MODELS OF IMMANENT CRITIQUE: A METATHEORETICAL DEBATE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1517-0128.v1i30p110-126Keywords:
critical theory , immanent critique , Rainer Forst , Rahel Jaeggi , critical approachesAbstract
This article inserts itself in current critical theory’s scenario, characterized by a manifold of approaches self-proclaimed immanent critiques, through a comparative exam of the proposals of Rainer Forst and Rahel Jaeggi. For this purpose, some main features of critical theory are presented from to the contributions of Titus Stahl aiming to build a general critical model including some of its tasks. Then, according to this model, some challenges to immanent critique are presented, and the critical proposals of Rainer Forst and Rahel Jaeggi are analyzed as concurrent ways dealing with them. So, in the end, both proposals are compared in their potentials of social analysis and social transformation.
Downloads
References
BOLTANSKI, L. On Critique. A Sociology of Emancipation. Oxford: Polity Press, 2011 (caps. 1, 3, 4 e 5).
CELIKATES, R. From Critical Social Theory to a Social Theory of Critique: On the Critique of Ideology after the Pragmatic Turn. Constellations. 13/1, 2006, pp. 21-40.
FORST, R. The ground of critique: On the concept of human dignity in social orders of justification. Philosophy & Social Criticism. 37, 2011a, pp. 965-97.
FORST, R. Right to Justification: elements of a constructivist theory of justice. Trad. Jeffrey Flynn. New Directions in Critical Theory Collection. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011b.
FORST, R. Kritik der Rechtfertigungsverhältnisse – Perspektiven einer kritischen Theorie der Politik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2011c. Usa-se aqui a tradução de Denilson Luís Werle (no prelo).
FORST, R. Toleration in Conflict: Past and Present. Transl. Ciaran Cronin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
FORST, R. Noumenal Power. In: The Journal of Political Philosophy, 2014(a), pp. 1-17.
HONNETH, A. Critique of Power: Reflective Stages in Critical Social Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991.
HONNETH, A. Derecho de la libertad: por una eticidad democratica. Madrid, 2014.
HRUBEC, M. Toward Participatory Social Philosophy: Critical versus Authoritarian Theory (manuscrito), 2012.
JAEGGI, R. Repensando a ideologia. In: Civitas, 8/1, 2008, 137-165.
JAEGGI, R. Critique of Forms of Life (manuscrito), s.d.
JAEGGI, R. Kritik von Lebensformen. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2014.
KOMPRIDIS, N. Critique and Disclosure: Critical Theory between Past and Future. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006.
LARA, M. P. The Future of Critical Theory?. In: Constellations, 15/2, 2008, 265-270.
MELO, R. Crítica e justificação em Rainer Forst. In: Cadernos de Filosofia Alemã, nº 22. São Paulo, 2013, pp. 11-30.
MÜLLER, F. S. Justifying the right to justification: An analysis of Rainer Forst’s constructivist theory of justice. In: Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 39, nº 10, 2013, pp. 1049-68.
STAHL, T. What is Immanent Critique? (manuscrito), 2013a. Disponível em: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2357957>. Aceso em 22/12/2015.
STAHL, T. Immanente Kritik: Elemente einer Theorie sozialer Praktiken. Frankfurt a.M.: Verlag, 2013b.
STRYDOM, P. Contemporary Critical Theory and Methodology. London; New York: Routledge, 2011.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Jorge Armindo Sell
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
