Single or double artificial insemination in fixed time in sows with ovulation induced by Luteinizing Hormon

Authors

  • Paulo Henrique Candini Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Reprodução Animal, São Paulo, SP
  • Aníbal de Sant'Anna Moretti Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Reprodução Animal, São Paulo, SP
  • Eraldo Luis Zanella Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária de Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS
  • Paulo Roberto Souza da Silveira Embrapa, Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Suínos e Aves, Concórdia, SC
  • Carlos Henrique Cabral Viana Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Reprodução Animal, São Paulo, SP
  • Isabel Santos Tecnopec, São Paulo, SP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-95962004000200008

Keywords:

Synchronization, Ovulation, Gonadotrophins, Artificial insemination, Sows

Abstract

Two hundred fifty four sows Camborough 22 (PIC®), were divided in 3 treatments: T 1 (n=60) - 600 UI of eCG after weaning and 5 mg of LH, after 72 h, with single artificial insemination (AI) (24 h after LH); T 2 (n=95) - same hormonal treatment of T1, with 2 AI (24 and 32 h after LH); T 3 (n=99) - control group, with 3 AI. The averages of weaning-to-estrus interval (WEI) in T1, T2 and T3 were of 87,4 ± 3,0 (87 - 111), 87 ± 0 (87) and 99,9 ± 13,6 (63 - 135) h, respectively, been reduced (P < 0,0001) by gonadotropins. The duration of estrus (DE) were of 44,3 ± 8,78 (12 - 60), 41,3 ± 9,77 (24 - 60) and 60,1 ± 10,22 (36 - 84) h, respectively for T1, T2 and T3, showed lower (P < 0,0001) in treated sows. Fourteen of 155 sows that received gonadotropins (9,03 %) didn't show oestrus. Among these, 10 return to estrus, denote 40% of the total returns. The diferences in LH to ovulation interval (LH-OV) among control group (56,1 ± 15,91, range: 21 - 93 h) and treated groups (35,7 ± 6,07 in T1 and 35,5 ± 6,06 in T2, range: 30 - 42 h) were significant (P < 0,0001). The litter size (LS) were of 10,6 ± 3,25 (2 - 16) in T1, 11,3 ± 3,0 (4 - 20) in T2 and 11,6 ± 2,74 (4 - 18) in T3, while the same demonstred number of piglets born alive (BA) of 9,6 ± 3,14 (2 - 16), 10,5 ± 2,83 (1 - 18) and 10,5 ± 2,73 (4 - 16). In both TL (P = 0,11) and NV (P = 0,06) there weren't any diference. The farrowing rate (FR) in T1, T2 and T3 were, respectively, 76,67 %, 88,42 % and 91,92 %, been diferent between T1 and T3 (P = 0,01). The gonadotropins were effetive in the ovulation induction and synchronization; the use of 2 AI maintained the reproductive index and, however the single AI do not show significance in LS, there is necessity of new reserchs in this area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2004-04-01

Issue

Section

UNDEFINIED

How to Cite

1.
Candini PH, Moretti A de S, Zanella EL, Silveira PRS da, Viana CHC, Santos I. Single or double artificial insemination in fixed time in sows with ovulation induced by Luteinizing Hormon. Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci. [Internet]. 2004 Apr. 1 [cited 2024 Nov. 12];41(2):124-30. Available from: https://revistas.usp.br/bjvras/article/view/6267