Reliability of the PhysioPlay™ device for assessing the reaction time of cancer patients

Authors

  • Júlia da Costa Anciães Universidade Federal de Alfenas - UNIFAL
  • Ricardo da Silva Alves Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí
  • Paola de Paula Silva Pereira Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí
  • Eduarda Suellen Figueiredo Silva do Nascimento Universidade Federal de Alfenas - UNIFAL
  • Denise Hollanda Iunes Universidade Federal de Alfenas - UNIFAL
  • Paulo Alexandre Bressan Universidade Federal de Alfenas - UNIFAL
  • Leonardo César Carvalho Universidade Federal de Alfenas - UNIFAL

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v27i4a180347

Keywords:

Neoplasms/Rehabilitation, Video Games, Virtual Reality, Reaction Time

Abstract

Objective: To determine the intra-evaluator and inter-evaluator reliability of the Physioplay-Kinect interaction and Trigno device for assessing the reaction time (RT) of cancer volunteers undergoing treatment. Methods: 46 cancer volunteers who underwent treatment modalities participated and were allocated into three groups: Chemotherapy Group (CG), Radiotherapy Group (RG), and Chemotherapy-Radiotherapy Group (CRG). The RT for all volunteers was assessed using the PhysioPlay™ and Trigno device. Results: In the intra-evaluator analysis, excellent levels of reliability (Physioplay: ICC> 0.99; Trigno 8: ICC>0.92) were observed in all groups. In the inter-evaluator analysis, excellent levels of reliability were observed in the CG (Physioplay: ICC= 0.98; Trigno 8: ICC= 0.98); excellent (Physioplay: ICC= 0.98) and good (Trigno 8: ICC= 0.44) levels in the RG; good (Physioplay: ICC= 0.49) and reasonable (Trigno 8: ICC= 0.29) levels in the CRG. Conclusion: The PhysioPlay™ and Trigno device proved to be reliable for assessing the RT of cancer volunteers undergoing treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Pojskic H, Pagaduan J, Uzicanin E, Separovic V, Spasic M, Foretic N, et al. Reliability, validity and usefulness of a new response time test for agility-based sports: a simple vs. complex motor task. J Sports Sci Med. 2019;18(4):623-635.

Wong AL, Haith AM, Krakauer JW. Motor Planning. Neuroscientist. 2015;21(4):385-98. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858414541484

Grol MJ, Lange FP, Verstraten FA, Passingham RE, Toni I. Cerebral changes during performance of overlearned arbitrary visuomotor associations. J Neurosci. 2006;26(1):117-25. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2786-05.2006

Kurata K, Hoshi E. Movement-related neuronal activity reflecting the transformation of coordinates in the ventral premotor cortex of monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 2002;88(6):3118-32. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00070.2002

Otaki M, Shibata K. The effect of different visual stimuli on reaction times: a performance comparison of young and middle-aged people. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019;31(3):250-254. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.31.250

Ashby FG, Isen AM, Turken AU. A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychol Rev. 1999;106(3):529-50. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.106.3.529

Jain A, Bansal R, Kumar A, Singh KD. A comparative study of visual and auditory reaction times on the basis of gender and physical activity levels of medical first year students. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2015;5(2):124-7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.157168

Sparrow WA, Begg RK, Parker S. Aging effects on visual reaction time in a single task condition and when treadmill walking. Motor Control. 2006;10(3):201-11. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1123/mcj.10.3.201

Waskiewicz Z. Information Processes, Stimulation and Perceptual Training in Fencing. J Hum Kinet 2008;19:63-82. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-008-0005-y

Lidor R, Ziv G. Physical and physiological attributes of female volleyball players--a review. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(7):1963-73. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ddf835

Malik B, Stillman M. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2008;8(1):56-65. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-008-0010-5

Zajączkowska R, Kocot-Kępska M, Leppert W, Wrzosek A, Mika J, Wordliczek J. Mechanisms of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(6):1451. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20061451

Staff NP, Grisold A, Grisold W, Windebank AJ. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A current review. Ann Neurol. 2017;81(6):772-781. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24951

Savina S, Zaydiner B. Cancer-Related Fatigue: Some Clinical Aspects. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2019;6(1):7-9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_45_18

Weber D, O'Brien K. Cancer and Cancer-Related Fatigue and the Interrelationships With Depression, Stress, and Inflammation. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2017;22(3):502-12. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2156587216676122

Silva Alves R, Iunes DH, Pereira IC, Borges JBC, Nogueira DA, Silva AM, et al. Influence of Exergaming on the Perception of Cancer-Related Fatigue. Games Health J. 2017;6(2):119-126. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2016.0051

Ferreira DM, Carvalho LC, Kosour C, Santos ATS, Marin LF, Santos GX, et al. Inter-and intra-rater analysis of hemiparetic shoulder abduction using PhysioPlayTM. Acta Fisiátr. 2019;26(3):123-6. Doi: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v26i3a166375

Lee IM, Shiroma EJ. Using accelerometers to measure physical activity in large-scale epidemiological studies: issues and challenges. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(3):197-201. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-093154

Poitras I, Bielmann M, Campeau-Lecours A, Mercier C, Bouyer LJ, Roy JS. Validity of wearable sensors at the shoulder joint: combining wireless electromyography sensors and inertial measurement units to perform physical workplace assessments. Sensors (Basel). 2019;19(8):1885. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19081885

Oliveira PF, Iunes DH, Alves RS, Carvalho JM, Menezes FS, Carvalho LC. Effects of exergaming in cancer related fatigue in the quality of life and electromyography of the middle deltoid of people with cancer in treatment: a controlled trial. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19(9):2591-7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.9.2591

Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):231-40. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/15184.1

Furlan L, Sterr A. The applicability of standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change to motor learning research-a behavioral study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:95. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00095

Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(2):135-60. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800204

Kimberlin CL, Winterstein AG. Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65(23):2276-84. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp070364

Ejupi A, Gschwind YJ, Brodie M, Zagler WL, Lord SR, Delbaere K. Kinect-based choice reaching and stepping reaction time tests for clinical and in-home assessment of fall risk in older people: a prospective study. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2016;13:2. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-016-0162-2

Clark RA, Pua YH, Bryant AL, Hunt MA. Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for providing lateral trunk lean feedback during gait retraining. Gait Posture. 2013;38(4):1064-6. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.03.029

van Diest M, Stegenga J, Wörtche HJ, Postema K, Verkerke GJ, Lamoth CJ. Suitability of Kinect for measuring whole body movement patterns during exergaming. J Biomech. 2014;47(12):2925-32. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.07.017

Shahid S. Review of hematological indices of cancer patients receiving combined chemotherapy & radiotherapy or receiving radiotherapy alone. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;105:145-55. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.06.001

Macciò A, Madeddu C, Gramignano G, Mulas C, Sanna E, Mantovani G. Efficacy and safety of oral lactoferrin supplementation in combination with rHuEPO-beta for the treatment of anemia in advanced cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: open-label, randomized controlled study. Oncologist. 2010;15(8):894-902. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0020

Downloads

Published

2020-12-31

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 4 (2020)

Section

Original Article

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Acta Fisiátrica

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Funding data

How to Cite

1.
Anciães J da C, Alves R da S, Silva Pereira P de P, Nascimento ESFS do, Iunes DH, Bressan PA, et al. Reliability of the PhysioPlay™ device for assessing the reaction time of cancer patients. Acta Fisiátr. [Internet]. 2020 Dec. 31 [cited 2024 May 20];27(4):242-7. Available from: https://revistas.usp.br/actafisiatrica/article/view/180347