PHILOSOPHICAL CONSIDERATIONS ABOUT READING AND DISSEMINATION OF THE PRINCE IN EARLY MODERN ERA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1517-0128.v2i25p38-55Keywords:
The Prince, Machiavellianism, Sovereign, State, DisclosureAbstract
The Prince is a political text founder of modernity. Its disclosure was so controversial that it is quite difficult to have an exact idea about Machiavelli's own ideas regarding the purpose of his work. Created from the repercussions to the text of the Florentine thinker, the concept of Machiavellianism identifies the modern political thought in such a way that the emergence of the terms sovereign and state joined him almost interchangeably. In this article, I will examine some of the key reactions to The Prince to show the genesis of Machiavellianism in the backdrop of interpretative conflicts in dispute in the boiling of the modern state. My goal is to support the thesis that the thought of Machiavelli was critical to the ruptures that led to political modernity, regardless of his real intentions.Downloads
References
ASCH, Ronald. The thirty years war - The Holy Roman Empire and Europe, 1618-48. USA: Palgrave, 1997.
BARCIA, Franco. Tacito e tacitismi in Italia tra Cinquecento e Seiscento. In: SUPPA, Silvio. Tacito e tacitismi in Italia da Machiavelli a Vico. Teoria e storia della ragion di Stato. Quaderno 3. Napoli: Archivio della Ragion di Stato – Adarte, 2003. pp. 43-58.
BEAME. Edmond M. The Use and Abuse of Machiavelli: The Sixteenth-Century French Adaptation. Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 43, No. 1. (Jan. - Mar., 1982), pp. 33-54.
BOBBITT, Philip. The shield of Achilles – war, peace and the course of history. Penguin Books: New York, 2002.
BOTERO, Giovanni. Della ragion di Stato. Roma: Donzelli editore, 1997.
D'ANDREA. Antonio. The Political and Ideological Context of Innocent Gentillet's Anti-Machiavel. Renaissance Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 4. (Winter, 1970), pp. 397-411.
D'ANDREA. Antonio. The Last Years of Innocent Gentillet: ‘Princeps Adversariorum Machiavelli’. Renaissance Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 1. (Spring, 1967), pp. 12-16.
DELLA CASA, Giovanni. Orazione scritta a Carlo V Imperatore intorno alla restituzione della città di Piacenza. Ricciardi, Milano, 1960 [edição digital de 15 de maio de 2007]. Disponível em: http://bivio.signum.sns.it/bvWorkTOC.php?authorSign=DellaCasaGiovanni&titleSign=OrazioneScrittaACarloV ]. Acessado em 15 de janeiro de 2015.
DONALDSON, Peter Samuel. Machiavelli and mystery of state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
FIGGIS, John Neville. Political Thought from Gerson to Grotius: 1414–1625: Seven Studies. Canadá: Batoche Books, Kitchener, 1999.
FIRPO, Luigi. Scritti sul pensiero politico del Rinascimento e della Controriforma. Torino: Utet Libreria, 2005.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Securité, territoire et population. Cours au Collège de France (1977-1978). Édition établie sous la direction de François Ewald et Alessandro Fontana, par Michel Senellart. Paris: Gallimard, Seuil, 2004.
GENTILLET, Innocent. Discours sur les moyens de bien gouverner et maintenir en bonne paix un Royaume ou autre Principauté. Contre Nicolas Machiavel Florentin. Genève: Broz, 1968.
GILBERT, Felix. Machiavelli and Guicciardini. Journal of the Warburg Institute, Vol. 2, No. 3. (Jan., 1939), pp. 263-266.
GUICCIARDINI, Francesco. Dialogo del reggimento di Firenzi. p. 230-231. A cura de Gian Mario Anselmi e Carlo Varotti. Bollati Boringhieri: Torino, (1994) 2006.
GUICCIARDINI, Francesco. Se sia lecito condurre el populo alle buone legge con la forza non potendo farsi altrimenti. In: Scritti politici e Ricordi. Collezione: Scrittori d'Italia. Bari: G. Laterza Editore, 1933 [Edição eletrônica de 2000].
HASLAM, Jonathan. A necessidade é a maior virtude – o pensamento realista nas relações internacionais. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2006.
