Scientific progress and incomensurability in Thomas Kuhn
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662007000200003Keywords:
Kuhn, Scientific progress, Incommensurability, ParadigmAbstract
Despite many criticisms received along his academic career, Thomas Kuhn has undoubtedly advanced a new image about scientific progress. He showed that progress occurs in two different, but complementary directions. His thesis was that scientific development occurs through the essential tension between what is normal and what is revolutionary in science. According to Kuhn, there is progress in the sense of profounding of knowledge, given by the acquisition of a paradigm, and there is progress by means of the enlargement of knowledge accomplished by the emergence of incommensurability. The main point developed in this article states that Kuhn's problem was to think incommensurability and paradigms as concepts which have only linguistic and theoretical meanings.Downloads
References
Abrantes, P. Kuhn e a noção de “exemplar”. Principia, 2, p. 61-102, 1998.
Biagioli, M. The anthropology of incommensurability. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 21, p. 183-209, 1990.
Chang, H. History and philosophy of science as a continuation of science by other means. Science & Education, 9, p. 59-75, 2000.
Cheng, X. Thomas Kuhn’s latest notion of incommensurability. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 28, p. 257-73, 1997.
Fernando, G. (Org.). A ciência tal qual ela se faz. Lisboa: Edições João Sá da Costa, 1999.
Fuller, S. Thomas Kuhn: a philosophical history for our time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2000.
Galison, P. Culturas etéreas e culturas materiais. In: Fernando, G. (Org.). A ciência tal qual ela se faz. Lisboa: Edições João Sá da Costa, 1999. p. 395-414.
Galison, P. & Stump, D. (Org.). The disunity of science: boundaries, contexts, and power. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.
Kuhn, T. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1975.
Kuhn, T. A tensão essencial. Lisboa: Edições 70, 1980.
Kuhn, T. Commensurability, comparability, communicability. In: Kuhn, T. The road since structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, p. 33-57, 2000a.
Kuhn, T. What are scientific revolutions? In: Kuhn, T. The road since structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, p. 13-32, 2000b.
Kuhn, T. The road since structure. In: Kuhn, T. The road since structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, p. 90-104, 2000c.
Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. (Org.). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
Larvor, B. Why did Kuhn’s SSR cause a fuss? Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 34, p. 369-90, 2003.
Mastermann, M. The nature of paradigm. In: Lakatos, I. & Musgrave (Org.). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970. p. 59-90.
Nola, R. Saving Kuhn from the sociologists of science. Science & Education, 9, p. 77-90, 2000.
Putnam, H. Razão, verdade e história. Lisboa: Dom Quixote, 1992.
Rouse, J. Knowledge and power: toward a political philosophy of science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987.
Sankey, H. Kuhn’s ontological relativism. Science & Education, 9, p. 59-75, 2000.
Shapere, D. Reason and the search for knowledge: investigations in the philosophy of science. Dordrecht: Dordrecht Reidel, 1984.
Stump, D. From epistemology and metaphysics to concrete connections. In: Galison, P. & Stump, D. (Org.). The disunity of science: boundaries, contexts, and power. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996. p. 255-86.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2007 Scientiae Studia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
A revista detém os direitos autorais de todos os textos nela publicados. Os autores estão autorizados a republicar seus textos mediante menção da publicação anterior na revista. A revista adota a Licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.
