Populism, democracy and property: An interview with Mark Devenney
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2026.243709Keywords:
Populism, Democracy, Property, Post-foundational theory, Far rightAbstract
In this interview, the philosopher Mark Devenney, professor at the University of Brighton and co-director of the Centre for Applied Philosophy, Politics and Ethics (Cappe), discusses the scope and limits of populist theory within post-foundational and post-Marxist thought. He distinguishes populism from democracy and argues that democracy must be understood as an incessant practice of equality that destabilises “proper” ways of being, while reintroducing property and colonial legacies as central to the analysis of contemporary political logics. The conversation also turns to recent Brazil, strained between Lulism and the rise of the far right, and to the dilemmas of the left in the face of historical inequality, coloniality and environmental destruction.
Downloads
References
ADORNO, Theodor W. & HORKHEIMER, Max. (1985), Dialectic of Enlightenment. London: Verso.
ADORNO, Theodor W. (2020), Aspects of the New Right Extremism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
ALTHUSSER, Louis. (1969), ‘Marxism and humanism’. In: ALTHUSSER, Louis. For Marx. London: Allen Lane.
BROWN, Wendy. (2010), Walled State, Waning Sovereignty. New York: Zone Books.
BROWN, Wendy. (2015), Undoing the Demos, New York: Zone Books.
BROWN, Wendy. (2018), “Neoliberalism’s Frankenstein: authoritarian freedom in twenty-first century ‘democracies’”. Critical Times, 1: 1, pp. 60–79.
BUTLER, Judith. (2015), Notes toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
DEVENNEY, Mark. (2020), Towards an Improper Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
DERRIDA, Jacques. (2008), The Animal That Therefore I Am. New York: Fordham University Press.
DOUGLASS, Patrice & WILDERSON, Frank. (2013), “The Violence of Presence: Metaphysics in a Blackened World”. The Black Scholar, 43: 4, pp. 117-123.
FREUD, Sigmund. (1974), “Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego”. In: FREUD, Sigmund. The Standard Edition of the Complete Works of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 18, The Hogart Press: London, pp. 67-143.
LACLAU, Ernesto. (2005), On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
LACLAU, Ernesto. (2007), Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
LACLAU, Ernesto. (2014), The Rhetorical Foundations of Society. London: Verso.
MARCHART, Oliver. (2018), Thinking Antagonism: Political Ontology after Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
MARX, Karl. (1976), Capital: Volume 1. London: Penguin, Harmondsworth.
MENDONÇA, Daniel; LINHARES, Bianca & DEVENNEY, Mark. (Prelo), Populist Politics in Brazil. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
MOUFFE, Chantal. (2018), For a Left Populism. London: Verso.
OBER, Josiah. (2008), “The original meaning of ‘democracy’: capacity to do things, not majority rule”. Constellations, 15: 1, pp. 3–9.
RANCIÈRE, Jacques. (1999), Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
SAVINO, Lucas. (2016), “Landscapes of contrast: the neo-extractivist state and indigenous peoples in ‘post-neoliberal’ Argentina”. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3: 2, pp. 404–15.
SCHMITT, Carl. (2003), Nomos of the Earth. New York: Telos Press.
STAVRAKAKIS, Yannis. (2000), The Lacanian Left. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
WYNTER, Sylvia & MCKITTRICK, Katherine (ed.). (2015), Sylvia Wynter: on being human as praxis. Durham: Duke University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Funding data
-
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Grant numbers 173359/2023-0