/em-6-meses-governo-exclui-115-milhao-do-bolsa-familia-eprograma.htm?cmpid=copiaecola
17. Tomazelli I. Nordeste fica só com 3% das concessões do Bolsa Família [Internet]. UOL, 2020 [cited 2025 Sep 2]. Available from: https://economia.uol.com.br/noticias/estadaoconteudo/2020/03/05/nordeste-fica-so-com-3-das-concessoes-do-bolsa-familia.htm
18. Kerr L, Kendall C, Silva AAM, Aquino EML, Pescarini JM, Almeida RLF, et al. COVID-19 no Nordeste brasileiro: sucessos e limitações nas respostas dos governos dos estados. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2020;25:4099-120. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320202510.2.28642020
19. Nabaggala MS, Nair TS, Gacic-Dobo M, Siyam A, Diallo K, Boniol M. The global inequity in COVID-19 vaccination coverage among health and care workers. Int J Equity Health. 2022;21(Suppl 3):147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01750-0
20. Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva. Dossiê Abrasco – Pandemia de Covid-19. Rio de Janeiro: Abrasco; 2022.
21. São Paulo. Camara Municipal de São Paulo. Estado de São Paulo inicia vacinação contra COVID-19 [Internet]. 17/01/2021 [cited 2025 Feb 13]. Available from: https://www.saopaulo. sp.leg.br/blog/sao-paulo-inicia-vacinacao-contra-covid-19/
22. Scheffer MC, Cassenote AJF. A feminização da medicina no Brasil. Rev Bioét. 2013;21(2):268-77.
23. Liu N, Zhang F, Wei C, Jia Y, Shang Z, Sun L, et al. Prevalence and predictors of PTSS during COVID-19 outbreak in China hardest-hit areas: Gender differences matter. Psychiatry Res. 2020 May;287:112921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112921
24. Gómez-Baya D, Lucia-Casademunt AM, Salinas-Pérez JA. Gender differences in psychological well-being and health problems among European health professionals: Analysis of psychological basic needs and job satisfaction. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2018;15(7):1474. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071474
25. Zani B, Pietrantoni L. Gender differences in burnout, empowerment and somatic symptoms among health professionals: Moderators and mediators. Equal Oppor Int. 2001;20(1/2):39-48. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610150110786697
26. Ministério da Educação (BR). Portaria nº 374, de 3 de abril de 2020. Brasília: Ministério da Educação; 2020.
27. Teixeira CFdS, Soares CM, Souza EA, et al. A saúde dos profissionais de saúde no enfrentamento da pandemia de Covid-19. Ciên Saúde Coletiva. 2020;25(9):3465-74. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020259.19562020
28. Scheffer M, Almeida C, Cassenote A. Radar da Demografia Médica no Brasil. Informe Técnico. 2023;(1):26.
29. Souza PGA, Pôrto ACCA, Souza A, Silva Júnior AG, Borges FT. Perfil socioeconômico e racial de estudantes de medicina em uma universidade pública do Rio de Janeiro. Rev Bras Educ Med. 2020;44(3):e090. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v44.3-20190111
30. Kalckmann S, Santos CG, Batista LE, Cruz VM. Racismo institucional: um desafio para a eqüidade no SUS? Saude Soc. 2007;16(2):146-155. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902007000200014
31. World Health Organization. Responding to community spread of COVID-19: interim guidance, 7 March 2020. Geneva: WHO; 2020.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Ligia Kerr, Marto Leal, Rosa Lívia Freitas Almeida, Ana Zaira da Silva, Cristiane Cunha Frota, Luana Nepomuceno Gondim Costa Lima, Luciane Nascimento Cruz, Maria de Fátima Militão de Albuquerque, Mirian Cohen, Ricardo Arraes de Alencar Ximenes, Wayner Vieira de Souza, Maria Amélia de Sousa Mascena Veras, José Luis Gomes, Roberto da Justa Pires Neto, Marli Teresinha Gimeniz Galvão, Patrícia Neyva da Costa Pinheiro, Ulisses Ramos Montarroyos, Cresio Romeu Pereira, Demócrito de Barros Miranda-Filho, Paulo Roberto Borges de Souza Junior, Thália Velho Barreto de Araújo, Pedro Miguel dos Santos Neto, Cynthia Braga, Celina Maia Turchi Martelli, Carl Kendall

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Datos de los fondos
-
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Números de la subvención 444636/2023-4;465518/2014-1;312493/2021-5