Punição e responsabilidade na tradição durkheimiana

Autores

  • Alexandre Braga Massella Depto. de Sociologia - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2026.245577

Palavras-chave:

Sociologia da punição, Responsabilidade penal, Responsabilidade moral, Emile Durkheim, Paul Fauconnet

Resumo

O artigo trata do tema da responsabilidade penal e moral, tal como estudado por P. Fauconnet, discípulo de E. Durkheim. A reflexão de Fauconnet permite acrescentar um elo importante nas reflexões de Durkheim sobre a punição, ao analisar os processos sociais simbólicos que designam a quem a pena será aplicada. São exploradas as articulações entre a justiça penal e os ideais morais constitutivos da sociedade moderna segundo a visão durkheimiana.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Alexandre Braga Massella, Depto. de Sociologia - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)

    Docente do Departamento de Sociologia da Universidade de São Paulo. E-mail: massella@usp.br.

    http://lattes.cnpq.br/2732133552310245 

Referências

APPLEBAUM, B. (2010), Being white, being good. White complicity, white moral responsibility, and social justice pedagogy. United Kingdom, Lexington Books.

ARNAUD, A-J. (1975), Les juristes face à la société. Paris, PUF.

BESNARD. P. (1983), The sociological domain. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

BOUGLÉ, C. (1907), Le solidarisme. Paris, V. Giard & E. Brière.

BRAITHWAITE, J. e PETTIT, P. (2015), No sólo su merecido. Por una justicia penal que vaya más allá del castigo. Argentina, Siglo Veintiuno.

BRAITHWAITE, J. e FISSE, B. (1993), Corporations, crime and accountability. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

CARVALHO, H. e CHAMBERLEN, A. (2017), “Why punishment pleases: Punitive feelings in a world of hostile solidarity”. Punishment & Society, 20 (2): 217–234.

CHRISTIE, Nils. (1989), “Las imágenes del hombre en el derecho penal moderno”. In: HULSMAN L. et al. Abolicionismo penal. Buenos Aires, Ediar.

COMBESSIE, P. (2007), “Paul Fauconnet et l’imputaion pénale de la responsabilité”. Anamnese, 3: 221-246.

CONSOLIM, M. (2021), “Circulação de intelectuais e recepção das novas ciências do homem no Brasil: 1908-1932”. Tempo Social, 33 (1): 17-51.

COTTERRELL, R. (1999), Emile Durkheim: law in a moral domain. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.

COTTERRELL, R. (2013), “Classical social theory and ideas of responsibility and the state in France and Germany”. Comparative Law Review, 15: 21-44.

DAGAN, H. (1899), Enquête sur l’antisemitisme. Paris, P. V. Stock Ed.

DAVIDOVITCH, A. (1977), “Durkheim et les durkheimiens: religion, connaissances, droit”. L’année sociologique, 28: 7-18.

DICRISTINA, B. (2000), “Compassion can be cruel: Durkheim on sympathy and punishment”. Justice Quarterly, 17 (3): 485-517.

DUFF, R. A. (2003), Punishment, communication and community. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

DUFF, R. A. (2007), Answering for crime. Responsibility and liability in the criminal law. Oxford, Hart Publishing.

DURKHEIM, E. ([1893] 1975), “Définition du fait moral”. In: DURKHEIM, E. Textes. 2. Religion, morale, anomie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.

DURKHEIM, E. (1922), De la Division du travail social. Paris, Félix Alcan.

DURKHEIM, E. ([1890] 1970), “Les principes de 1789 et la sociologie”. In: DURKHEIM, E. La science sociale et la action. Paris, PUF.

DURKHEIM, E. ([1898] 1970), “L’individualisme et les intellectuels”. In: DURKHEIM, E. La science sociale et la action. Paris, PUF.

DURKHEIM, E. (1899), “Deux lois de l’évolution pénale”. In: DURKHEIM, E. Journal Sociologique. Paris, PUF.

DURKHEIM, E. (1950), Leçons de sociologie. Paris, PUF.

DURKHEIM, E. (1988), Les Règles de la Méthode Sociologique. Paris, Champs Flammarion.

DURKHEIM, E. (1992a), L’éducation morale. Paris, PUF.

DURKHEIM, E. (1992b), Le socialisme. Paris, PUF.

DURKHEIM, E. (1995), Le suicide. Paris, PUF.

DURKHEIM, E. (2015), Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Paris. Classiques Garnier.

DURKHEIM, E. (2022), Leçons de Sociologie Criminelle. Paris, Flammarion.

ERIKSON, K. (1962), “Notes on the sociology of deviance”. Social Problems, 9 (4): 307-314.

EWALD, F. (1986), L’Etat providence. Paris, Bernard Grasset.

FAUCONNET, P. (1920), La responsabilité: étude sociologique. Paris, Félix Alcan.

FEINBERG, J. (1965), “The expressive function of punishment”. The Monist, 49 (3): 397-423.

FILLOUX, J-C. (1977), Durkheim et le socialisme. Genève, Librairie Droz.

GARLAND, D. (1990), Punishment and modern society. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

GARLAND, D. (1996), “The limits of the sovereign state”. The British Journal of Criminology, 36 (4): 445-471.

GARLAND, D. (2013), “Punishment and social solidarity”. In: Simon, J. e Sparks, R. (2013). The Sage Handbook of Punishment and Society. Londres, Sage Publications, pp. 47-73.

