Translation and cultural adaptation of the Questionnaire de Satisfaction de la Personne Amputée face à sa Prothèse (SAT-PRO) to portuguese language in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v27i1a169145Keywords:
Amputation, Artificial Limbs, Prostheses and Implants, Patient Satisfaction, TranslatingAbstract
The satisfaction of amputees with their prostheses is essential for the success of prosthetic rehabilitation, which justifies the need for instruments to be used by health professionals. One of the instruments that allows this assessment to be carried out is the SAT-PRO questionnaire, developed and applied in Canada, for elderly amputees of lower limb, nevertheless in Brazil it is not yet translated, adapted or validated. Objective: The aim of this study is to carry out the translation of the SAT-PRO into Portuguese and to present a culturally adapted version to be applied to elderly Brazilians. Method: The translation and adaptation were carried out in five stages, followed by a sixth stage, in which the content validation and reliability was verified. Results: During the translation and adaptation process, some ambiguities were found that were overcome by making consensual adjustments to the questionnaire. The content validity index of the items varied between 0.85 and 1 and the scale validity index was 0.98. The total value of Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.89. Conclusion: The process of translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the SAT-PRO revealed that it is adapted to the cultural reality of elderly Brazilians with lower limb amputation, also showing good content validity and reliability.
Downloads
References
World Health Organization. Guidelines for training personal in developing countries for prosthetics and orthotics services. Geneva: WHO; 2005.
Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89(3):422-9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005
DATASUS - Departamento de Informática do SUS [base de dados na Internet] Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; c2020 [citado 2020 Abr 27]. Disponível em: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftohtm.exe?sih/cnv/qiuf.def
Behrendt CA, Sigvant B, Szeberin Z, Beiles B, Eldrup N, Thomson IA, et al. International Variations in Amputation Practice: A VASCUNET Report. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;56(3):391-9. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.04.017
Unwin N. Epidemiology of lower extremity amputation in centres in Europe, North America and East Asia. Br J Surg. 2000; 87(3): 328-37. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01344.x
Belon H, Vigoda D. Emotional adaptation to limb loss. Phys Med Rehabil Clin. 2014; 25(1): 53-74. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2013.09.010
Moxey PW, Gogalniceanu P, Hinchliffe RJ, Loftus IM, Jones KJ, Thompson MM, et al. Lower extremity amputations--a review of global variability in incidence. Diabet Med. 2011;28(10):1144-53. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03279.x
Ephraim P, Dillingham T, Sector M, Pezzin L, MacKenzie E. Epidemiology of limb loss and congenital limb deficiency: a review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84(5): 747-761. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)04932-8
Hawkins AT, Pallangyo AJ, Herman AM, Schaumeier MJ, Smith AD, Hevelone ND, et al. The effect of social integration on outcomes after major lower extremity amputation. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(1):154-62. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.100
Sinha R, Van Den Heuvel WJ. A systematic literature review of quality of life in lower limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(11):883-99. Doi: http://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.514646
Senra H, Oliveira R, Leal I, Vieira C. Beyond the body image: a qualitative study on how adults experience lower limb amputation. Clin Rehabil. 2011;26(2):180-91. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/0269215511410731
Raichle K, Hanley M, Molton I, Kadel N, Campbell K, Phelps E, et al. Prosthesis use in persons with lower- and upper-limb amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008; 45(7):961-72. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2007.09.0151
Roffman C, Buchanan J, Allison G. Predictors of non-use of prostheses by people with lower limb amputation after discharge from rehabilitation: development and validation of clinical prediction rules. J Physiother. 2014;60(4);224-31. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2014.09.003
Bilodeau S, Hebert R, Desrosiers J. Lower limb prosthesis utilisation by elderly amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2000;24(2):126-32. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/03093640008726535
Fortington LV, Rommers GM, Geertzen JH, Postema K, Dijkstra PU. Mobility in elderly people with a lower limb amputation: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012; 13(4):319-25. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2010.12.097
Eijk M, Linde H, Buijck B, Geurts A, Zuidema R, Koopmans R. Predicting prosthetic use in elderly patients after major lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012;36(1):45-52. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364611430885
Webster J, Hakimi K, Williams R, Turner A, Norvell D, Czerniecki J. Prosthetic fitting, use, and satisfaction following lower-limb amputation: a prospective study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(10):1493-504. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2012.01.0001
Burden N, Simpson J, Murray C, Overton PG, Powell PA. Prosthesis use is associated with reduced physical self-disgust in limb amputees. Body Image. 2018;27:109-117. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.001
Baars EC, Schrier E, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JHB. Prosthesis satisfaction in lower limb amputees: A systematic review of associated factors and questionnaires. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(39):e12296. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012296
Mohd Hawari N, Jawaid M, Md Tahir P, Azmeer RA. Case study: survey of patient satisfaction with prosthesis quality and design among below-knee prosthetic leg socket users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(8):868-74. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2016.1269209
Bilodeau S, Hébert R, Desrosiers J. Questionnaire sur la satisfaction des personnes amputées du membre inférieur face à leur prothèse: développement et validation. Can J Occup Ther. 1999; 66(1):23-32. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/000841749906600103
Heinemann A, Bode R, O’Reilly C. Development and measurement properties of the orthotics and prosthetics user’s survey (OPUS): a comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2003;27(3):191-206. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/03093640308726682
Gallagher P, MacLachlan, M. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES). Rehab Psychol. 2000;45(2):130-54. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.45.2.130
Gallagher P, Franchignoni F, Giordano A, MacLachlan M. Trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scales. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89(6):487-96. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181dd8cf1
Matos DR, Naves JF, Araujo TC. Adaptação transcultural da Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales - Revised (TAPES-R): avaliação dos processos psicossociais envolvidos no ajuste à amputação e à prótese. Acta Fisiatr. 2018; 25(3): Doi: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317
Pires GKW, Silva FC, Luza LP, Gutierres Filho PJB, Deans S, Silva R. Semantic equivalence in Brazilian Portuguese translation of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2020;44(2):66-72. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364620906668
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;15;25(24):3186-91. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489-97.Doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459-67. doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
Yousoff MS. ABC of content validation and content validation index calculation. EIMJ. 2019; 11(2): 49-54. Doi: http://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.2
Borsa J, Damásio B, Bandeira D. Adaptação e validação de instrumentos psicológicos entre culturas: algumas considerações, Paideia. 2012; 22(53):423-32. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272253201314
Hendricson WD, Russell IJ, Prihoda TJ, Jacobson JM, Rogan A, Bishop GD, et al. Development and initial validation of a dual-language English-Spanish format for the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales. Arthritis Rheum. 1989;32(9):1153-9. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/anr.1780320915
Ghoseiri K, Safari MR. Prevalence of heat and perspiration discomfort inside prostheses: literature review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(6):855-68. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2013.06.0133
Luz SCT, Silva AR, Honório GJS, Santos KPB, Branco RLL, Ruy TS. Avaliação termográfica e adaptação à prótese de amputados de membros inferiores: um olhar qualitativo. Acta Fisiatr. 2018; 25(3). Doi: 10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v25i3a162668
Maroco J. Análise estatística com o SPSS Statistics. 6ª ed. Pêro Pinheiro: ReportNumber; 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Acta Fisiátrica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
