Experience Shared and Divided: Encyclopedias for Boys and Girls in Former Readers’ Commentary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-4765.rus.235324Ключевые слова:
Teenage nonfiction, Encyclopedias for girls and boys, Reception, Anthropology of reading, Internet ethnographyАннотация
This study explores the reception of Russian-language “encyclopedias for girls and boys,” a gender-segregated nonfiction genre that delineates conservative views of femininity and masculinity, serving as a form of sex education and behavioral guidance. This genre can be viewed as part of a broader “cultural backlash” following the fall of communism, analogous to trends in the West that fuel right-wing populism, albeit stemming from different historical contexts. This research investigates the interplay between the normative subjects constructed by these gendered encyclopedias and the agency of readers who may resist these prescribed ideologies. Utilizing qualitative methodology, the study analyzes internet comments from past readers, employing Maria Nikolajeva’s concept of the “identification fallacy” to understand the impact of these texts. Findings suggest that while these books create a shared communicative space for a generation of readers, regardless of gender, the intended imposition of conservative values is often met with irony and skepticism in adulthood, indicating a more nuanced impact on identity formation than the genre’s didactic nature presupposes. Along with reader reception, the social life (bytovanie) of these texts is also reconstructed: from practices of acquisition to transfer and censorship.
Скачивания
Библиографические ссылки
COCKS, Neil. “The implied reader. Response and responsibility: Theories of the implied reader in children’s literature criticism”. In: Children’s literature: new approaches. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2004, pp. 93-117.
FERREDAY, Debra. Online Belongings. Oxford: Peter Lang UK, 2009.
INOZEMTSEV, I. “Amerikanskaia entsiklopedicheskaia kniga dlia mal’chikov” [American Encyclopedic Book for Boys]. Detskaia literatura, n. 9, 1936, p. 43.
KELLY, Catriona. Refining Russia: Advice literature, polite culture, and gender from Catherine to Yeltsin. Oxford: OUP Oxford, 2001.
LANOUX, Andrea. “Laundry, potatoes, and the everlasting soul: Russian advice literature for girls after communism”. The Russian Review, v. 73, n. 3, 2014, pp. 404-426.
LANOUX, Andrea, et al. Growing out of Communism: Russian Literature for Children and Teens, 1991-2017. Leiden: Brill; Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 2022.
MARYL, Maciej. “The Anthropology of Literary Reading—Methodological Issues”. Teksty Drugie, n. 2, 2012, pp. 181-201.
MASLINSKAYA, Svetlana G.; ZAPADOVA, Tatiana G. “’Vot takoe eto pokolenie’: semeinoe chtenie v rakurse pokolencheskogo razryva” [‘This is the generation’: family reading from the perspective of the generational gap]. In: ASONOVA, E.A. (ed.). Chitatel’ v poiske. Moskva: Bibliomir, 2018, pp. 8-16.
MCCALLUM, Robyn. Ideologies of Identity in Adolescent Fiction: The Dialogic Construction of Subjectivity. London: Routledge, 2013.
MCROBBIE, Angela. The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: SAGE, 2009.
NIKOLAJEVA, Maria. “Memory of the Present: Empathy and Identity in Young Adult Fiction”. Narrative Works, v. 4, n. 2, 2019, pp. 90-108.
NIKOLAJEVA, Maria. Power, Voice and Subjectivity in Literature for Young Readers. London: Routledge, 2012.
ROGERS, Theresa. “Literary theory and children’s literature: Interpreting ourselves and our worlds”. Theory into practice, v. 38, n. 3, 1999, pp. 138-146.
SALMENNIEMI, Suvi; ADAMSON, Maria. “New Heroines of Labour: Domesticating Post-Feminism and Neoliberal Capitalism in Russia”. Sociology, v. 49, n. 1, 2015, pp. 88–105.
SCHOR, Juliet B. Born to buy: The Commercialized Child and the New Consumer Culture. New York: Scribner, 2005.
SCHWEBEL, Sara L. “The Limits of Agency for Children’s Literature Scholars”. Jeunesse: Young People, Texts, Cultures, v. 8, n. 1, 2016, pp. 278-290.
SERGIENKO, Inna A. “’Smert’ geroia’: siuzhet detskoi smerti v didakticheskoi proze kontsa XVIII veka” [‘Death of the Hero’: The Plot of a Child’s Death in Didactic Prose of the Late 18th Century]. Detskie chteniia, v. 1, n. 7, 2015, pp. 113–127.
SOTEVİK, Lena, et al. “Familiar Play: Age-Coded Heteronormativity in Swedish Early Childhood Education”. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, v. 27, n. 4, 2019, pp. 520–33.
ŚWIETLICKI, Mateusz. “Be Yourself… but Don’t Be a Wimp! Advice Literature in the USSR and Gender Roles in Contemporary Ukrainian Books for Girls and Boys”. Miscellanea Posttotalitariana Wratislaviensia, v. 7, 2018, pp. 73–85.
ŚWIETLICKI, Mateusz. “You Are Not a Doll, Not a Commodity! – Contemporary Ukrainian Advice Literature for Girls”. Slavia Occidentalis, n. 73/2, 2018, pp. 123–32.
WOOD, Elizabeth A. “February 23 and March 8: Two Holidays that Upstaged the February Revolution”. Slavic Review, v. 76, n. 3, 2017, pp. 732-740.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2025 Yauheniya Lekarevich
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — На тех же условиях») 4.0 Всемирная.
Авторы, желающие опубликовать свои работы в журнале «РУС», соглашаются со следующими требованиями:
a. Авторы сохраняют за собой авторское право и предоставляют журналу право первой публикации, при этом работа одновременно лицензируется в соответствии с лицензией Creative Commons Атрибуция 4.0 Всемирная (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), согласно которой разрешаются последующие публикации работы с подтверждением авторства и ссылкой на первоначальную публикацию в данном журнале.
b. Авторы имеют право отдельно заключать дополнительные контракты для неэксклюзивного распространения версии работы, опубликованной в данном журнале (например, публикация в институциональном репозитории или в виде книги), с подтверждением авторства и ссылкой на первоначальную публикацию в данном журнале.
c. Авторам разрешено и рекомендуется публиковать и распространять свою работу в Интернете (например, в институциональных хранилищах или на их личной странице) в любой момент до или во время редакционного процесса, поскольку это может привести к качественным изменениям, а также увеличить импакт-фактор и цитирование опубликованной работы (см. «Влияние свободного доступа» (O Efeito do Acesso Livre)
