Cancer screening in disabled women: integrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v26i3a168026Keywords:
Disabled Persons, Women's Health, Neoplasms/rehabilitation, Mass ScreeningAbstract
Seeking to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality, screening strategies have been used. For screening actions to be effective, they must be available to the entire population. However, this is not the reality of women with disabilities. Objective: To identify how cancer screening has been performed in women with disabilities. Method: Integrative review with searches performed in the Pubmed, LILACS and Web of Science databases. The PICO strategy was adopted to elaborate the research question, the Mesh descriptors adjusted according to the database. Results: 25 articles were included. Women with disabilities have barriers to access the health services, among them: education, income, level of disability, marital status, not being in private health care, age, having a caregiver, lack of adaptation of services for people with disabilities and lack of knowledge of professionals and women themselves about the importance of screening. Because of these barriers, these women are less likely to have screening tests. Conclusion: Women with any type of disability are less likely to be part of breast and cervical cancer screening programs, even among developed countries.
Downloads
References
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Rastreamento. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2010. [Série A. Normas e Manuais Técnicos Cadernos de Atenção Primária, n. 29].
Cobigo V, Ouellette-Kuntz H, Balogh R, Leung F, Lin E, Lunsky Y. Are cervical and breast cancer screening programmes equitable? The case of women with intellectual and developmental disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013;57(5):478-88. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jir.12035
Wisdom JP, McGee MG, Horner-Johnson W, Michael YL, Adams E, Berlin M. Health disparities between women with and without disabilities: a review of the research. Soc Work Public Health. 2010;25(3):368-86. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19371910903240969
Andresen EM, Peterson-Besse JJ, Krahn GL, Walsh ES, Horner-Johnson W, Iezzoni LI. Pap, mammography, and clinical breast examination screening among women with disabilities: a systematic review. Womens Health Issues. 2013;23(4):e205–e214. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2013.04.002
Merten JW, Pomeranz JL, King JL, Moorhouse M, Wynn RD. Barriers to cancer screening for people with disabilities: a literature review. Disabil Health J. 2015;8(1):9-16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.06.004
Verger P, Aulagnier M, Souville M, Ravaud JF, Lussault PY, Garnier JP, et al. Women with disabilities: general practitioners and breast cancer screening. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28(2):215-20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.010
Horner-Johnson W, Dobbertin K, Andresen EM, Iezzoni LI. Breast and cervical cancer screening disparities associated with disability severity. Womens Health Issues. 2014;24(1):e147-53. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2013.10.009
Moher D, Dulberg CS, Wells GA. Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1994;272(2):122-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03520020048013
Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare. A guide to best practice. Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins: 2005.
Horner-Johnson W, Dobbertin K, Iezzoni LI. Disparities in receipt of breast and cervical cancer screening for rural women age 18 to 64 with disabilities. Womens Health Issues. 2015;25(3):246-53. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2015.02.004
Bussière C, Le Vaillant M, Pelletier-Fleury N. Screening for cervical cancer: What are the determinants among adults with disabilities living in institutions? Findings from a National Survey in France. Health Policy. 2015;119(6):794-801. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.02.004
Yen SM, Kung PT, Tsai WC. Mammography usage with relevant factors among women with mental disabilities in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based study. Res Dev Disabil. 2015;37:182-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.052
Guilcher SJ, Lofters A, Glazier RH, Jaglal SB, Voth J, Bayoumi AM. Level of disability, multi-morbidity and breast cancer screening: does severity matter? Prev Med. 2014;67:193-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.07.025
Parish SL, Swaine JG, Son E, Luken K. Determinants of cervical cancer screening among women with intellectual disabilities: evidence from medical records. Public Health Rep. 2013;128(6):519-26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003335491312800611
Berman BA, Jo AM, Cumberland WG, Booth H, Wolfson AA, Stern C, et al. D/deaf Breast Cancer Survivors: Their Experiences and Knowledge. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2017;28(3):1165-1190. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2017.0104
Drew JA, Short SE. Disability and Pap smear receipt among U.S. Women, 2000 and 2005. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010;42(4):258-66. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1363/4225810
Chen LS, Chou YJ, Tsay JH, Lee CH, Chou P, Huang N. Variation in the cervical cancer screening compliance among women with disability. J Med Screen. 2009;16(2):85-90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/jms.2009.008061
Martin S, Orlowski M, Ellison SA. Sociodemographic predictors of cervical cancer screening in women with a medical disability. Soc Work Public Health. 2013;28(6):583-90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2013.774253
Sakellariou D, Rotarou ES. Utilisation of cancer screening services by disabled women in Chile. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0176270. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176270
Parish SL, Swaine JG, Son E, Luken K. Receipt of mammography among women with intellectual disabilities: medical record data indicate substantial disparities for African American women. Disabil Health J. 2013;6(1):36-42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2012.08.004
Armour BS, Thierry JM, Wolf LA. State-level differences in breast and cervical cancer screening by disability status: United States, 2008. Womens Health Issues. 2009;19(6):406-14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2009.08.006
