Treatment of chronic osteoarthritic hip pain with phenol neurolysis of the obturator nerve Quadfen 1

Authors

  • Chiara Maria Thá Crema Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto – FMRP USP
  • Luiza Previato Trevisan Magario Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto – FMRP USP
  • Ana Paula Bertole Cirino dos Santos Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto – FMRP USP
  • Marcelo Riberto Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto – FMRP USP https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9549-8830

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v25i4a163881

Keywords:

Osteoarthritis, Hip, Pain, Rehabilitation, Therapeutics, Phenol, Quality of Life

Abstract

The conservative treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip is essentially symptomatic, seeking to relieve pain and optimize function. Despite presenting great clinical effect, hip arthroplasty may have restrictions, and in these situations, the neurolytic blockade of the anterior branch of the obturator nerve can be a therapeutic alternative, since it stops the afferent pain from the hip joint. Objective: To describe the results of treating patients with severe OA of the hip by applying phenol to the obturator nerve. Method: Twelve consecutive patients with OA of the hip, refractory to conservative treatment, were recruited to have the obturator nerve localized through electrostimulation and blocked with phenol. They were evaluated in terms of pain intensity via the visual analogue scale (VAS), pressure dolorimetry in the medial and lateral gluteus medius, gluteus minimus, and piriformis, and quality of life by the Harris Hip Score (HHS) at baseline (BL) after 1 (M1), 2 (M2), and 6 months (M6). Results: The patients were between 30 and 72 years old with an avarege of 47.5 ± 1.7 years old, 5 of them were women. Three patients were excluded for not being able to come for follow up evaluations.  VAS values vaieded from 8.2 ±.0.9 at BL to 6.6 ± 1.7 at M1, 6.5 ± 1.7 at M2, and 7.3 ± 1 in M6 (p=0.0094). As to the HHS, the values were BL:33.27 ± 2.9; M1:39.2 ± 6.4; M2:40.2 ± 8.1, and M6: 38.8 ± 9.7 in the final evaluation (p=0,040). For dolorimetry, non significant variation was BL: 11±5.7, M1: 7.9±2.2; M2: 10.9±5.6; M6: 8.1 ± 1.6 (p 0.69). Conclusion: The application of phenol to the anterior branch of the obturator nerve can be an alternative in the treatment of severe OA of the hip in patients with restrictions to Total Hip Replacement (THR), since it reduces pain and improves quality of life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Longo DL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Jameson JL, Loscalzo J. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 18 ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2012.

American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Osteoarthritis Guidelines. Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: 2000 update. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(9):1905-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(200009)43:9<1905::AID-ANR1>3.0.CO;2-P

Horn CC. Impacto da artroplastia total de quadril sobre a qualidade de vida em idosos portadores de artrose incapacitante [Dissertação]. Porto Alegre: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul; 2006

Silva MF, Masiero D, Chamlian TR, Wasserstein S. Bloqueio do nervo obturador como proposta terapêutica analgésica para osteoartrose de coxofemoral - técnica simplificada. Acta Fisiátr. 2000;7(2):75-7.

Abejón D. Técnicas intervencionistas en el dolor reumático. Bloqueo neural y articular: técnicas y evidencias. Reumatol Clin. 2006;2(Supl 1):S23-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1699-258X(06)73078-9

Monagle J, Ee J. Treatment of chronic hip osteoarthritic pain with intra-articular phenol. Indian J Pain. 2013;27(1):41-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-5333.114866

Wolfe F. The relation between tender points and fibromyalgia symptom variables: evidence that fibromyalgia is not a discrete disorder in the clinic. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56(4):268-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.56.4.268

Guimarães RP, Alves DPL, Silva GB, Bittar ST, Ono NK, Honda E, et al. Tradução e adaptação transcultural do instrumento de avaliação do quadril "Harris Hip Score". Acta Ortop Bras. 2010;18(3):142-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-78522010000300005

Braun L, Braun L. Técnicas intervencionistas no tratamento da dor. Cienc Cult. 2011;63(2):49-50. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21800/S0009-67252011000200015

Barbosa Neto JO, Sousa AM, Tahamtani SMM, Ashmawi HA. Bloqueio neurolítico subaracnoideo em paciente com dor oncológica refratária. Relato de caso. Rev Dor. 2013;14(1):76-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-00132013000100018

Quagliato E, Bang G, Botelho LA, Gianini MAC, Spósito MMM, Lianza S. Espasticidade: tratamento medicamentoso [texto na Internet]. São Paulo: Projeto Diretrizes ABM/CFM [citado 2017 Abr 27]. Disponível em: https://diretrizes.amb.org.br/_BibliotecaAntiga/espasticidade-tratamento-medicamentoso.pdf

Sposito, MMM. Bloqueios químicos para o tratamento da espasticidade na paralisia cerebral. Acta Fisiátr. 2010;17(2):68-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v17i2a103314

Imamura ST, Riberto M, Fischer AA, Imamura M, Kaziama HHS, Teixeira MJ. Successful pain relief by treatment of myofascial components in patients with hip pathology scheduled for total hip replacement. J Musculoskelet Pain. 1998;6(1):73-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J094v06n01_06

Downloads

Published

2018-12-31

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

1.
Crema CMT, Magario LPT, Santos APBC dos, Riberto M. Treatment of chronic osteoarthritic hip pain with phenol neurolysis of the obturator nerve Quadfen 1. Acta Fisiátr. [Internet]. 2018 Dec. 31 [cited 2024 Jun. 29];25(4):191-4. Available from: https://revistas.usp.br/actafisiatrica/article/view/163881