GLUCKMAN, M. (Ed.) (1972), The allocation of responsibility, Manchester, Manchester University Press.

HAMPTON, J. (1984), “The moral education theory of punishment”. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 13 (3): 208-238.

HART, H. L. A. (2008), Punishment and responsibility. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

HONDERICH, T. (2006), Punishment. The supposed justifications. London, Pluto Press.

HUNT, A. (1978), The sociological movement in law. London, The Macmillan Press.

JOAS, H. (2008), “Punishment and respect”. Journal of the classical sociology 8 (2): 159-177.

KARSENTI, B. (2006), La société en personnes. Études durkheimiennes. Paris, Economica.

KUTZ, C. (2000), Complicity: Ethics and law for a collective age. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

LANDRY, A. (1902), La responsabilité pénale. Paris, Félix Alcan.

LELIS, R. (2021), A Elaboração da Sociologia Durkheimiana da Religião: a colaboração entre Émile Durkheim, Henri Hubert e Marcel Mauss. Tese de doutorado, Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, São Paulo.

LEWIS, H. D. “Collective responsibility” ([1948] 1991). In: MAY, L. e HOFFMAN, S. Collective responsibility. Five decades of debate in theoretical and applied ethics. New York, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

LOGUE, W. (1983), From philosophy to sociology. The evolution of French liberalism, 1870-1914. Illinois, Northern Illinois University Press.

LUKES, S. & SCULL, A. (1983), Durkheim and the law. Oxford, Martin Robertson & Company Ltd.

MCGARY, H. (1991), “Morality and collective liability”. In: MAY, L. e HOFFMAN, S. Collective responsibility. Five decades of debate in theoretical and applied ethics, New York, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

MELOSSI, D. (2000), “Changing representations of the criminal”. British Journal of Criminology, 40 (2): 296-320.

MILLER, S. & MAKELA, P. (2005), “The collectivist approach to collective moral responsibility”, Metaphilosophy, 36 (5): 634-651.

NIZAN, P. (1998), Les chiens de garde. Marseille, Agone.

OGLETREE, C. Jr. & SARAT, A. (2015), Punishment in Popular Culture. New York, New York University Press.

PIAGET, J. (1965), The moral judgment of the child. Illinois, The Free Press.

PIZARRO NOËL, F. (org.) (2020), “Un manuscrit inédit de Durkheim: Physique génerale du droit et des moeurs, IVe Année du Cours. 1re Leçon, 2 Décembre 1899, Plan du Cours - Les Sanctions pénales”. Durkheimian Studies, 24 (1): 33-44.

PONCELA, P. (1977), “Autour de l’ouvrage de Paul Fauconnet: une dimension sociologique de la responsabilité pénale”. Archives de Philosophie du Droit, 22: 131-141.

PRIMORATZ, I. (1989), “Punishment as language”. Philosophy, 64 (248): 187-205.

REINER, R. (1984), “Crime, law and deviance: the Durkheim legacy”. In: FENTON, S. Durkheim and modern sociology. New York, Cambridge University Press.

RILEY, A. (2010), Godless intellectuals? New York, Berghahn Books.

ROBERT, CHRISTIAN-NILS. (1986), L’impératif sacrificiel. Suisse, Editions d’En Bas.

ROSATI, M. (2008), “Evil and collective responsibility: the Durkheimian legacy and contemporary debates”. In: PICKERING, W. S. F. e ROSATI, M. Suffering and evil: the Durkheimian legacy. Oxford, Berghahn Books.

SALEILLES, R. (1897), Accidents de travail et la responsabilité civile. Essai d’une théorie objective de la responsabilité délictuelle. Paris, Arthur Rousseau Éditeur.

SAPIRO, G. (2008), “De la responsabilité pénale à l'éthique de responsabilité. Le cas des écrivains”. Revue française de science politique, 58 (6): 877-898.

SCHATTENBERG, G. (1981), “Social Control Functions of Mass Media Depictions of Crime”, Sociological Inquiry, 51 (1): 71-77.

SELIGMAN, A. B. (2000), Modernity’s Wager. Authority, self and transcendence. Princeton, Princeton Univ. Press.

SIMON, P. J. (2007), “Paul Fauconnet, L’oublié des oubliés”. Anamnese, 3: 209-219.

SKILLEN, A. J. (1980), “How to say things with walls”. Philosophy, 55 (214): 509-523.

SMITH, K. (2014), Émile Durkheim and the collective consciousness of society: a study in criminology. London, Anthem Press.

SMITH, P. (2008), Punishment and culture. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

SMITH, P. (2020), Durkheim and after. The Durkheimian Tradition, 1893–2020. Cambridge, Polity Press.

SPITZ, J-F. (2005), Le moment républicain en France. Paris, Gallimard.

TOSCANO, M. A. (1975), Evoluzione e crisi del mondo normativo: Durkheim e Weber. Roma, Laterza.

WATTS MILLER, W. (1996), Durkheim, morals and modernity. Montreal, McGill-Queen’s University Press.

WATTS MILLER, W. (1988), “Durkheim and individualism”. The Sociological Review, 36 (4): 647-673.

Downloads

Publicado

2026-09-01

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Como Citar

Massella, A. B. (2026). Punição e responsabilidade na tradição durkheimiana. Tempo Social, 38(2), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2026.245577