Medición cuántica y decoherencia: ¿qué medimos cuando medimos?

Autores

  • Olímpia Lombardi Universidad de Buenos Aires
  • Leonardo Vanni Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto AFE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662010000200006

Palavras-chave:

Aparato de medición, Entorno, Base del espacio de Hilbert, Superposición

Resumo

El problema de la base privilegiada consiste en dar cuenta de la base que define el observable medido en una medición cuántica, dada la supuesta ambigüedad teórica en la definición de dicho observable. El propósito del presente artículo es analizar este problema escasamente explorado. El objetivo final es argumentar que, contrariamente a la opinión más difundida, la teoría de la decoherencia no aporta una solución a dicho problema, no debido a su propia incapacidad, sino porque, en realidad, se trata de un pseudo-problema que no requiere solución alguna.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Adler, S. Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: a response to P. W. Anderson. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34B, p. 135-42, 2003.

Auletta, G. Foundations and interpretation of quantum mechanics. Singapore: World Scientific, 2000.

Ballentine, L. Quantum mechanics: a modern development. Singapore: World Scientific, 1998.

Blanchard, P.; Giulini, D.; Joos, E.; Kiefer, C. & Stamatescu, I. O. (Ed.). Decoherence: theoretical, experimental, and conceptual problems. Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer, 2000. (Lecture Notes in Physics, 538).

Bub, J. Interpreting the quantum world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Castagnino, M. & Lombardi, O. The role of the Hamiltonian in the interpretation of quantum mechanics. Journal of Physics. Conferences Series, 28, #, p. 012014, 2008.

D’Espagnat, B. A note on measurement. Physics Letters a, 282, p. 133-7, 2000.

Elby, A. The “decoherence”. Approach to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, p. 355-65. 1994, v. 1.

Heisenberg, W. Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischer Kinematic und Mechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43, p. 172-98, 1927.

Heiss, D. (Ed.). Fundamentals of quantum information: quantum computation, communication, decoherence and all that. Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer, 2002.

Hiley, B. J. & Peat, F. D. (Ed.). Quantum implications. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1987.

Hughes, R. I. G. The structure and interpretation of quantum mechanics, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.

Jammer, M. The philosophy of quantum mechanics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1974.

Joos, E. Elements of environmental decoherence. In: Blanchard, P.; Giulini, D.; Joos, E.; Kiefer, C. & Stamatescu, I. O. (Ed.). Decoherence: theoretical, experimental, and conceptual problems. Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer, 2000. p. 1-17. (Lecture Notes in Physics, 538).

Leggett, A. J. Reflections on the quantum measurement paradox. In: Hiley, B. J. & Peat, F. D. (Ed.). Quantum implications. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1987. p. 85-104.

Lombardi, O. & Castagnino, M. A modal-hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39, p. 380-443, 2008.

Mittelstaedt, P. The interpretation of quantum mechanics and the measurement process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Paz, J. P. & Zurek, W. H. Environment-induced decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical. In: Heiss, D. (Ed.). Fundamentals of quantum information: quantum computation, communication, decoherence and all that. Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer, 2002. p. 77-148.

Pessoa Júnior, O. Conceitos de física quântica. São Paulo: Editora Livraria da Física, 2003.

Schlosshauer, M. Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 76, p. 1267-305, 2004.

Schlosshauer, M. Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer/Verlag, 2007.

Wallace, D. Worlds in Everett interpretation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 33, p. 637-61, 2002.

Wallace, D. Everett and structure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34, p. 87-105, 2003.

Zeh, D. On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory. Foundations of Physics, 1, p. 69-76, 1970.

Zurek, W. H. Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: into what mixture does the wave packet collapse? Physical Review d, 24, p. 1516-25, 1981.

Zurek, W. H. Environment-induced superselection rules. Physical Review d, 26, p. 1862-80, 1982.

Zurek, W. H. Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical. Physics Today, 44, p. 36-44, 1991.

Zurek, W. H. Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75, p. 715-76, 2003.

Publicado

2010-06-01

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Como Citar

Medición cuántica y decoherencia: ¿qué medimos cuando medimos?. (2010). Scientiae Studia, 8(2), 273-291. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662010000200006