Reprodutibilidade, validade e responsividade da escala de Medida de Independência Funcional (MIF) na lesão medular: revisão da literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v15i3a102946Palavras-chave:
Traumatismos da Medula Espinhal/reabilitação, Avaliação da Deficiência, Literatura de Revisão como AssuntoResumo
A escala de Medida de Independência Funcional é um dos instrumentos mais utilizados na avaliação da capacidade funcional dos indivíduos com lesão medular. O registro da evolução funcional desses indivíduos é fundamental no processo de reabilitação. Este estudo teve como objetivo revisar na literatura científica a reprodutibilidade, validade e responsividade dessa escala em indivíduos com lesão medular. Os resultados encontrados mostraram alta concordância interna e reprodutibilidade inter-avaliador; validade e responsividade, exceto para avaliação da dimensão cognitiva e do domínio locomoção.
Downloads
Referências
Morganti B, Scivoletto G, Ditunno P, Ditunno JF, Molinari M. Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI): criterion validation. Spinal Cord. 2005;43(1):27-33.
Sipski ML, Richards JS. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation: state of the science. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85(4):310-42.
Guttmann L. Antecedentes históricos. In: Guttmann L, editor. Lesiones Medulares. Barcelona: Editoral JIMS; 1981. p. 1-8.
Lawton MP. The functional assessment of elderly people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1971;19(6):465-81.
Granger CV. The emerging science of functional assessment: our tool for outcomes analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79(3):235-40.
Hall KM, Cohen ME, Wright J, Call M, Werner P. Characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure in traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(11):1471-6.
van der Putten JJ, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66(4):480-4.
Gosman-Hedstrom G, Svensson E. Parallel reliability of the functional independence measure and the Barthel ADL index. Disabil Rehabil 2000;22(16):702-15.
Riazi A, Hobart JC, Lamping DL, Fitzpatrick R, Thompson AJ. Evidence-based measurement in multiple sclerosis: the psychometric properties of the physical and psychological dimensions of three quality of life rating scales. Mult Scler. 2003;9(4):411-9.
Davidoff GN, Roth EJ, Haughton JS, Ardner MS. Cognitive dysfunction in spinal cord injury patients: sensitivity of the Functional Independence Measure subscales vs neuropsychologic assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71(5):326-9.
Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger C. Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74(6):566-73.
Stineman MG, Shea JA, Jette A, Tassoni CJ, Ottenbacher KJ, Fiedler R, et al. The Functional Independence Measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(11):1101-8.
Uniform Data Set For Medical Rehabilitation. Guide for the use of the uniform data set for medical rehabilitation, Version 4.0. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo Research Foundation; 1986.
Riberto M, Miyazak MH, Filho DJ, Sakamoto H, Battistella LN. Reprodutibilidade da versão brasileira da Medida de Independência Funcional. Acta Fisiatr. 2001;8(1):45-52. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5935/0104-7795.20010002
Stineman MG, Jette A, Fiedler R, Granger C. Impairment-specific dimensions within the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(6):636-43.
Riberto M, Miyazak MH, Jucá SS, Sakamoto H, Pinto PPN, Battistella LR. Validation of the Brazilian version of Functional Independence Measure. Acta Fisiatr. 2004;11(2):72-6. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5935/0104-7795.20040003
Middleton JW, Truman G, Geraghty TJ. Neurological level effect on the discharge functional status of spinal cord injured persons after rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(11):1428-32.
Heinemann AW, Kirk P, Hastie BA, Semik P, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, et al. Relationships between disability measures and nursing effort during medical rehabilitation for patients with traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.1997;78(2):143-9.
Clark GS, Granger CV. Measurement. In: Grabois M, Garrison SJ, Hart KA, Lehmkuhl LD, editors. Physical medicine and rehabilitation: the complete approach. Houston: Blackwell; 2000. p.225-41.
Howell J, Miller P, Park HH, Sattler D, Todd Schack T, Spery E, et al. Wrinting guide - reliability and validiy. Fort Collins: Colorado State University Department of English; 2005 [cited 2007 Mar 01]. Available from: http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/research/relval/.
Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM). Scand J Rehabil Med. 1994;26(3):115-9.
Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, Fiedler RC. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(12):1226-32.
Segal ME, Ditunno JF, Staas WE. Interinstitutional agreement of individual functional independence measure (FIM) items measured at two sites on one sample of SCI patients. Paraplegia. 1993;31(10):622-31.
Karamehmetoglu SS, Karacan I, Elbasi N, Demirel G, Koyuncu H, Dosoglu M. The functional independence measure in spinal cord injured patients: comparison of questioning with observational rating. Spinal Cord. 1997;35(1):22-5.
Grey BA, Kennedy P. The Functional Independence Mearure: a comparative study of clinician and self ratings. Paraplegia. 1993;31:457-61.
Bland JM, Anaruma CA. Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha. BMJ. 1997;314:572.
Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, Deyo RA. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74(5):531-6.
Middleton JW, Harvey LA, Batty J, Cameron I, Quirk R, Winstanley J. Five additional mobility and locomotor items to improve responsiveness of the FIM in wheelchair-dependent individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2006;44(8):495-504.
Lugo LH, Salinas F, Garcia HI. Out-patient rehabilitation programme for spinal cord injured patients: evaluation of the results on motor FIM score. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(11-12):873-81.
Ota T, Akaboshi K, Nagata M, Sonoda S, Domen K, Seki M, et al. Functional assessment of patients with spinal cord injury: measured by the motor score and the Functional Independence Measure. Spinal Cord. 1996;34(9):531-5.
Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(5):459-68.
Marino RJ, Huang M, Knight P, Herbison GJ, Ditunno JF Jr, Segal M. Assessing selfcare status in quadriplegia: comparison of the quadriplegia index of function (QIF) and the functional independence measure (FIM). Paraplegia. 1993;31(4):225-33.
Lawton G, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Biering-Sorensen F, Tesio L, Slade A, Penta M, et al. Crosscultural validity of FIM in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2006;44(12):746-52.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2008 Acta Fisiátrica
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