KAHN, Victoria. Reading Machiavelli: Innocent Gentillet's Discourse on Method. Political Theory, Vol. 22, No. 4. (Nov., 1994), pp. 539-560.
KELLEY, Donald R. Murd'rous Machiavel in France: A Post Mortem. Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 85, No. 4. (Dec., 1970), pp. 545-559.
LUCIANI, Vincent. Guicciardini and the Risorgimento. Italica, Vol. 18, No. 4. (Dec., 1941), pp. 186-192.
MATTEI, Rodolfo De. Il problema della “ragion di Stato” nell’Età della controriforma. Milano – Napoli: Riccardo Ricciardi Editore, 1979.
MÉCHOULAN, Henri. La raison d’État dans la pensée espagnole au siècle d’Or, 1550-1650. In: ZARKA, Yves Charles [org]. Raison e déraison d’État. Théoriciens et théories de la raison d’État aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1994.
MEINECKE, Friedrich. L’idée de la raison d’État dans l’histoire des temps modernes. Traduit de l’allemand par Maurice Chevallier. Geneva: DROZ, 1973.
MESNARD, Pierre. L’essor de la philosophie politique au XVIe siècle. Troisième édition. Paris: Vrin, 1977.
ORSINI, Napoleone. "Policy": Or the Language of Elizabethan Machiavellianism. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, Vol. 9. (1946), pp. 122-134.
PARKIN, John. Machiavellism in Etienne Pasquier's "Pourparler du Prince". The Modern Language Review, Vol. 68, No. 3. (Jul., 1973), pp. 530-544.
POCOCK, J.G.A. The Machiavellian moment – Florentine Political thought and the Atlantic republican tradition. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, [1975] 2003.
QUARTIM DE MORAES, J. A justificação do tiranicídio no pensamento proto-liberal de Juan de Mariana. Coleção Primeira Versão, IFCH/UNICAMP. Campinas: IFCH/UNICAMP, 1993.
RIBADENEYRA, Pedro de. Le Prince Chrestien. Paris: Fayard, 1996.
SALINAS, S. C. Estudios de derecho internacional público. INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES JURÍDICAS - Serie H, Núm. 14. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. ISBN 968-837-855-0. pp 41-54.
SALMON, J. H. M. Cicero and Tacitus in Sixteenth-Century France. The American Historical Review, Vol. 85, No. 2. (Apr., 1980), pp. 307-331.
SARUBBI, Antonio; SCUDIERI, Pasqualina. I teorici della ragion di Stato – Mito e realtà. Napoli: Edizione Scientifiche Italiane, 2000.
SENELLART, M. Machiavélisme et raison d’État – XIIe-XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Presses Universitaire de France, 1989.
SKINNER, Quentin. As fundações do pensamento político moderno. São Paulo: Martins fontes, 1996.
SKINNER, Quentin. Maquiavel. Tradução de Maria Lúcia Montes. São Paulo: Ed. Brasiliense, 1988.
TIERNEY, Brian. Natural Law and Natural Rights - Old Problems and Recent Approaches. The Review of Politics, Vol. 64, No. 3. (Summer, 2002), pp. 389-406.
TUCK, Richard. Philosophy and government, 1572-1651. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
VASOLI, Cesare. Machiavel inventeur de la raison d’État? In: ZARKA, Yves Charles [org]. Raison e déraison d’État. Théoriciens et théories de la raison d’État aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1994.
WEBER, Wolfgang. What a Good Ruler Should Not Do - Theoretical Limits of Royal Power in European theories of absolutism 1500-1700. Sixteenth Century Journal, Vol. 26, No. 4. (Winter, 1995), pp. 897-915.
WHITFIELD, J. H. The Politics of Machiavelli. The Modern Language Review, Vol. 50, No 4. (Oct., 1955), pp. 433-443.
YHARRASSARRY, Julián Viejo. “Contra politicos atheistas”. Razón católica y monarquía hispánica en la segunda mitad del siglo XVII. In: BORRELLI, Gianfranco [A cura di]. Prudenza civile, bene comune, guerra giusta. Percorsi della ragion di Stato tra seicento e settecento. Teoria e storia della ragion di Stato. Quaderno 1. Napoli: Archivio della Ragion di Stato – Adarte, 1999.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Rodolfo Jacarandá
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
