Indistinguibilidade, não reflexividade, ontologia e física quântica

Autores

  • Jonas Rafael Becker Arenhart Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul
  • Décio Krause Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662012000100003

Palavras-chave:

Mecânica quântica, Ontologia, Não individualidade, Indistinguibilidade, Quase conjuntos

Resumo

It has been taken as reasonable to assume that, insofar as we deal with objects that lie beyond the formalism of physical theories, quantum physics commits us to an ontology of entities that can be assumed to be both absolutely indistinguishable and, in a sense, as lacking individuality. In this article, first, we briefly and generally consider the nature of this commitment, by discussing how it can be understood in metaphysical terms, as well as its relationship with the logical systems employed to talk about the objects to which we are committed. Then we present some of the main aspects of orthodox quantum mechanics that are usually employed to provide arguments for suggesting an ontology of objects having these features, that is, of objects that are both indistinguishable and have no individuality. Finally, we sketch the main features of quasi-set theory, a system of set theory, for the purpose of capturing formally these features in a natural way, and for employing it as the underlying logic for grounding a metaphysics of non-individuals.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Arenhart, J. R. B. & Krause, D. Quantifiers and the foundations of quasi-set theory. Principia, 13, 3, p. 251-68, 2009.

Auyang, S. How is quantum field theory possible? Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.

Bitbol, M. Mécanique quantique: une introduction philosophique. Paris : Flammarion, 1996.

Black, M. The identity of indiscernibles. Mind, 61, 242, p. 153-64, 1952.

Cao, T. Y. (Ed.). Conceptual foundations of quantum field theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

da Costa, N. C. A. Logic and ontology. Principia, 6, 2, p. 279-98, 2002.

da Costa, N. C. A. Ensaio sobre os fundamentos da lógica. 3 ed. São Paulo: Hucitec/Edusp, 2008.

da Costa, N. C. A.; Bueno, O. A. & Béziau, J-Y. What is semantics? Sorites, 3, p. 43-7, 1995.

Domenech, G.; Holik, F. & Krause, D. Quasi-spaces and the foundations of quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 38, p. 969-94, 2008.

Domenech, G. et al. No labeling quantum mechanics of indiscernible particles. Internacional Journal of Theorethical Physics, 49, 12, p. 3085-91, 2010.

French, S. & Krause, D. Identity in physics: a historical, philosophical and formal analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Jammer, M. The philosophy of quantum mechanics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1974.

Krause, D. The metaphysics of non-individuality. In: Krause, D. & Videira, A. A. (Ed.). Brazilian studies in philosophy and history of science. New York: Springer, 290, 2010. Cap. 19. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science).

Krause, D. [2011], ‘The problem of identity and a justification for non-reflexive quantum mechanics’, pré-publicação.

Krause, D. & Arenhart, J. R. B. Hume, Schrödinger e a individuação de objetos físicos. Revista Eletrônica de Informação e Cognição, 5, 2, p. 59-71, 2006.

Krause, D. & Arenhart, J. R. B. Structures and models of scientific theories: a discussion on quantum non-individuality. 2010. Disponível em: <http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/5564/1/ LogUniv.pdf.>. Acesso em: 20/nov./2011.

Krause, D.; Arenhart, J. R. B. & Moraes, F. T. Axiomatic theories and their models. 2010. Disponível em: <http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/5563/1/ Models.pdf>. Acesso em: 20/out./2011.

Krause, D. & Videira, A. A. (Ed.). Brazilian studies in philosophy and history of science. New York: Springer, 290, 2010. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science).

Kuhn, T. S. Black-body theory and the quantum discontinuity, 1894-1912. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1987.

Lévy-Leblond, J. M. & Balibar, F. Quantics: rudiments of quantum physics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990.

Lowe, E. J. The possibility of metaphysics: substance, identity and time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Penrose, R. The emperor’s new mind. London: Vintage, 1989.

Pessoa Jr., O. Conceitos de física quântica. São Paulo: Livraria da Física Editora, 2003.

Pessoa Jr., O. Conceitos de física quântica. S. Paulo: Livraria da Física Editora, 2006. V. 2.

Quine, W. V. O. From a logical point of view. New York: Harper and Row, 1964.

Rohrlich, F. On the ontology of QFT. In: Cao, T. Y. (Ed.). Conceptual foundations of quantum field theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. p. 357-67.

Schrödinger, E. What is matter? Scientific American, Sept., p. 52-7, 1953.

Styer, D. S. et al. Nine formulations of quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 70, 3, p. 288-97, 2002.

Suny-Buffalo. Ontology. Buffalo: State University of New York, 2012. Disponível em: <http://ontology.buffalo.edu/>. Acesso em: 17/jan./2012.

van Inwagen, P. Metaphysics. In: Zalta, N. E. (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. 2010URL. Disponível em: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ fall2010/entries/metaphysics/> Acesso em: 20/out./2011.

Vickers, P. Can partial structutures accommodate inconsistent science? Principia, 13, 2, p. 195-232, 2009.

Wien Universität. Quantum optics, quantum nanophysics, quantum information laboratory. Disponível em: <http://www.quantum.at/index.php?id=40>. Acesso em: 12/dez./2011.

Zalta, N. E. (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.2010URL. Disponível em: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/metaphysics/>. Acesso em: 20/out./2011.

Downloads

Publicado

2012-01-01

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Como Citar

Indistinguibilidade, não reflexividade, ontologia e física quântica . (2012). Scientiae Studia, 10(1), 41-69. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662012000100003