Clark MA, Rogers ML, Wen X, Wilcox V, McCarthy-Barnett K, Panarace J, et al. Repeat mammography screening among unmarried women with and without a disability. Womens Health Issues. 2009;19(6):415-24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2009.08.001
Iezzoni LI, Kurtz SG, Rao SR. Trends in Pap Testing Over Time for Women With and Without Chronic Disability. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(2):210-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.06.031
Cooper NS, Yoshida KK. Cancer screening behaviors among Canadian women living with physical disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(5):597-603. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.014
Diab ME, Johnston MV. Relationships between level of disability and receipt of preventive health services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(5):749-57. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.028
Liu SY, Clark MA. Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among disabled women aged 40-75: does quality of the experience matter? J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008;17(8):1321-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2007.0591
Courtney-Long E, Armour B, Frammartino B, Miller J. Factors associated with self-reported mammography use for women with and women without a disability. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011;20(9):1279-86. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2010.2609
Froehlich-Grobe K, Shropshire WC, Zimmerman H, Van Brunt J, Betts A. Reach of the Montana Cancer Control Program to Women with Disabilities. J Community Health. 2016;41(3):650-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10900-015-0141-y
Yen SM, Kung PT, Tsai WC. Sociodemographic characteristics and health-related factors affecting the use of Pap smear screening among women with mental disabilities in Taiwan. Res Dev Disabil. 2015;36C:491-497. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.040
Kung PT, Tsai WC, Chiou SJ. The assessment of the likelihood of mammography usage with relevant factors among women with disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2012;33(1):136-43. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.08.032
Huang KH, Tsai WC, Kung PT. The use of Pap smear and its influencing factors among women with disabilities in Taiwan. Res Dev Disabil. 2012;33(2):307-14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.09.016
Fang WH, Yen CF, Hu J, Lin JD, Loh CH. The utilization and barriers of Pap smear among women with visual impairment. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15(65):1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0354-4
Nandam N, Gaebler-Spira D, Byrne R, Wolfman J, Reis JP, Hung CW, et al. Breast cancer screening in women with cerebral palsy: Could care delivery be improved? Disabil Health J. 2018;11(3):435-441. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.02.002
Wilkinson JE, Lauer E, Freund KM, Rosen AK. Determinants of mammography in women with intellectual disabilities. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24(6):693-703. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.110095
Instituto Nacional de Câncer "José Alencar Gomes da Silva". Estimativa 2018: incidência de câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2018.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. ABC do câncer: abordagens básicas para o controle do câncer. 3 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Inca; 2017.
Salimena AMO, Oliveira MTL, Paiva ACPC, Melo MCSC. Mulheres portadoras de câncer de colo de útero: percepção da assistência de enfermagem. Rev Enferm Centro O Min. 2014; 4(1): 909-920. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.19175/recom.v0i0.401
Wender RC. Preserving primary care: the front line in the war against cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(1):4-5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.57.1.4
Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x
Bleyer A, Welch HG. Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(21):1998-2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1206809
Carvalho CFS, Brito RS, Medeiros SM. Análise contextual do atendimento ginecológico da mulher com deficiência física. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2014; 35(4):114-117. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2014.04.45335
Castro SS, Cieza A, Cesar CLG. Persons with disabilities, cancer screening and related factors. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2013;18(12):3705-3714. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232013001200026
Nicolau SM, Schraiber LB, Ayres JRCM. Mulheres com deficiência e sua dupla vulnerabilidade: contribuições para a construção da integralidade em saúde. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2013;18(3):863-872. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232013000300032
Carvalho RAO. Análise do perfil epidemiológico e sobrevida de pacientes com câncer colorretal em um hospital universitário de 2000 a 2010 [Dissertação]. Ribeirão Preto: Universidade de São Paulo; 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/D.22.2014.tde-19022015-162305
Willis DS, Kilbride L, Horsburgh D, Kennedy CM. Paid- and family- carers’ views on supporting women with intellectual disability through breast screening. Eur J Cancer Care. 2015; 24(4):473-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12245
Wyatt D, Talbot P. What knowledge and attitudes do paid carers of people with a learning disability have about cancer? Eur J Cancer Care. 2013; 22(3):300-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12029
Parish SL, Rose RA, Luken K, Swaine JG, O’Hare L. cancer screening knowledge changes: results from a randomized control trial of women with developmental disabilities. Res Soc Work Pract. 2012;22(1):43-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731511415550
International Agency for Research on Cancer. Latest global cancer data: Cancer burden rises to 18.1 million new cases and 9.6 million cancer deaths in 2018 [text on the Internet]. Lyon: IARC [cited 2018 Sep 12]. Available from: https://www.iarc.fr/featured-news/latest-global-cancer-data-cancer-burden-rises-to-18-1-million-new-cases-and-9-6-million-cancer-deaths-in-2018/
Assis RVBF. Rastreamento e vigilância do câncer colorretal: guidelines mundiais. GED Gastroenterol Endosc Dig. 2011:30(2):62-74.
São Paulo. Secretaria Municipal da Saúde. Boletim CEInfo Análise nº 06, Novembro/2012. São Paulo: SMS/CEInfo; 2012.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Acta Fisiátrica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
