Produção e reprodução, casa e trabalho
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20702014000100008Resumo
Com base na análise da relação entre casa e trabalho, e do significado dessa relação para a prática do cuidado, o artigo desenvolve uma crítica aos argumentos de Betty Friedan no livro A mística feminina, entendido como uma irônica continuidade do projeto marxista de reduzir a emancipação das mulheres à obtenção de um emprego fora de casa. Assumindo uma oposição entre cuidado e trabalho, amor e dinheiro, certas feministas renegaram o trabalho doméstico. Entretanto, o movimento organizado das trabalhadoras em domicílio, que luta pelo reconhecimento legal de seu trabalho, tem sublinhado a interconexão entre reprodução social e produção; ao mesmo tempo, teóricos têm questionado a ética do trabalho assentada num paradigma produtivista da vida social.
Downloads
Referências
Benería, Lourdes. (1977), “Comments des progrès intervenus dans l’application du principe de l’egalité de chances et de traitement pour les travailleuses: inventaire des données à rassembler”. Minute Sheet, 6.6.77, wn-1-1-02-1000, Arquivos oit, Genebra.
. (1979), “Reproduction, production and the sexual division of labour”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 3 (3): 203-225.
Bianchi, Suzanne. (2010), “Family change and time allocation in American families”. Focus on Workplace Flexibility, Working Paper. Disponível em http://workplaceflexibility.org/images/uploads/program_papers/bianchi__family_change_and_time_allocation_in_american_families.pdf.
Boris, Eileen. (1994), “The home as a workplace: deconstructing dichotomy”. International Review of Social History, 39: 415-428.
Boris, Eileen & Klein, Jennifer. (2012), Caring for America: home health workers in the shadow of the Welfare State. Nova York, Oxford University Press.
Boris, Eileen & Lewis, Carolyn. (2006), “Caregiving and wage-earning: a historical perspective on work and family”. In: Pitt-Catsouphes, Marcie, Kossek, Ellen & Sweet, Stephen (orgs.). The work and family handbook: multi-disciplinary perspectives and approaches. Mahwah, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 73-97.
Congresso dos Estados Unidos. (1954), “Extension of old-age and survivors insurance to additional groups of current workers”. Relatório do Grupo Consultivo ao Congresso dos Estados Unidos, Câmara dos Deputados (House of Representatives), Committee on Ways and Means, Hearings Before the Committee on Ways and Means on H.R. 7199, Social Security Amendments of 1954, 83ª Legislatura, 2ª Sessão. Washington, dc, gpo.
Dwyer, Joseph de la Torre. (2012), “Gender equity still requires a focus on the ‘second shift’”. The Feminist Wire. Disponível em http://thefeministwire.com/2012/04/gender-equity-still-requires-a-focus-on-the-second-shift/, consultado em 13/5/2012.
Ehrenreich, Barbara & Hochschild, Arlie Russell. (2002), Global woman: nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy. Nova York, Metropolitan Books.
Engels, Frederick. (2010), The origin of the family, private property and the State. Nova York, Penguin Classics.
England, Paula. (2005), “Emerging theories of care work”. Annual Review of Sociology, 31: 381-399.
Federici, Silvia. (2012), Revolution at point zero: housework, reproduction, and feminist struggle. Oakland, ca, pm press.
Folbre, Nancy. (2001), The invisible heart: economics and family values. Nova York, New Press.
Fortunati, Leopoldina. (1989), Arcane of reproduction. Nova York, Autonomedia.
Fraser, Nancy. (1990), “The struggle over needs: outline of a socialist feminist critical theory of late capitalist political culture”. In: Gordon, Linda (org.). Women, the State, and welfare. Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 199-225.
Friedan, Betty. (1963), The feminine mystique. Nova York, Dell.
Glenn, Evelyn Nakano. (1992), “From servitude to service work: historical continuities in the racial division of paid reproductive labor”. Signs, pp. 1-43, Autumn.
. (2000), “Creating a caring society”. Contemporary Sociology, 29: 84-94.
Greenhouse, Steven. (2013), “U.S. to include home care aides in wage and overtime law”. New York Times, 17 de setembro.
