Correlation between Moberg Pick-Up test and sensation threshold test after median nerve reconstruction

Authors

  • Alexandre Marcio Marcolino Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto
  • Rafael Inacio Barbosa Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto
  • Daniela Neto Aguiar de Souza Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto
  • Rafaela de Barros Rebelo Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto
  • Priscila Martins Delgado Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto
  • Nilton Mazzer Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto
  • Valéria Meirelles Carril Elui Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto
  • Marisa de Cássia Registro Fonseca Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5935/0104-7795.20120034

Keywords:

Hand, Rehabilitation, Peripheral Nerve Injuries

Abstract

Functional assessment of sensitivity is essential to analyzing the status, recovery, and effectiveness of the treatment program for patients who have suffered losses due to physical and/or sensory disability after peripheral nerve injuries. Such losses of sensation lead to a significant loss of hand function. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to establish a correlation between functional and sensory threshold tests after a peripheral nerve lesion in the hand. Method: Fourteen men aged 18 to 40 years, who had bruises and cut injuries at the volar region of the wrist resulting in median nerve lesion, were selected for study. All the subjects were at least 1-year post-surgery. An esthesiometer SORRI® and a modified Moberg pick-up test were used. The test was divided into two phases, one with eyes open and the other with eyes closed. Also, the same test was performed by two different examiners. It was a “blinded” test that was performed three times, being repeated by the examiners according to a random sequence kept during the entire evaluation. Mean age and standard deviation were obtained during analysis in which Pearson’s coefficient was calculated and the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was applied at 5% significance. Results: The mean age was 27.14 years with a standard deviation of 6.43 years, with the lesions being more frequently seen in men aged 21 to 30 years. Also, 64% of the cases involved lesion of the dominant hand. Pearson’s coefficient (r) regarding the correlation between sensory threshold test and Moberg pick-up test ranged from 0.5 to 0.7, which was statistically significant. Confidence intervals and p-values obtained from the Mann-Whitney test showed no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: One can conclude, therefore, that despite lacking standardized measures, the Moberg pick-up test correlated with the functional test. However, further studies are needed to support validation and reliability of the two methods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fonseca MCR, Mazzer N, Barbieri CH, Elui VMC. Traumas da mão: estudo retrospectivo. Rev Bras Ortop. 2006;41(5):181-6.

Ng CL, Ho DD, Chow SP. The Moberg Picking-up test: results of testing with a standard protocol. J Hand Ther. 1999;12(4):309-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1130(99)80069-6

Amirjani N, Ashworth NL, Gordon T, Edwards DC, Chan KM. Normative values and the effects of age, gender, and handedness on the Moberg Pick-Up Test. Muscle Nerve. 2007;35(6):788-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.20750

Polatkan S, Orhun E, Polatkan O, Nuzumlali E, Bayri O. Evaluation of the improvement of sensibility after primary median nerve repair at the wrist. Microsurgery. 1998;18(3):192-6.

Lundborg G. Sensation and sensorimotor integration in hand function. In: Lundborg G. Nerve injury and repair: regeneration, reconstruction and cortical remodelling. 2 ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p.198-210.

Dellon AL, Kallman CH. Evaluation of functional sensation in the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1983;8(6):865-70.

Moberg E. Objective methods for determining the functional value of sensibility in the hand. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1958;40B(3):454-76.

Edin BB, Westling G, Johansson RS. Independent control of human finger-tip forces at individual digits during precision lifting. J Physiol. 1992;450:547-64.

Jenmalm P, Dahlstedt S, Johansson RS. Visual and tactile information about object-curvature control fingertip forces and grasp kinematics in human dexterous manipulation. J Neurophysiol. 2000;84(6):2984-97.

Johansson RS, Westling G. Signals in tactile afferents from the fingers eliciting adaptive motor responses during precision grip. Exp Brain Res. 1987;66(1):141-54. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00236210

Dellon AL. The sensational contributions of Erik Moberg. J Hand Surg Br. 1990;15(1):14-24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0266-7681(90)90042-3

Bell-Krotoski J, Weinstein S, Weinstein C. Testing sensibility, including touch-pressure, two-point discrimination, point localization, and vibration. J Hand Ther.1993;6(2):114-23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1130(12)80292-4

Novak CB. Evaluation of hand sensibility: a review. J Hand Ther. 2001;14(4):266-72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1130(01)80004-1

Rosén B. Recovery of sensory and motor function after nerve repair. A rationale for evaluation. J Hand Ther. 1996;9(4):315-27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1130(96)80037-8

Fess EE. Guidelines for evaluating assessment instruments. J Hand Ther. 1995;8(2):144-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1130(12)80312-7

Moberg E. The unsolved problem - how to test the functional value of hand sensibility. J Hand Ther. 1991;4(3):105-10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S08941130(12)80222-5

Jerosch-Herold C. Assessment of sensibility after nerve injury and repair: a systematic review of evidence for validity, reliability and responsiveness of tests. J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30(3):252-64. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.12.006

Mielke K, Novak CB, Mackinnon SE, Feely CA. Hand sensibility measures used by therapists. Ann Plast Surg. 1996;36(3):292-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199603000-00011

Van Vliet D, Novak CB, Mackinnon SE. Duration of contact time alters cutaneous pressure threshold measurements. Ann Plast Surg. 1993;31(4):335-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000637-19931000000010

Bell-Krotoski JA. Sensibility testing with the semmesweinstein monofilaments. In: Mackin EJ, Callahan AD, Skirvem LH, Scheneider LH, Osterman Al, Hunter JM. Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 5 ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2002. p.194-213.

Lehman LF, Orsini MB, Nicholl AR. The development and adaptation of the Semmes Weinstein monofilaments in Brazil. J Hand Ther. 1993;6(4):290-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S08941130(12)80330-9

Fess EE. The need for reliability and validity in hand assessment instruments. J Hand Surg. 1986;11A(5):621-3.

Novak CB, Kelly L, Mackinnon SE. Sensory recovery after median nerve grafting. J Hand Surg Am. 1992;17(1):59-68. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/03635023(92)90114-5

Novak CB, Mackinnon SE, Williams JI, Kelly L. Establishment of reliability in the evaluation of hand sensibility. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92(2):311-22. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199308000-00017

Mattar Jr R. Lesões traumáticas da mão. Rev Bras Ortop. 2001;36(10):359-66.

Published

2012-12-09

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

1.
Marcolino AM, Barbosa RI, Souza DNA de, Rebelo R de B, Delgado PM, Mazzer N, et al. Correlation between Moberg Pick-Up test and sensation threshold test after median nerve reconstruction. Acta Fisiátr. [Internet]. 2012 Dec. 9 [cited 2024 May 19];19(4):216-21. Available from: https://revistas.usp.br/actafisiatrica/article/view/103722