Ergonomia e usabilidade no projeto de tecnologia assistiva: protocolo de revisão de escopo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2238-6149.v35i1-3e230519Palavras-chave:
Ergonomia, Design, Usabilidade , Tecnologia assistivaResumo
A Tecnologia Assistiva (TA) é essencial para promover independência, autonomia e qualidade de vida, especialmente para pessoas idosas, com doenças crônicas ou deficiência. No entanto o sucesso no uso desses dispositivos depende de sua capacidade de atender às dimensões pessoais e contextuais de quem os utiliza. Embora existam estudos sobre desenvolvimento, eficácia e usabilidade de TA, ainda há uma lacuna na literatura sobre a síntese de informações que relacionem esses fatores ao design desses produtos. Objetivos: Explicitar os procedimentos e os critérios que orientarão o mapeamento da literatura e as análises subsequentes envolvendo a aplicação dos princípios da ergonomia e usabilidade no design de tecnologia assistiva. Procedimentos Metodológicos: Este protocolo descreve uma revisão de escopo delineada com as diretrizes do modelo JBI e PRISMA-ScR, focando na exploração das evidências e visando garantir o rigor e a replicabilidade do estudo. A pergunta de revisão foi construída usando o acrônimo População, Conceito e contexto. Serão incluídos estudos originais publicados em jornais revisados por pares que abordam a relação entre TA Ergonomia e/ou Usabilidade, sem restrição de data e idiomas.
Downloads
Referências
World Health Organization. Policy brief: Access to assistive technology [Internet]. Geneva; 2021. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332222/9789240005044-eng. pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y2
Brasil. Lei no 13.146, de 6 de julho de 2015. Diário Oficial da União. 2015 Jul 6. https://www.gov.br/planalto/pt-br://www. planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13146.htm3.
World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund. Global Report on Assistive Technology [Internet]. Geneva; 2022. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/97892400494514.
Phillips H, Renda G, McDonald R. Design and assistive technology: a tinder match waiting to happen. Design Science. 2024;10:e5. doi: 10.1017/dsj.2024.2
Rodrigues ADL, Martinez LBA, Silveira ZC. An iterative design procedure for the development of assistive devices based on a participatory approach. J. of the Braz. Soc. of Mech. Sci. & Eng. 2024;46(3). doi: 10.1007/s40430-024-04695-3
Scherer MJ, Federici S. Why people use and don’t use technologies: introduction to the special issue on assistive technologies for cognition/cognitive support technologies. Scherer MJ, Federici S, editors. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37(3):315-9. doi: 10.3233/NRE-151264
Harris N. The design and development of Assistive Technology. IEEE Potentials. 2017;36(1):24-8. doi: 10.1109/MPOT.2016.2615107
Carneiro L, Rebelo F, Filgueiras E, Noriega P. Usability and User Experience of Technical Aids for People with Disabilities? A Preliminary Study with a Wheelchair. Procedia Manufacturing. 2015;3:6068-74. doi: 10.1016/j. promfg.2015.07.736
Ergonomics of Human-system Interaction - Part 11: Usability: Definitions and Concepts (ISO 9241-11:2018). 2018.
International Ergonomics Association. What is ergonomics (HFE)? [Internet]. 2023. Disponível em: https://iea.cc/about/what-is-ergonomics/#:~:text=The%20definition%20of%20 ergonomics%20(or,optimize%20human%20well%2Dbeing%20
European Committee for Standardization. Ergonomics of Human-system Interaction - Part 11: Usability: Definitions and Concepts (ISO 9241-11:2018). 2018.
World Health Organization. Global report on assistive technology [Internet]. Geneva; 2022. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049451
Ravneberg B. Usability and abandonment of assistive technology. J Assist Technol. 2012;6(4):259-69. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/17549451211285753
Cook, AM, Polgar, JM, Encarnação, P. Assistive Technologies: principles and practice. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2019.
Holtkamp FC, Wouters EJM, Verkerk MJ. Understanding User Practices When Drawing up Requirements—The Case of Designing Assistive Devices for Mobility. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16(3). doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030318
Päivinen M, Heinimaa T. The usability and ergonomics of axes. Appl. Ergon. 2009;40(4):790-96. doi: 10.1016/j. apergo.2008.08.002
Sonderegger A, Sauer J. The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: Effects on user performance and perceived usability. Appl. Ergon. 2010;41(3):403-10. doi: 10.1016/j. apergo.2009.09.002
Horton EL, Renganathan R, Toth BN, Cohen AJ, Bajcsy AV, Bateman A, et al. A review of principles in design and usability testing of tactile technology for individuals with visual impairments. Assistive Technology. 2016;29(1):28-36. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2016.1176083
Prémont MÉ, Vincent C, Mostafavi MA, Routhier F. Geospatial assistive technologies for wheelchair users: a scoping review of usability measures and criteria for mobile user interfaces and their potential applicability. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;15(2):119-31. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1539876
Nishiura Y, Nihei M, Nakamura-Thomas H, Inoue T. Effectiveness of using assistive technology for time orientation and memory, in older adults with or without dementia. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;16(5):1-7. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1650299
Prajapati G, Sharmila K. Difficulties experienced by older adults when not using assistive devices. Discov Soc Sci Health. 2023;3(1). doi: 10.1007/s44155-023-00037-1
Lim DYL, Lai HS, Yeow RCH. A bidirectional fabric-based soft robotic glove for hand function assistance in patients with chronic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023;20(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01250-4
Hansen TC, Tully TN, Mathews VJ, Warren DJ. A Multimodal Assistive-Robotic-Arm Control System to Increase Independence After Tetraplegia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2024;32:2124-33.doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2024.340883324.
Kermavnar T, Shannon A, O’Sullivan LW. The application of additive manufacturing / 3D printing in ergonomic aspects of product design: A systematic review. App Ergon. 2021;97:103528. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103528
Turkistani T, Qurban W. The effect of using three dimensional (3D)-printed assistive devices for clients with physical disabilities to increase self-independency in daily activities. J Public Health. 2020;30:849-53. doi: 10.1007/s10389-020-01362-4
Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil, H. Scoping reviews. In: Aromataris. E, Lockwood C, Porritt K, Pilla B, Jordan Z (Eds.). JBI manual for evidence synthesis. North Adelaide: JBI; 2024.27.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018;169(7):467-73. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850
Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8(45):1-10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Larissa Leite Umbelino, Carolina Maria do Carmo Alonso, Talita Silvério de Souza Silva, Larissa Boanerges Freire, Daniele Masterson Tavares Pereira Ferreira
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