Held, Virginia. (2002), “Care and the extension of markets”. Hypatia, 17, Spring.
Himmelweit, Susan. (1999), “Caring labor”. annals, aapss, 561, January.
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. (2003), The commercialization of intimate life: notes from home and work. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Hochschild, Arlie & Machung, Anne. (2003), The second shift. Nova York, Penguin.
Horowitz, Daniel. (1998), Betty Friedan and the making of The feminine mystique: the American left, the Cold War, and modern feminism. Amherst, University of Massachusetts Press.
Hosey, Sara. (2012), “Rejecting the rhetoric of the ‘second shift’ and insisting on equity”. The Feminist Wire, 26 de março. Disponível em http://thefeministwire.com/2012/03/rejecting-the-rhetoric-of-the-second-shift-and-insisting-on-equity/, consultado em 10/5/2012.
Inman, Mary. (1940), In women’s defense. Los Angeles, The Committee to Defend Women’s Advancement.
Kessler-Harris, Alice. (2003), “In pursuit of economic citizenship”. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State, and Society, 10, Summer.
Levenstein, Lisa. (2014), “‘Don’t agonize, organize!’ The displaced homemakers campaign and the contested goals of 1970s feminism”. The Journal of American History, 100 (4): 144-1680.
Levitan, Sar A. (1972), “Statement prepared for the Subcommittee on Labor, Senate Committee on Labor and Public Welfare”. Congresso dos Estados Unidos, Senado, Committee on Labor and the Public Welfare, Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1971, Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Labor of the Committee on Labor and Public Welfare on S. 1861 and S.2259, 92ª Legislatura, 1ª Sessão. Washington, dc, gpo. Parte 5, 1788.
MacDonald, Cameron Lynne & Merrill, David A. (2002), “‘It shouldn’t have to be a trade’: recognition and redistribution in care work advocacy”. Hypatia, 17, Spring.
Malos, Ellen (org.). (1995), The politics of housework. Londres, New Clarion Press.
May, Vanessa. (2011), Unprotected labor: household workers, politics, and middle-class reform in New York, 1870-1940. Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press.
Nadasen, Premilla. (2012), “Citizenship rights, domestic work, and the fair labor standards act”. Journal of Policy History, 24 (1).
Noddings, Nell. (2002), Starting at home: caring and social policy. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Olcott, Jocelyn. (2011), “Introduction: researching and rethinking the labors of love”. Hispanic American Historical Review, 91: 1-27.
Orloff, Ann. (1996), “Gender in the Welfare State”. Annual Review of Sociology, 22: 51-78.
Palmer, Phyllis. (1989), Domesticity and dirt: housewives and domestic servants in the United States, 1920-1945. Philadelphia, Temple University Press, pp. 118-135.
. (1995), “Outside of the law: domestic and agricultural workers under the fair labor standards act”. Journal of Policy History, 7 (4): 416-440.
Parreñas, Rhacel Salazar. (2001), Servants of globalization. Stanford, Stanford University Press.
Poole, Mary. (2006), The segregated origins of social security: African Americans and the Welfare State. Chapel Hill, University of California Press.
Roberts, Dorothy E. (1997), “Spiritual and menial housework”. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 9: 51-80.
Stone, Deborah. (2000), “Caring by the book”. In: Meyer, Madonna Harrington (org.). Care work: gender, labor, and the Welfare State. Nova York, Routledge.
usa today. (2013), “Men vs. women: How much time spent on kids, job, chores?”. Disponível em http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/03/14/men-women-work-time/1983271.
Weeks, Kathi. (2009), “‘Hours for what we will’: work, family, and the movement for shorter hours”. Feminist Studies, 35, Spring.
. (2011), The problem with work. Durham, Duke University Press.
Williams, Joan C. & Zelizer, Viviana A. (2005), “To commodify or not to commodify: that is not the question”. In: Ertman, Martha M. & Williams, Joan C. Rethinking commodification: cases and readings in law and culture. Nova York, New York University Press.
Zelizer, Viviana A. (2005), The purchase of intimacy. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2015 Tempo Social
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
