The identifying of deaf-blind communication forms for the planning of therapeutic interventions

Authors

  • Emerson Fachin Martins Universidade de Brasília. Faculdade de Ceilândia
  • Nadia Ivanov Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v16i1a103032

Keywords:

Communication Barriers, Deafness, Blindness, Therapeutics

Abstract

Visual and auditory disorders can affect motor and cognitive developments in children and compromise the functional acquisition in adults. Sensory impairments can alter the quality of the perception presented to the brain influencing the learning. In such cases the sensory adaptation is a necessary condition for the supplying of information that will benefit the development of the deaf-blind. Through the present study the communication forms presented by deaf-blind children and adults were verified aiming to identify strategies for the planning of therapeutic interventions. In order to accomplish that 19 families (with one of the members being deaf-blind) were interviewed. The deaf-blind subjects were divided into two groups according to their age, being considered as children subjects up to 17 years old and adults subjects more than 17 years old. The results didn’t show any predominant expressive communication form between the two age groups. However LIBRAS (brazilian sign language) was significantly more used by the adults in receptive communication forms than the other categories. It was concluded that professionals attending deaf-blind subjects must learn other forms of communication (mainly LIBRAS) to interact with deaf-blind patients and to plan therapeutic interventions appropriately.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chaikin EL. Distúrbios da visao e disfunçao visuo-perceptiva. In: Umpherd D. Reabilitaçao neurológica. Sao Paulo: Manole; 2004. p. 93-133.

Kostanjsek N, Bedirhan Üstün B. ICF:a multi-dimensional approach for measuring health and disability. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.

Winnick PJ. Educaçao física e esportes adaptados. Sao Paulo: Manole; 2004.

Shepherd R. Fisioterapia em pediatria. Sao Paulo: Santos; 1996.

American Speech and Hearing Association. How Does Your Child Hear and Talk? [text on the Internet]. Washington: ASHA [cited 2008 Set 20]. Available from: http://www.asha.org/public/speech/development/chart.htm

Northern J, Downs MP. Hearing in children. 14 ed. Baltimore: William & Wilkins; 1991.

Fundaçao Hilton Rocha. Sao Paulo. Braille; 1986 2:119-121.

Fundaçao Hilton Rocha. Sao Paulo. Braille; 1987 3:22-23.

Russo ICP, Santos TMM. Audiologia infantil. Sao Paulo: Cortez; 1994.

Ministério da Educaçao. Saberes e práticas da inclusao dificuldades de comunicaçao e sinalizaçao: surdocegueira e múltipla deficiência sensorial. Brasília: MEC/SEESP; 2004.

Miles B. Perspectiva general sobre la sordo-ceguera. Monmouth: DB-LINK; 1995. [citado 2008 Set 20]. Disponível em: http://www.dblink.org/pdf/over-span.pdf

Riester AE. Partnering to run a community-based program for deaf-blind young adults. Am Ann Deaf. 1992;137(5):411-5.

Osaki Y, Doi K, Takasawa M, Noda K, Nishimura H, Ihara A, et al. Cortical processing of tactile language in a postlingually deaf-blind subject.Neuroreport. 2004;15(2):287-91.

Published

2009-03-09

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

1.
Martins EF, Ivanov N. The identifying of deaf-blind communication forms for the planning of therapeutic interventions. Acta Fisiátr. [Internet]. 2009 Mar. 9 [cited 2024 May 22];16(1):10-3. Available from: https://revistas.usp.br/actafisiatrica/article/view/103032