Pharmacovigilance in oncology: pattern of spontaneous notifications, incidence of adverse drug reactions and under-reporting

Authors

  • Marília Berlofa Visacri State University of Campinas; School of Medical Sciences; Department of Clinical Pathology
  • Cinthia Madeira de Souza State University of Campinas; School of Medical Sciences; Department of Clinical Pathology
  • Rafaela Pimentel State University of Campinas; Institute of Biology
  • Cristina Rosa Barbosa State University of Campinas; Hospital of Clinics
  • Catarina Miyako Shibata Sato State University of Campinas; Hospital of Clinics
  • Silvia Granja State University of Campinas; Hospital of Clinics
  • Mécia de Marialva State University of Campinas; Hospital of Clinics
  • Carmen Silvia Passos Lima State University of Campinas; School of Medical Sciences; Department of Clinical Medicine
  • Priscila Gava Mazzola State University of Campinas; School of Medical Sciences; Department of Clinical Pathology
  • Patrícia Moriel State University of Campinas; School of Medical Sciences; Department of Clinical Pathology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-82502014000200021

Abstract

The high toxicity and narrow therapeutic window of antineoplastic agents makes pharmacovigilance studies essential in oncology. The objectives of the current study were to analyze the pattern of spontaneous notifications of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in oncology patients and to analyze the incidence of ADRs reported by outpatients on antineoplastic treatment in a tertiary care teaching hospital. To compose the pattern of ADR, the notification forms of reactions in oncology patients in 2010 were reviewed, and the reactions were classified based on the drug involved, mechanism, causality, and severity. To evaluate the incidence of reactions, a questionnaire at the time of chemotherapy was included, and the severity was classified based on the Common Terminology Criteria. The profiles of the 10 responses reported to the Pharmacovigilance Sector were type B, severe, possible, and they were primarily related to platinum compounds and taxanes. When the incidence of reactions was analyzed, it was observed that nausea, alopecia, fatigue, diarrhea, and taste disturbance were the most frequently reported reactions by oncology patients, and the grade 3 and 4 reactions were not reported. Based on this analysis, it is proposed that health professionals should be trained regarding notifications and clinical pharmacists should increasingly be brought on board to reduce under-reporting of ADRs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2014-04-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Pharmacovigilance in oncology: pattern of spontaneous notifications, incidence of adverse drug reactions and under-reporting . (2014). Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 50(2), 411-422. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-82502014000200021