Climate changes and technological advances: impacts on sugarcane productivity in tropical southern Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162009000500003Keywords:
global warming, water balance, agrometeorological model, sugarcane yieldAbstract
The climatic projections for this century indicate the possibility of severe consequences for human beings, especially for agriculture where adverse effects to productivity of crops and to agribusiness as a whole may occur. An agrometeorological model was used to estimate sugarcane yield in tropical southern Brazil, based on future A1B climatic scenarios presented in the fourth Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report, in 2007. Sugarcane yield was evaluated for 2020, 2050, and 2080 considering the possible impacts caused by changes in temperature, precipitation, sunshine hours and CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, as well as technological advances. Increasingly higher temperatures will cause an increase of the potential productivity (PP), since this variable positively affects the efficiency of the photosynthetic processes of C4 plants. Changes in solar radiation and rainfall, however, will have less impact. PP will increase by 15% in relation to the present condition in 2020, by 33% in 2050 and by 47% in 2080. Regarding the actual productivities (AP), the increase observed in PP will compensate for the negative effect of the projected increase in water deficit. AP will increase by 12% in relation to the present condition in 2020, by 32% in 2050 and by 47% in 2080. The increase in sugarcane productivity resulting from the projected scenarios will have important impacts on the sugarcane sector.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2009-10-01
Issue
Section
Agrometeorology
License
All content of the journal, except where identified, is licensed under a Creative Common attribution-type BY-NC.How to Cite
Climate changes and technological advances: impacts on sugarcane productivity in tropical southern Brazil . (2009). Scientia Agricola, 66(5), 593-605. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162009000500003