A defense of the majority principle in the context of debates on democratic legitimacy of judicial review of legislation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1517-0128.v40i1p184-195Keywords:
Democracy, Majority Principle, Judicial ReviewAbstract
The main objective of this article is to promote a critique to the argument according to which the majority principle presents risks to democracy, usually employed by the advocates of the democratic legitimacy of the judicial review of legislation. In a democratic society, where the principles of freedom and equality are adopted, the majority principle provides a fair criterion to identify the points of view that ought to prevail at the end of collective processes of decision-making. The rules that require unanimity and qualified majority are insufficient to right the alleged injustices produced by the majority principle, by virtue of the difficulties they face to be enforced, the absence of real protection for the minorities and the internal contractions they show. Although it is possible to imagine a legal system in which the majority principle makes the existence of a tyranny or dictatorship of the majority possible, to assume that, in this context, judges will necessarily form the group of defenders of minorities’ rights is to promote a selective application of the equality principle.
Downloads
References
ARISTÓTELES. A Política. 2. ed. Bauru: Edipro, 2009.
BARROSO, Luís Roberto. O controle de constitucionalidade no direito brasileiro. 4. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2009.
BERCOVICI, Gilberto. Soberania e constituição: para uma crítica do constitucionalismo. 2. ed. São Paulo: Quartier Latin, 2013.
CHURCHLAND, Patricia. Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Morality. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2011.
DAHL, Robert. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.
DUNBAR, Robin. Human Evolution: Our Brains and Behavior. Oxford University Press, 2016.
DWORKIN, Ronald. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011.
FLANAGAN, Owen. The Geography of Morals: Varieties of Moral Possibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
GAZZANIGA, Michael S. Who’s in Charge? Free Will and the Science of the Brain. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 2011.
GOYARD-FABRE, Simone. O que é democracia? São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.
HAIDT, Jonathan. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religions. New York: Vintage Books, 2013.
HAMILTON, Alexander; JAY, John; MADISON, James. The Federalist Papers: An Electronic Classic Series Publication. Disponível em: <http://www2.hn.psu.edu >. Acesso em 30 nov. 2014.
KELSEN, Hans. A democracia. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2000.
KELSEN, Hans. Jurisdição constitucional. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007.
LOCKE, John. Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. New Heaven: Yale University Press, 2003.
MAUS, Ingeborg. “O judiciário como superego da sociedade”. Disponível em: <http://www.direitocontemporaneo.com>. Acesso em: 28 jul. 2016.
MONTESQUIEU. O espírito das leis. 3 ed. São Paulo: Martin Fontes, 2005.
MOUFFE, Chantal. On the Political. London: Routledge, 2005.
ORWELL, George. Animal Farm. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2003.
RAWLS, John. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 2001.
ROUSSEAU, Jean Jacques. O contrato social: princípios do direito político. Bauru: Edipro, 2013.
SEARLE, John R. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
SOUZA, Jessé. A tolice da inteligência brasileira: ou como o país se deixa manipular pela elite. São Paulo: LeYa, 2015.
STRECK, Lênio Luiz. Verdade e consenso: constituição, hermenêutica e teorias discursivas. 4. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2012.
TOMASELLO, Michael. A Natural History of Human Morality. London: Harvard University Press, 2016.
WALDRON, Jeremy. The Dignity of Legislation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
WALDRON, Jeremy. “The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review”. The Yale Law Journal. Disponível em: <http://philosophyfaculty.ucsd.edu/FACULTY/RARNESON/Courses/Waldroncore.pdf>. Acesso em: 28 mar. 2017.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Paulo de Tarso Fernandes Souza, Martônio Mont'Alverne Barreto Lima
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.